journal article·2021-04-06Open access

Development of Optimal Design Method for Steel Double-Beam Floor System Considering Rotational Constraints

Insub Choi, Dongwon Kim, Junhee Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

Under high gravity loads, steel double-beam floor systems need to be reinforced by beam-end concrete panels to reduce the material quantity since rotational constraints from the concrete panel can decrease the moment demand by inducing a negative moment at the ends of the beams. However, the optimal design process for the material quantity of steel beams requires a time-consuming iterative analysis for the entire floor system while especially keeping in consideration the rotational constraints in composite connections between the concrete panel and steel beams. This study aimed to develop an optimal design method with the LM (Length-Moment) index for the steel double-beam floor system to minimize material quantity without the iterative design process. The LM index is an indicator that can select a minimum cross-section of the steel beams in consideration of the flexural strength by lateral-torsional buckling. To verify the proposed design method, the material quantities between the proposed and code-based design methods were compared at various gravity loads. The proposed design method successfully optimized the material quantity of the steel double-beam floor systems without the iterative analysis by simply choosing the LM index of the steel beams that can minimize objective function while satisfying the safety-related constraint conditions. In particular, under the high gravity loads, the proposed design method was superb at providing a quantity-optimized design option. Thus, the proposed optimal design method can be an alternative for designing the steel double-beam floor system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Development of an optimum pre-founded column system for top-down construction10.3846/13923730.2012.723397 ↗
2. Load-sharing ratio of prebored and precast pile in top-down method construction process10.1002/tal.1472 ↗
3. A study of the planning methods in the underground work of top-down construction in high-rise buildings10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044-1045.561 ↗
4. IEA (2019). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, International Energy Agency.
5. Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.008 ↗
6. Environmental benefits arising from demountable steel-concrete composite floor systems in buildings10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.014 ↗
7. Composite effects on rotational constraints of a double-beam system reinforced with beam-end concrete10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111585 ↗
8. Technological development and engineering applications of novel steel-concrete composite structures10.1007/s11709-019-0514-x ↗
9. Composite Behavior of Insulated Concrete Sandwich Wall Panels Subjected to Wind Pressure and Suction10.3390/ma8031264 ↗
10. Effect of cyclic loading on composite behavior of insulated concrete sandwich wall panels with GFRP shear connectors10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.030 ↗
11. Li, C., Li, G., Yu, R., Ma, X., Qin, P., and Wang, X. (2020). Study on Mechanical Properties of Multi-Cavity Steel–Concrete Composite Floor. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238444 ↗
12. Mullett, D.L. (1998). Composite Floor Systems, The Steel Construction Institute, Blackwell Science.
13. Naccarato, P.A. (2000). Modern Steel Construction, American Institute of Steel Construction.
14. Experimental Evaluation of New Concrete Encased Steel Composite Beam to Steel Column Joint10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:4(519) ↗
15. Cyclic loading test for concrete-filled U-shaped steel beam-RC column connections10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.033 ↗
16. Cyclic Loading Test for Beam-Column Connections of Concrete-Filled U-Shaped Steel Beams and Concrete-Encased Steel Angle Columns10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001242 ↗
17. A novel hybrid system with rc-encased steel joists10.1080/19648189.2011.9723353 ↗
18. Structural performance of composite double beam system10.1177/1369433215624599 ↗
19. Choi, I., Kim, J., and Kim, D. (2020). LCA-Based Investigation of Environmental Impacts for Novel Double-Beam Floor System Subjected to High Gravity Loads. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12219193 ↗
20. Tan, Y., Zhu, B., Yan, T., Huang, B., Wang, X., Yang, W., and Huang, B. (2019). Experimental Study of the Mechanical Behavior of the Steel–Concrete Joints in a Composite Truss Bridge. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9050854 ↗
21. Dung Le, D., Nguyen, X.-H., and Nguyen, Q.-H. (2020). Cyclic Testing of a Composite Joint between a Reinforced Concrete Column and a Steel Beam. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072385 ↗
22. Cost-optimal design for nearly zero energy office buildings located in warm climates10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.078 ↗
23. Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101014 ↗
24. Multi-objective sustainable design model for integrating CO 2 emissions and costs for slabs in office buildings10.1080/15732479.2019.1683590 ↗
25. Yepes, V., Dasí-Gil, M., Martínez-Muñoz, D., López-Desfilis, V.J., and Martí, J.V. (2019). Heuristic Techniques for the Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Pedestrian Bridges. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9163253 ↗
26. MOLIT (2016). Korean Design Standard (in Korean).
27. AISC Committee (2016). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), AISC Committee.
28. ACI Committee (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318-19), ACI Committee.
29. Design of Steel Frames Using Ant Colony Optimization10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:3(369) ↗
30. ASCE ASCE/SEI 7-16 (2016). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers.
31. Korean Standard Association KS D 3502:2021 (2021). Dimensions, Mass and Permissible Variations of Hot Rolled Steel Sections.
32. MIDAS IT (2017). MIDAS/GEN V8.5.5 Users Manual, MIDAS IT.
33. Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.F., Lee, D., and Mendoza, B. (2013). Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.