journal article·2020-11-23Open access

Effect of Surface Treatment and Storage Time on Immediate Repair Bond Strength Durability of Methacrylate- and Ormocer-Based Bulk Fill Resin Composites

Farid S. El-Askary, Sara A. Botros, Mutlu Özcan

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 22

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment and storage time on immediate repair bond durability of methacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk fill composites. In total, 265 discs were divided into 32 groups (n = 8/group) according to: (1) Material: X-tra fil and Admira Fusion X-tra; (2) Surface treatment: oxygen inhibition; matrix; Futurabond M+; Silane/Futurabond M+; Admira Bond; Silane/Admira Bond; ceramic repair system; and Silane/Cimara bond; and (3) Storage time: 24 h and 6 months. Each disc received three micro-cylinders from the same material. Specimens were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing either at 24 h or 6 months. Data were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey’s test/Student t-test (p = 0.05). All experimental factors had significant effect on bond strength (p < 0.0001). Drop in bond strength was noticed in both materials after six months (p < 0.05), except for Admira Fusion X-tra treated with silane/cimara adhesive (p = 0.860). Both materials showed insignificant values with Admira bond either at 24 h or 6 months (p = 0.275 and p = 0.060, respectively). For other treatments, X-tra fil showed significantly higher values at 24 h and 6 months (p < 0.05). Ceramic repair system can be used to immediately repair both methacrylate- and ormocer-based composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt

Restorative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, El Sherouk City, Cairo 11837, Egypt

Center of Dental Medicine, Division of Dental Biomaterials, Clinic for Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. The quest for stable biomimetic repair of teeth: Technology of resin-bonded Composites10.4012/dmj.2019-201 ↗
2. State of the art of self-etch adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 ↗
3. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015 ↗
4. The potential of a resin-based composite to be cured to a 4 mm depth10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.016 ↗
5. Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.4012/dmj.2018-180 ↗
6. Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations
7. Repair of restorations—Criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006 ↗
8. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014 ↗
9. Effect of Silane Primers and Unfilled Resin Bonding Agents on Repair Bond Strength of a Prosthodontic Microfilled Composite10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00899.x ↗
10. Effect of Surface Conditioning Methods on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Composite After Aging Conditions10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007 ↗
11. Bond Strength of Repaired Anterior Composite Resins: An in Vitro Study10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00044-4 ↗
12. Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
13. Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive10.1080/23337931.2017.1412262 ↗
14. Adhesive system affects repair bond strength of resin composite
15. Invitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12 ↗
16. Effect of thermocycling and surface treatment on repair bond strength of composite
17. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method10.1080/23337931.2017.1301211 ↗
18. Tensile Bond Strength of Immediately Repaired Anterior Microfine Hybrid Restorative Composite Using Nontrimmed Hourglass Specimens
19. Immediate versus delayed repair bond strength of a nano-hybrid resin composite
20. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.009 ↗
21. Immediate and delayed repair bond strength of a new ormocer restorative material as a function of mechanical and chemical surface conditioning methods10.1080/01694243.2016.1215012 ↗
22. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites?10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013 ↗
23. Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.021 ↗
24. Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: Effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro10.1080/01694243.2017.1395162 ↗
25. The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types10.1080/01694243.2019.1609643 ↗
26. Efficacy of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composite repair
27. Repair of aged bulk-fill composite with posterior composite: Effect of different surface treatments10.1111/jerd.12391 ↗
28. Repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composite: Effect of different adhesive protocols10.4012/dmj.2018-291 ↗
29. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.001 ↗
30. Replacement of resin-based composite: Evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching
31. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins10.1007/s00784-010-0426-6 ↗
32. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.003 ↗
33. Polymerization kinetics and impact of postpolymerization on the Degree of Conversion of bulk-fill resin-composite at clinically relevant depth10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.004 ↗
34. The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites10.1016/0022-3913(89)90104-2 ↗
35. Efficiency of different repair kits on bonding to aged dental resin composite substrates10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.12.005 ↗
36. Build-up and Repair of Light-cured Composites: Bond Strength10.1177/00220345840630101501 ↗
37. The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaired composites10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80025-2 ↗
38. Strength of composites repaired by laminating with dissimilar composites10.1016/0022-3913(88)90278-8 ↗
39. Impact of light transmittance mode on polymerisation kinetics in bulk-fill resin-based composites10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.017 ↗
40. Influence of irradiation time on subsurface degree of conversion and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites10.1007/s00784-014-1302-6 ↗
41. Effect of drying time of 3-mathacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane on the shear bond strength of a composite resin to silica-coated base/noble alloys10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.003 ↗
42. Repair Bond Strength and Leakage of Non-Aged and Aged Bulk-fill Composite
43. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 ↗
44. Effect of Silane Coupling Agent on Interphase and Performance of Glass Fibers/Unsaturated Polyester Composites10.1006/jcis.2001.7788 ↗
45. Shear vs. Tensile Bond Strength of Resin Composite Bonded to Ceramic10.1177/00220345950740091401 ↗
46. Influence of increment thickness on radiant energy and microhardness of bulk fill resin composites10.4012/dmj.2017-032 ↗
47. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin Composites10.4012/dmj.2018-063 ↗
48. Finite element analysis of shear versus torsion adhesive strength tests for dental resin composites10.1163/156856109X433072 ↗
49. Shear bond strength test using different loading conditions—A finite element analysis
50. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020 ↗
51. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic?
52. Repair versus replacement of defective direct composite restorations in teaching programmes in United Kingdom and Irish dental schools
53. Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: A survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.010 ↗
54. Contemporary teaching of restoration repair at dental schools in Germany-Close to universality and consistency10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.008 ↗