Listener-Position and Orientation Dependency of Auditory Perception in an Enclosed Space: Elicitation of Salient Attributes
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a subjective study conducted on the perception of auditory attributes depending on listener position and head orientation in an enclosed space. Two elicitation experiments were carried out using the repertory grid technique—in-situ and laboratory experiments—which aimed to identify perceptual attributes among 10 different combinations of the listener’s positions and head orientations in a concert hall. It was found that, between the in-situ and laboratory experiments, the listening positions and head orientations were clustered identically. Ten salient perceptual attributes were identified from the data obtained from the laboratory experiment. Whilst these included conventional attributes such as ASW (apparent source width) and LEV (listener envelopment), new attributes such as PRL (perceived reverb loudness), ARW (apparent reverb width) and Reverb Direction were identified, and they are hypothesised to be sub-attributes of LEV (listener envelopment). Timbral characteristics such as Reverb Brightness and Echo Brightness were also identified as salient attributes, which are considered to potentially contribute to the overall perceived clarity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multisensory perception and integration · Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods · Neuroscience and Music Perception
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Applied Psychoacoustics Laboratory (APL), University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
Funding
University of Huddersfield
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Subjective Acoustic Experience in Concert Auditoria
2. Auditory Spaciousness: Some Further Psychoacoustic Analyses10.1121/1.394048 ↗
3. Subjective Study of British Symphony Concert Halls
4. Spatial Impression Due to Early Lateral Reflections in Concert Halls: The Derivation of a Physical Measure10.1016/S0022-460X(81)80020-X ↗
5. de Keet, V.W. (1968, January 21–28). The Influence of Early Lateral Reflections on the Spatial Impression. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Acoustics, Tokyo, Japan.
6. Contribution of Reverberation to Auditory Spaciousness in Concert Halls10.1250/ast.10.87 ↗
7. Pilot Study of Simulated Spaciousness
8. The Influence of Late Arriving Energy on Spatial Impression10.1121/1.411951 ↗
9. Interaural Cross-correlation, Lateral Fraction, and Low- and High-frequency Sound Levels as Measures of Acoustical Quality in Concert Halls10.1121/1.414451 ↗
10. Spatial Quality Evaluation for Reproduced Sound: Terminology, Meaning, and a Scene-Based Paradigm
11. Concert Hall Acoustics Assessment with Individually Elicited Attributes10.1121/1.3607422 ↗
12. Disentangling Preference Ratings of Concert Hall Acoustics Using Subjective Sensory Profiles10.1121/1.4756826 ↗
13. Concert Hall Acoustics: Repertoire, Listening Position, and Individual Taste of the Listeners Influence the Qualitative Attributes and Preferences10.1121/1.4958686 ↗
14. Relationships between Preference Ratings, Sensory Profiles, and Acoustical Measurements in Concert Halls10.1121/1.4836335 ↗
15. A Measuring Instrument for the Auditory Perception of Rooms: The Room Acoustical Quality Inventory (RAQI)10.1121/1.5051453 ↗
16. Schneiderwind, C., and Neidhardt, A. (2019, January 15–17). Perceptual Differences of Position Dependent Room Acoustics in a Small Conference Room. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Room Acoustics; Nederlands Akoestisch Genootschap, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
17. Pedersen, T.H., and Zacharov, N. (2015). The Development of a Sound Wheel for Reproduced Sound, Audio Engineering Society.
18. Zacharov, N., and Pedersen, T.H. (2015). Spatial Sound Attributes—Development of a Common Lexicon, Audio Engineering Society.
19. Mason, R., Kim, C., and Brookes, T. (2009, January 7–10). Perception of Head-Position-Dependent Variations in Interaural Cross-Correlation Coefficient. Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society Preprint, Munich, Germany.
20. Lee, H. (2013). Apparent Source Width and Listener Envelopment in Relation to Source-Listener Distance, Audio Engineering Society.
21. Stone, H., Sidel, J., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A., and Singleton, R.C. (2004). Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. Descriptive Sensory Analysis in Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470385036.ch1c ↗
22. Meilgaard, M.C., Carr, B.T., and Civille, G.V. (2006). Sensory Evaluation Techniques, CRC Press. [4th ed.].10.1201/b16452 ↗
23. Sensory Mapping Using Flash Profile. Comparison with a Conventional Descriptive Method for the Evaluation of the Flavour of Fruit Dairy Products10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00085-5 ↗
24. Lorho, G. (2005). Individual Vocabulary Profiling of Spatial Enhancement Systems for Stereo Headphone Reproduction, Audio Engineering Society.
25. Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton.
26. Identification of Quality Attributes of Spatial Audio by Repertory Grid Technique
27. McArthur, A., Sandler, M., and Stewart, R. (2018). Perception of Mismatched Auditory Distance—Cinematic VR, Audio Engineering Society.
28. Making Recordings for Simulation Tests in the Archimedes Project
29. Farina, A. (2000). Simultaneous Measurement of Impulse Response and Distortion with a Swept-Sine Technique, Audio Engineering Society.
30. Johnson, D., Harker, A., and Lee, H. (2015). HAART: A New Impulse Response Toolbox for Spatial Audio Research, Audio Engineering Society.
31. Bacila, B.I., and Lee, H. (2019). 360° Binaural Room Impulse Response (BRIR) Database for 6DOF Spatial Perception Research, Audio Engineering Society.
32. Resolving Front-Back Ambiguity with Head Rotation: The Role of Level Dynamics10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.020 ↗
33. Virtual Sound Source Positioning Using Vector Base Amplitude Panning
34. Romanov, M., Berghold, P., Frank, M., Rudrich, D., Zaunschirm, M., and Zotter, F. (2017). Implementation and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Headtracker for Binaural Synthesis, Audio Engineering Society.
35. ITU-R BS.1116-3 (2015). Methods for the Subjective Assessment of Small Impairments in Audio Systems, International Telecommunications Union.
36. Systematic Analysis of Verbalizations Produced in Comparing Musical Timbres10.1080/002075996401025 ↗
37. McArthur, A., Sandler, M., and Stewart, R. (2019). Accuracy of Perceived Distance in VR Using Verbal Descriptors, Audio Engineering Society.
38. Zacharov, N., and Koivuniemi, K. (2001). Unravelling the Perception of Spatial Sound Reproduction: Language Development, Verbal Protocol Analysis and Listener Training, Audio Engineering Society.
39. Heckmann, M. (2014). OpenRepGrid: An R package for the analysis of repertory grids. R Package Version 0.1, 9.
40. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 ↗
41. Lavandier, C. (1989). Validation Perceptive d’un Modèle Objectif de Caractérisation de La Qualité Acoustique Des Salles. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Le Mans].
42. The Psychoacoustics of Apparent Source Width, Spaciousness and Envelopment in Performance Spaces
43. Loudness Constancy with Varying Sound Source Distance10.1038/82931 ↗
44. Distance Perception in Interactive Virtual Acoustic Environments Using First and Higher Order Ambisonic Sound Fields10.3813/AAA.918492 ↗
45. Auditory Distance Perception in Humans: A Review of Cues, Development, Neuronal Bases, and Effects of Sensory Loss10.3758/s13414-015-1015-1 ↗
46. Dependence of Binaural Masking Level Differences on Center Frequency, Masker Bandwidth, and Interaural Parameters10.1121/1.427942 ↗
47. Li, S., Schlieper, R., and Peissig, J. (2019). The Role of Reverberation and Magnitude Spectra of Direct Parts in Contralateral and Ipsilateral Ear Signals on Perceived Externalization. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9030460 ↗
48. Comparison of Concert Hall Measurements of Spatial Impression10.1121/1.410612 ↗
49. ISO 3382-1 (2009). Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 1: Performance Spaces, International Standard Organization.
50. Spatial Responsiveness in Concert Halls and the Origins of Spatial Impression10.1016/S0003-682X(00)00050-5 ↗
51. Effects of Frequency Characteristics of the Degree of Interaural Cross-Correlation and Sound Pressure Level on the Auditory Source Width
52. Measured Early Lateral Energy Fractions in Concert Halls and Opera Houses10.1006/jsvi.1999.2686 ↗
53. Beranek, L. (2004). Concert Halls and Opera Houses: Music, Acoustics, and Architecture, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-0-387-21636-2 ↗
54. The Effect of Loudness on the Reverberance of Music: Reverberance Prediction Using Loudness Models10.1121/1.3676602 ↗
55. Room Acoustical Quality of Concert Halls: Perceptual Factors and Acoustic Criteria—Return from Experience10.1260/1351-010X.20.4.265 ↗
56. Green, E., Kahle, E., Berrier, V., and Carayol, E. (2019). Beyond 80ms: The Subjective Effects of Sound Energy Arriving Shortly After the “Early” Sound Period, Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen.
57. The Role of Perceived Spatial Separation in the Unmasking of Speech10.1121/1.428211 ↗