journal article·2019-08-13Open access

Constructing Uyghur Commonsense Knowledge Base by Knowledge Projection

Azmat Anwar, Xiao Li, Yating Yang, Yajuan Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 16

Abstract

Although considerable effort has been devoted to building commonsense knowledge bases (CKB), it is still not available for many low-resource languages such as Uyghur because of expensive construction cost. Focusing on this issue, we proposed a cross-lingual knowledge-projection method to construct an Uyghur CKB by projecting ConceptNet’s Chinese facts into Uyghur. We used a Chinese–Uyghur bilingual dictionary to get high-quality entity translation in facts and employed a back-translation method to eliminate the entity-translation ambiguity. Moreover, to tackle the inner relation ambiguity in translated facts, we made a hand-crafted rule to convert the structured facts into natural-language phrases and built the Chinese–Uyghur lingual phrases based on the similarity of phrases that corresponded to the bilingual semantic similarity scoring model. Experimental results show that the accuracy of our semantic similarity scoring model reached 94.75% for our task, and they successfully project 55,872 Chinese facts into Uyghur as well as obtain 67,375 Uyghur facts within a very short period.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China

Xinjiang Laboratory of Minority Speech and Language Information Processing, Urumqi 830011, China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Department of Information Security Engineering, Xinjiang Police College, Urumqi 830011, China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. KBQA: Learning question answering over QA corpora and knowledge bases10.14778/3055540.3055549 ↗
2. Xiong, C., Power, R., and Callan, J. (2017, January 3–7). Explicit semantic ranking for academic search via knowledge graph embedding. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, Perth, Australia.10.1145/3038912.3052558 ↗
3. Commonsense reasoning and commonsense knowledge in artificial intelligence10.1145/2701413 ↗
4. Young, T., Cambria, E., Chaturvedi, I., Zhou, H., Biswas, S., and Huang, M. (2018, January 2–7). Augmenting end-to-end dialogue systems with commonsense knowledge. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11923 ↗
5. Ostermann, S., Roth, M., Modi, A., Thater, S., and Pinkal, M. (2018, January 5–6). SemEval-2018 Task 11: Machine comprehension using commonsense knowledge. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/S18-1119 ↗
6. Ma, Y., Peng, H., and Cambria, E. (2018, January 2–7). Targeted aspect-based sentiment analysis via embedding commonsense knowledge into an attentive LSTM. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12048 ↗
7. Qiu, L., and Zhang, H. (2017, January 21–24). Review of Development and Construction of Uyghur Knowledge Graph. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC), Guangzhou, China.10.1109/CSE-EUC.2017.181 ↗
8. Abaidulla, Y., Osman, I., and Tursun, M. (2009, January 15–16). Progress on Construction Technology of Uyghur Knowledge Base. Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Ubiquitous Computing & Education, Chengdu, China.10.1109/IUCE.2009.125 ↗
9. A survey on uyghur ontology10.14257/ijdta.2015.8.4.16 ↗
10. Speer, R., Chin, J., and Havasi, C. (2017, January 4–9). Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11164 ↗
11. Bharadwaj, A., Mortensen, D., Dyer, C., and Carbonell, J. (2016, January 1–5). Phonologically aware neural model for named entity recognition in low resource transfer settings. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Austin, TX, USA.10.18653/v1/D16-1153 ↗
12. Mayhew, S., Tsai, C.-T., and Roth, D. (2017, January 7–11). Cheap translation for cross-lingual named entity recognition. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/D17-1269 ↗
13. Xie, J., Yang, Z., Neubig, G., Smith, N.A., and Carbonell, J. (November, January 31). Neural Cross-Lingual Named Entity Recognition with Minimal Resources. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium.10.18653/v1/D18-1034 ↗
14. Chen, M., Tian, Y., Yang, M., and Zaniolo, C. (2016). Multilingual knowledge graph embeddings for cross-lingual knowledge alignment. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2017/209 ↗
15. Wang, Z., Lv, Q., Lan, X., and Zhang, Y. (November, January 31). Cross-lingual Knowledge Graph Alignment via Graph Convolutional Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium.10.18653/v1/D18-1032 ↗
16. Klein, P., Ponzetto, S.P., and Glavaš, G. (2017, January 3–7). Improving neural knowledge base completion with cross-lingual projections. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain.10.18653/v1/E17-2083 ↗
17. Xu, K., Wang, L., Yu, M., Feng, Y., Song, Y., Wang, Z., and Yu, D. (2019). Cross-lingual Knowledge Graph Alignment via Graph Matching Neural Network. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P19-1304 ↗
18. Faruqui, M., and Kumar, S. (June, January 31). Multilingual open relation extraction using cross-lingual projection. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver, CO, USA.10.3115/v1/N15-1151 ↗
19. Barnes, J., Klinger, R., and Walde, S.S. (2018, January 15–20). Bilingual sentiment embeddings: Joint projection of sentiment across languages. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne, Australia.10.18653/v1/P18-1231 ↗
20. Feng, X., Tang, D., Qin, B., and Liu, T. (2016, January 11–17). English-chinese knowledge base translation with neural network. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2016), Osaka, Japan.
21. Otani, N., Kiyomaru, H., Kawahara, D., and Kurohashi, S. (2018, January 20–26). Cross-lingual Knowledge Projection Using Machine Translation and Target-side Knowledge Base Completion. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
22. Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., and Birch, A. (2015). Improving neural machine translation models with monolingual data. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P16-1009 ↗
23. Munire, M., Li, X., and Yang, Y. (2019). Construction of the Uyghur Noun Morphological Re-Inflection Model Based on Hybrid Strategy. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9040722 ↗
24. Rules and Algorithms for Uyghur Affix Variant Collocation
25. Zhang, B., Xiong, D., Su, J., and Qin, Y. (2018). Alignment-Supervised Bidimensional Attention-Based Recursive Autoencoders for Bilingual Phrase Representation. IEEE Trans. Cybern.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10969 ↗
26. Zhang, B., Xiong, D., and Su, J. (2017, January 4–9). Battrae: Bidimensional attention-based recursive autoencoders for learning bilingual phrase embeddings. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10969 ↗
27. Socher, R., Pennington, J., Huang, E.H., Ng, A.Y., and Manning, C.D. (2011, January 27–31). Semi-supervised recursive autoencoders for predicting sentiment distributions. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Scotland, UK.
28. Wuebker, J., Mauser, A., and Ney, H. (2010, January 11–16). Training phrase translation models with leaving-one-out. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden.
29. Hübsch, O. (2017). Core Fidelity of Translation Options in Phrase-Based Machine Translation. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University].