Validation of a Numerical Model for the Prediction of the Annoyance Condition at the Operator Station of Construction Machines
Source abstract
Abstract
It is well-known that the reduction of noise levels is not strictly linked to the reduction of noise annoyance. Even earthmoving machine manufacturers are facing the problem of customer complaints concerning the noise quality of their machines with increasing frequency. Unfortunately, all the studies geared to the understanding of the relationship between multidimensional characteristics of noise signals and the auditory perception of annoyance require repeated sessions of jury listening tests, which are time-consuming. In this respect, an annoyance prediction model was developed for compact loaders to assess the annoyance sensation perceived by operators at their workplaces without repeating the full sound quality assessment but using objective parameters only. This paper aims at verifying the feasibility of the developed annoyance prediction model when applied to other kinds of earthmoving machines. For this purpose, an experimental investigation was performed on five earthmoving machines, different in type, dimension, and engine mechanical power, and the annoyance predicted by the numerical model was compared to the annoyance given by subjective listening tests. The results were evaluated by means of the squared value of the correlation coefficient, R2, and they confirm the possible applicability of the model to other kinds of machines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control · Effects of Vibration on Health · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Agricultural and Earthmoving Machines of the National Research Council of Italy (C.N.R.-IMAMOTER), 44124 Ferrara, Italy
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Why can a decrease in dB(A) produce an increase in loudness?10.1121/1.395162 ↗
2. Subjective evaluation of the noise at the operator’s ear position in earth moving machines: A preliminary investigation
3. L162 Directive 2000/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2000 on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States to Noise Emission in the Environment by Equipment for Use Outdoors. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2000.162.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2000:162:TOC.
4. L157 Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on Machinery, and Amending Directive 95/16/EC (Recast). Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2006.157.01.0024.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2006:157:TOC.
5. Siano, D. (2012). Noise Control, Reduction and Cancellation Solutions in Engineering, InTech. [1st ed.]. Available online: http://www.intechopen.com/books/noise-control-reduction-and-cancellation-solutions-in-engineering/from-noise-levels-to-sound-quality-the-successful-approach-to-improve-the-acoustic-comfort.10.5772/1375 ↗
6. Perspective of the sound quality approach applied to noise control in earth moving machines
7. Carletti, E., Casazza, C., and Pedrielli, F. (2007, January 2–7). Psychoacoustic characterisation of the noise at the operator position of a compact loader during real working conditions. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Acoustics ICA, Madrid, Spain.
8. Pedrielli, F., Carletti, E., and Casazza, C. (2008). Just noticeable differences of loudness and sharpness for earth moving machines. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 123.10.1121/1.2933219 ↗
9. Mapping perceptual attributes of sound to product design choices10.3397/1.2839723 ↗
10. Sound quality assessment of sewing machines10.3397/1.2888399 ↗
11. Sound quality evaluation of fan noise based on advanced hearing-related parameters10.3397/1.3159391 ↗
12. Kang, J., Hao, Y., Yang, M., and Lavia, L. (2015, January 12–16). Soundscape evaluation and indicators for delivery sound environment. Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration ICSV22, Florence, Italy. Abstract Number 971.
13. Experimental design and assessment of product sound quality: Application to a vacuum cleaner10.3397/1.2839720 ↗
14. Index for vehicle acoustical comfort inside a passenger car10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.11.001 ↗
15. Sound quality index for assessment of sound quality of laser printers based on a combination of sound metrics10.3397/1/3761047 ↗
16. Altinsoy, E., Gül, M., and Kuyumcuoglu, A. (2016, January 28). Washing machine sound quality. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration ICSV23, Athens, Greece. Abstract Number 868.
17. Development of an annoyance index for heavy-duty diesel engine noise using multivariate analysis10.3397/1.2828437 ↗
18. Development and validation of a numerical prediction model to estimate the annoyance condition at the operator station of compact loaders10.1080/10803548.2011.11076889 ↗
19. Evaluation of sound quality of wheel loaders using a human subject for binaural recording10.3397/1.2839683 ↗
20. On the method of paired comparisons10.1093/biomet/31.3-4.324 ↗
21. Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., Nizam, A., and Muller, K.E. (2007). Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, Duxbury Press. [4th ed.].
22. Dillon, W.R., and Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications, John Wiley & Sons. [1st ed.].
23. Reduction of noise in an excavator cabin using order tracking and ultrasonic leak detection10.3397/1.3207865 ↗
24. Experimental study of sources of noise from heavy earth-moving machinery10.3397/1.2839243 ↗
25. Sound-quality evaluation—A multi-layered problem