DataVXActa Mechanica Solida SinicaPaper
journal article·2026-04

Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Tunnel Boring Machine Rock Breaking via Multi-source Data Fusion

Xiaojun Yan, Wencong Qi, Chuan Qu, Minghui Ma, Shanglin Liu, Qian Zhang, Xuesong Cheng

Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica· Volume 39· Issue 4
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Drilling and Well Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang Q, Meng S, Zhong Z, Xie W, Guo Z, Jin H, et al. Big data in mechanical research: potentials, applications and challenges. Adv Mech. 2020;50(1):202011. https://doi.org/10.6052/1000-0992-19-002.10.6052/1000-0992-19-002 ↗
2. Zhang J, Yu J, Wei X, Zhou K, Niu W, Wei Y, et al. A soft scanning electron microscopy for efficient segmentation of alloy microstructures based on a new self-supervised pre-training deep learning network. Mater Charact. 2024;218:114532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2024.114532.10.1016/j.matchar.2024.114532 ↗
3. Liu Z, Gao Z, Qin W, Lv C, Hu W. Automatic detection of L12 phase in L12-strengthened high entropy alloy based on efficient channel attention and convolutional black attention U2-net. Mater Charact. 2025;225:115198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2025.115198.10.1016/j.matchar.2025.115198 ↗
4. Yuan B, Qiang H, Wang X, Chen T. Review of multi‐scale mechanical behavior research on composite solid propellants based on data‐driven approach. Propellants Explos Pyrotech. 2024;49(5):e202300287. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202300287.10.1002/prep.202300287 ↗
5. Ma Y, Deng C, Sun Z, Gong B, Liu Y. Prediction of sequential stress-strain fields in dual-phase steels via convolutional neural network. Mater Today Commun. 2025;46:112645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112645.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112645 ↗
6. Wang S, Xu A, Zhao R. Level-set-based topology optimization of a geometrically nonlinear structure considering thermo-mechanical coupling effect. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2025;38(1):100–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-024-00542-z.10.1007/s10338-024-00542-z ↗
7. Zhang Z, Shen J, Hu S, Chen Y, Yin C, Bu X. Optimization of CMT characteristic parameters for swing arc additive manufacturing of AZ91 magnesium alloy based on process stability analysis. Materials. 2023;16(8):3236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16083236.10.3390/ma16083236 ↗
8. Zhang J, Sui T, Lin B, Lv B, Du H, Song N. Quantification of micro-damage evolution process in ceramics through extensive analysis of multi-source heterogeneous data. Mater Des. 2024;237:112600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112600.10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112600 ↗
9. Jin Y, Wang H, Chugh T, Guo D, Miettinen K. Data-driven evolutionary optimization: an overview and case studies. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2019;23(3):442–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2018.2869001.10.1109/TEVC.2018.2869001 ↗
10. Song Z, Peng J, Zhu L, Deng C, Zhao Y, Guo Q, et al. High-cycle fatigue life prediction of additive manufacturing Inconel 718 alloy via machine learning. Materials. 2025;18(11):2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112604.10.3390/ma18112604 ↗
11. Xu L, Xiong L, Zhang R, Zheng J, Zou H, Li Z, et al. Data-enhanced low-cycle fatigue life prediction model based on nickel-based superalloys. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2025;38(4):612–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-024-00541-0.10.1007/s10338-024-00541-0 ↗
12. Zhu L, Guo H, Song Z, Liu Y, Peng J, Wang J. Machine learning-based fatigue life prediction for E36 steel welded joints. Materials. 2025;18(15):3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153481.10.3390/ma18153481 ↗
13. Mumuni A, Mumuni F. Data augmentation: a comprehensive survey of modern approaches. Array. 2022;16:100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2022.100258.10.1016/j.array.2022.100258 ↗
14. Sun X, Zhou K, Shi S, Song K, Chen X. A new cyclical generative adversarial network based data augmentation method for multiaxial fatigue life prediction. Int J Fatigue. 2022;162:106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106996.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106996 ↗
15. Yu W, Sun X, Yu Z, Chen X. Controllable data augmentation and application of multiaxial fatigue experiments by fatigue conditional generative adversative network model. Int J Fatigue. 2026;202:109216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109216.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109216 ↗
16. Feng C, Su M, Xu L, Zhao L, Han Y, Peng C. A novel generalization ability-enhanced approach for corrosion fatigue life prediction of marine welded structures. Int J Fatigue. 2023;166:107222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107222.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107222 ↗
17. Luleci F, Catbas FN, Avci O. Generative adversarial networks for labeled acceleration data augmentation for structural damage detection. J Civ Struct Health Monit. 2023;13(1):181–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00627-8.10.1007/s13349-022-00627-8 ↗
18. Zhu Q, Sun B, Zhou Y, Sun W, Xiang J. Sample augmentation for intelligent milling tool wear condition monitoring using numerical simulation and generative adversarial network. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2021;70:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2021.3077995.10.1109/tim.2021.3077995 ↗
19. Li H, Chen W, Tan X. Back analysis of geomechanical parameters based on a data augmentation algorithm and machine learning technique. Undergr Space. 2025;21:215–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2024.08.002.10.1016/j.undsp.2024.08.002 ↗
20. Ren B, Wang H, Wang D, Guan T, Zheng X. Vision method based on deep learning for detecting concrete vibration quality. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2023;18:e02132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02132.10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02132 ↗
21. Byun S, Yu J, Cheon S, Lee SH, Park SH, Lee T. Enhanced prediction of anisotropic deformation behavior using machine learning with data augmentation. J Magnesium Alloy. 2024;12(1):186–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2023.12.007.10.1016/j.jma.2023.12.007 ↗
22. Kim S, Shin H. Deep learning framework for multiscale finite element analysis based on data-driven mechanics and data augmentation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2023;414:116131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116131.10.1016/j.cma.2023.116131 ↗
23. Shan X, Liu Y, Cao W, Sun X, Zhang W. Turbulence modeling via data assimilation and machine learning for separated flows over airfoils. AIAA J. 2023;61:3883–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J062711.10.2514/1.J062711 ↗
24. Liao H, Sun X, Liu Y, Zhang W. Data-driven turbulence modeling: a mutually coupled framework for symbolic regression and data assimilation. Phys Fluids. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0280752.10.1063/5.0280752 ↗
25. Gazzola L, Ferronato M, Frigo M, Janna C, Teatini P, Zoccarato C, et al. A novel methodological approach for land subsidence prediction through data assimilation techniques. Comput Geosci. 2021;25(5):1731–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-021-10062-1.10.1007/s10596-021-10062-1 ↗
26. Amavasai A, Tahershamsi H, Wood T, Dijkstra J. Data assimilation for bayesian updating of predicted embankment response using monitoring data. Comput Geotech. 2024;165:105936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105936.10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105936 ↗
27. Lin M, Lin B, Yang W, Shen Y, Zhang X, Liu T, et al. A data assimilation method for blast load prediction. Simul Model Pract Theory. 2023;129:102840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102840.10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102840 ↗
28. Imperiale A, Chapelle D, Moireau P. Sequential data assimilation for mechanical systems with complex image data: application to tagged-MRI in cardiac mechanics. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-020-00179-w.10.1186/s40323-020-00179-w ↗
29. Spratt JS, Rodriguez M, Schmidmayer K, Bryngelson SH, Yang J, Franck C, et al. Characterizing viscoelastic materials via ensemble-based data assimilation of bubble collapse observations. J Mech Phys Solids. 2021;152:104455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104455.10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104455 ↗
30. Cheng S, Zhuang Y, Kahouadji L, Liu C, Chen J, Matar OK, et al. Multi-domain encoder–decoder neural networks for latent data assimilation in dynamical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2024;430:117201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117201.10.1016/j.cma.2024.117201 ↗
31. Wang H, Song X, Zhang C. Multifidelity data fusion mechanism for digital twins via the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput. 2025;29(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2024.3483831.10.1109/MIC.2024.3483831 ↗
32. Xie F, Zhang X, Wu S, Ji T, Zheng Y. Multi-fidelity bayesian neural networks for aerodynamic data fusion with heterogeneous uncertainties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2025;435:117666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117666.10.1016/j.cma.2024.117666 ↗
33. Chen H, Chen J, Li Z, Liu Y, Wang J. Digital twin modeling enabling structure full field data reconstruction by variable fidelity data fusion. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2025;230:112619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112619.10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112619 ↗
34. Callaghan JS, Crump DA, Nielsen AS, Thomsen O, Dulieu-Barton JM. Quantitative full-field data fusion for evaluation of complex structures. Exp Mech. 2023;63(7):1095–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-023-00973-8.10.1007/s11340-023-00973-8 ↗
35. Song L, Wang D, Liu X, Yin A, Long Z. Prediction of mechanical properties of composite materials using multimodal fusion learning. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2023;358:114433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2023.114433.10.1016/j.sna.2023.114433 ↗
36. Wang B, Li Z, Xu Z, Sun Z, Tian K. Digital twin modeling for structural strength monitoring via transfer learning-based multi-source data fusion. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2023;200:110625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110625.10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110625 ↗
37. Luo C, Liu L, Hussin S, Luo Y. Stability analysis of tunnel rock mechanical parameters based on multi-source sensor data fusion. J Comb Math Comb Comput. 2024;120:155–67. https://doi.org/10.61091/jcmcc120-13.10.61091/jcmcc120-13 ↗
38. Xue Y, Wang J, Zhou M, Liu J, Guo Y, Wang J. Prediction of optimum TBM penetration strategy with minimum energy consumption in hard rocks. Comput Geotech. 2022;148:104844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104844.10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104844 ↗
39. Xu H, Geng Q, Sun Z, Qi Z. Full-scale granite cutting experiments using tunnel boring machine disc cutters at different free-face conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2021;108:103719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103719.10.1016/j.tust.2020.103719 ↗
40. Deng L, Li X, Xu W, Zhang C, Zhuang Q, Li F, et al. Full-scale test of disc cutter rotary cutting in TBM tunnelling: a case study of mawan granite in Shenzhen, China. Geomech Geophys Geo-energ Geo-res. 2024;10(1):167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00886-3.10.1007/s40948-024-00886-3 ↗
41. Zhang H, Xia M, Huang F, Zhang Z. Research on rock-breaking characteristics of cutters and matching of cutter spacing and penetration for tunnel boring machine. Buildings. 2024;14(6):1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061757.10.3390/buildings14061757 ↗
42. Yang Y, Cheng H, Liu M, Haeri H, Fu J, Hou R. Numerical investigation of rock-breaking force analysis of TBM disk-cutters. Strength Mater. 2024;56(2):419–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-024-00659-z.10.1007/s11223-024-00659-z ↗
43. Chakeri H, Maleki A, Shakeri H, Darbor M, Mousapour H. Laboratory and numerical investigation of cutting tool performance using a new small-scale linear cutting machine. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):22337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08401-8.10.1038/s41598-025-08401-8 ↗
44. Yang F. Development of a TBM rock breaking test equipment. Master’s Degree Thesis. Tianjin University; 2017.
45. Qi W, Qu C, Yan X, Kang Y, Zhang Q. Excavation load analysis and efficiency optimization of TBM by multi-disc cutter rotary rock-breaking. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2025;29(11):100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kscej.2025.100249.10.1016/j.kscej.2025.100249 ↗