journal article·2024-10-11Open access

Assessing Soil Physical Quality in a Layered Agricultural Soil: A Comprehensive Approach Using Infiltration Experiments and Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar Surveys

Simone Di Prima, Gersende Fernandes, Maria Burguet, Ludmila Ribeiro Roder, Vittoria Giannini, Filippo Giadrossich, Laurent Lassabatere, Alessandro Comegna

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

Time-lapse ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys, combined with automated infiltration experiments, provide a non-invasive approach for investigating the distribution of infiltrated water within the soil medium and creating three-dimensional images of the wetting bulb. This study developed and validated an experimental protocol aimed at quantifying and visualizing water distribution fluxes in layered soils under both unsaturated and saturated conditions. The 3D images of the wetting bulb significantly enhanced the interpretation of infiltration data, enabling a detailed analysis of water movement through the layered system. We used the infiltrometer data and the Beerkan Estimation of Soil Transfer parameters (BEST) method to determine soil capacitive indicators and evaluate the physical quality of the upper soil layer. The field survey involved conducting time-lapse GPR surveys alongside infiltration experiments between GPR repetitions. These experiments included both tension and ponding tests, designed to sequentially activate the soil matrix and the full pore network. The results showed that the soil under study exhibited significant soil aeration and macroporosity (represented by AC and pMAC), while indicators related to microporosity (such as PAWC and RFC) were notably low. The RFC value of 0.55 m3 m−3 indicated the soil’s limited capacity to retain water relative to its total pore volume. The PAWC value of 0.10 m3 m−3 indicated a scarcity of micropores ranging from 0.2 to 30 μm in diameter, which typically hold water accessible to plant roots within the total porosity. The saturated soil hydraulic conductivity, Ks, values ranged from 192.2 to 1031.0 mm h−1, with a mean of 424.4 mm h−1, which was 7.9 times higher than the corresponding unsaturated hydraulic conductivity measured at a pressure head of h = −30 mm (K−30). The results indicated that the upper soil layer supports root proliferation and effectively drains excess water to the underlying limestone layer. However, this layer has limited capacity to store and supply water to plant roots and acts as a restrictive barrier, promoting non-uniform downward water movement, as revealed by the 3D GPR images. The observed difference in hydraulic conductivity between the two layers suggests that surface ponding and overland flow are generated through a saturation excess mechanism. Water percolating through the soil can accumulate above the limestone layer, creating a shallow perched water table. During extreme rainfall events, this water table may rise, leading to the complete saturation of the soil profile.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences (DAFE), University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy

Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, UMR 5023 LEHNA, 69518 Vaulx-en-Velin, France

Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39A, 07100 Sassari, Italy

Dipartimento per l’Innovazione Umanistica, Scientifica e Sociale (DIUSS), University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy

Architecture, Design and Urban Planning, University of Sassari, Piazza Duomo, 6, 07041 Alghero (Sassari), Italy

School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Fazenda Experimental Lageado, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment—DAFNAE, University of Padua, Agripolis Campus, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro (Padova), Italy

Funding

European Union—Next Generation EU

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Environmental Impact of Different Agricultural Management Practices: Conventional vs. Organic Agriculture10.1080/07352689.2011.554355 ↗
2. Doran, J.W., and Parkin, T.B. (1994). Defining and Assessing Soil Quality. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.2136/sssaspecpub35 ↗
3. Soil Quality—A Critical Review10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 ↗
4. Using Static and Dynamic Indicators to Evaluate Soil Physical Quality in a Sicilian Area10.1002/ldr.2263 ↗
5. Temporal Effects of Food Waste Compost on Soil Physical Quality and Productivity10.4141/cjss-2014-114 ↗
6. Beerkan Estimation of Soil Transfer Parameters through Infiltration Experiments—BEST10.2136/sssaj2005.0026 ↗
7. Soil Structure as an Indicator of Soil Functions: A Review10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009 ↗
8. Quantifying Preferential Flow in Soils: A Review of Different Techniques10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013 ↗
9. Monitoring Infiltration Processes with High-Resolution Surface-Based Ground-Penetrating Radar
10. Truss, S., Grasmueck, M., Vega, S., and Viggiano, D.A. (2007). Imaging Rainfall Drainage within the Miami Oolitic Limestone Using High-Resolution Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar. Water Resour. Res., 43.10.1029/2005WR004395 ↗
11. Subsurface Lateral Preferential Flow Network Revealed by Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar in a Hillslope10.1002/2013WR014603 ↗
12. Form and Function in Hillslope Hydrology: In Situ Imaging and Characterization of Flow-Relevant Structures10.5194/hess-21-3749-2017 ↗
13. Detecting Infiltrated Water and Preferential Flow Pathways through Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar Surveys10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138511 ↗
14. Field Measurement of Soil Surface Hydraulic Properties by Disc and Ring Infiltrometers. A Review and Recent Developments10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00098-2 ↗
15. Estimating Macroporosity in a Forest Watershed by Use of a Tension Infiltrometer10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x ↗
16. Soil Hydraulic Properties Determined by Infiltration Experiments and Different Heights of Water Pouring10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.032 ↗
17. A Test of the Single- and Double-Ring Types of Infiltrometers10.1029/TR037i002p00189 ↗
18. Automated Single Ring Infiltrometer with a Low-Cost Microcontroller Circuit10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.022 ↗
19. Beerkan Multi-Runs for Characterizing Water Infiltration and Spatial Variability of Soil Hydraulic Properties across Scales10.1080/02626667.2018.1560448 ↗
20. Rapid Measurement of Field-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity for Areal Characterization10.2136/vzj2007.0159 ↗
21. Evaluating Subsurface Flow Connectivity in a Pine-Covered Hillslope with Stemflow Infiltration and Ground-Penetrating Radar Surveys10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129527 ↗
22. Exploring the Interplay between Infiltration Dynamics and Critical Zone Structures with Multiscale Geophysical Imaging: A Review10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114431 ↗
23. Preferential Flow through Shallow Fractured Bedrock and a 3D Fill-and-Spill Model of Hillslope Subsurface Hydrology10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.070 ↗
24. BEST-2K Method for Characterizing Dual-Permeability Unsaturated Soils with Ponded and Tension Infiltrometers10.2136/vzj2018.06.0124 ↗
25. Experimental Assessment of a New Comprehensive Model for Single Ring Infiltration Data10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.077 ↗
26. Physical Attributes of Soil Quality. Soil Quality for Crop Production and Ecosystem Health
27. Land Management Effects on the Near-Surface Physical Quality of a Clay Loam Soil10.1016/j.still.2007.07.003 ↗
28. An Open-Source Instrumentation Package for Intensive Soil Hydraulic Characterization10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124492 ↗
29. Testing a New Automated Single Ring Infiltrometer for Beerkan Infiltration Experiments10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.006 ↗
30. (2024, October 08). Automatic Treatment of Raw Data from Automatized Infiltrometer. Available online: https://youtu.be/nXXxNS3gmCA?si=q6zwfXtiiJb3EXTg.
31. A Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x ↗
32. Comparing Alternative Algorithms to Analyze the Beerkan Infiltration Experiment10.2136/sssaj2013.06.0231 ↗
33. Relative Permeability Calculation from Pore Size Distribution Data
34. Estimating the Macroscopic Capillary Length from Beerkan Infiltration Experiments and Its Impact on Saturated Soil Hydraulic Conductivity Predictions10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125159 ↗
35. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Infiltration from the Disc Infiltrometer: 2. Physically Based Infiltration Equation10.1029/94WR01788 ↗
36. Beerkan Estimation of Soil Transfer Parameters (BEST) across Soils and Scales10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.007 ↗
37. Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Bagarello, V., Iovino, M., and Lassabatère, L. (2016). Infiltration Measurements for Soil Hydraulic Characterization, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-31788-5 ↗
38. Stability Analysis of Infiltration10.2136/sssaj1975.03615995003900060013x ↗
39. Determination of Soil Sorptivity and Hydraulic Conductivity from the Disk Infiltrometer10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040005x ↗
40. Klute, A. (1986). Particle-Size Analysis. SSSA Book Series, American Society of Agronomy. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods.10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed ↗
41. Kirkwood, T.B. (1979). Geometric Means and Measures of Dispersion, JSTOR.
42. Use of Indicators and Pore Volume-Function Characteristics to Quantify Soil Physical Quality10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.009 ↗
43. Al-Nuaimy, W., Huang, Y., Shihab, S., and Eriksen, A. (2002, January 12). Automatic Target Detection in GPR Data. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. Available online: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/4758/1/Automatic-target-detection-in-GPR-data/10.1117/12.462232.short.10.1117/12.462232 ↗
44. Hydrological Connectivity of Soil Pipes Determined by Ground-Penetrating Radar Tracer Detection10.1002/esp.1039 ↗
45. Use of Four-Dimensional Ground Penetrating Radar and Advanced Visualization Methods to Determine Subsurface Fluid Migration10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00060-9 ↗
46. RockWare Inc. (2019, August 08). RockWorks17 User’s Manual. Available online: https://www.rockware.com/downloads/documentation/rockworks/rockworks17.pdf.
47. An Integrative Approach for Preliminary Environmental Engineering Investigations amidst Reclaiming Desert-Land: A Case Study at East Nile Delta, Egypt10.1007/s12665-017-6627-4 ↗
48. The Sacred Canals of the Temple of Bastet at Bubastis (Egypt): New Findings from Geomorphological Investigations and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT)
49. Prospecting for Clay Minerals within Volcanic Successions: Application of Electrical Resistivity Tomography to Characterise Bentonite Deposits in Northern Sardinia (Italy)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.09.014 ↗
50. Comparison of Three Field Methods to Characterize Apparent Macropore Conductivity10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800020003x ↗
51. Effect of the Settlement of Sediments on Water Infiltration in Two Urban Infiltration Basins10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.031 ↗
52. A Note on the Use of the Philip Infiltration Equation10.1071/SR9760103 ↗
53. Infiltration and Macroporosity of a Silt Loam Soil under Two Contrasting Tillage Systems
54. An Analytical Approach to Ascertain Saturation-excess versus Infiltration-excess Overland Flow in Urban and Reference Landscapes10.1002/hyp.13562 ↗
55. Runoff from Heterogeneous Small Bare Catchments during Soil Surface Sealing10.1029/2005WR004592 ↗
56. Rainfall Induced Soil Seal (B) Application of a New Model to Saturated Soils10.1016/0341-8162(90)90009-3 ↗
57. Rainfall-Induced Soil Surface Sealing: A Critical Review of Observations, Conceptual Models, and Solutions
58. SPAD Readings and Associated Leaf Traits in Durum Wheat, Barley and Triticale Cultivars10.1023/A:1015878719389 ↗
59. Using Cover Crops to Mitigate and Adapt to Climate Change. A Review10.1007/s13593-016-0410-x ↗
60. Adoption of Cover Crops by U.S. Soybean Producers10.1017/aae.2019.20 ↗
61. Straw Mulch as a Sustainable Solution to Decrease Runoff and Erosion in Glyphosate-Treated Clementine Plantations in Eastern Spain. An Assessment Using Rainfall Simulation Experiments10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.007 ↗