journal article·2024-08-20Open access

Conceptual Design of Seismic Retrofit of Existing Bridges by Deck Isolation: Assessment of Effectiveness

Carlo Pettorruso, Virginio Quaglini

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 16

Abstract

The creation of an isolation layer between decks and substructures has turned out to be a viable method for reducing the seismic vulnerability of existing bridges. However, to the Authors’ knowledge, a practical approach for a preliminary verification of the effectiveness of this intervention is lacking. The paper introduces a practical tool for a preliminary assessment of the needs of the rehabilitation of the bridge and of the effectiveness of the deck isolation to improve its seismic performance by comparing the demands of the as-built structure and of the piers alone, expressed in terms of equivalent accelerations, to the maximum seismic acceleration allowed to maintain the substructure behavior in the elastic range. A practical implementation of the criterion is illustrated in a parametric study, considering prototypes of simply supported and continuous deck bridges with features common to the bridges of the Italian stock. The results of the study provide some indications about the inherent weaknesses of the examined pier typologies and the positive effect of the dead load of the deck on the effectiveness of deck isolation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy

Funding

Italian Department of Civil Protection (DPC)

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Development of Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies over the Past 30 Years
2. Seismic risk assessment of residential buildings in Italy10.1007/s10518-020-01009-5 ↗
3. Seismic reliability of base isolated systems: Sensitivity to design choices10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114056 ↗
4. Seismic reliability of Italian code-conforming bridges10.1002/eqe.3958 ↗
5. Bridge seismic response as a function of the Friction Pendulum System (FPS) modeling assumptions10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.032 ↗
6. Seismic isolation of highway bridges
7. Comparative seismic fragility assessment of an existing isolated continuous bridge retrofitted with different energy dissipation devices10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001425 ↗
8. Seismic performance assessment of a retrofitted bridge with natural rubber isolators in cold weather environments using fragility surfaces10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001873 ↗
9. Conceptual design of isolation systems for bridge structures10.1080/13632469708962366 ↗
10. A direct displacement-based method for the seismic design of bridges on bi-linear isolation devices10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.016 ↗
11. Seismic isolation of bridges using isolation systems based on flat sliding bearings10.1007/s10518-007-9044-3 ↗
12. Applied Technology Council (1996). ATC-40: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council. Report No. SSC 96-01.
13. Direct displacement-based design of seismically isolated bridges10.1007/s10518-008-9069-2 ↗
14. Design and optimization of seismic isolation and damping devices for highway bridges based on probabilistic repair cost ratio10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002139 ↗
15. Definition of a simplified design procedure of seismic isolation systems for bridges10.1080/10168664.2020.1775535 ↗
16. An improved equivalent energy-based design procedure for seismic isolation system of simply supported bridge in China’s high-speed railway10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106161 ↗
17. Deformation-based design of seismically isolated bridges10.1002/eqe.3721 ↗
18. Issues in the upgrade of Italian highway structures10.1080/13632461003649970 ↗
19. Seismic vulnerability of the Italian roadway bridge stock10.1193/070413EQS190M ↗
20. Italian Council of Public Works (2018). Technical Standards on Constructions. Italian Council of Public Works. (In Italian).
21. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1).
22. (2005). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 2: Bridges (Standard No. EN 1998–2).
23. Pettorruso, C. (2024). Strategies for the Rehabilitation of Existing Bridges by Seismic Isolation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Milano].
24. Italian Railway Agency (2020). Manuale di Progettazione Delle Opere Civili Parte II: Ponti e Strutture, Italian Railway Agency. (In Italian).
25. Angotti, F. (2011). Dettagli Costruttivi di Strutture in Calcestruzzo Armato, AICAP Italian Association for Structural Concrete. (In Italian).
26. Cyclic tests on large-scale models of existing bridge piers with rectangular hollow cross-section10.1002/eqe.311 ↗
27. Pettorruso, C., and Quaglini, V. (2024). Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Procedures for the Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Straight Multi-Span RC Bridges. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14020464 ↗
28. Shear effects on hollow section piers under seismic actions: Experimental and numerical analysis10.1007/s10518-008-9098-x ↗
29. Gelfi, P. (2024, June 06). Verifica Cemento Armato allo Stato Limite Ultimo (VCASLU). Available online: https://gelfi.unibs.it/software/programmi_studenti.html.
30. (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1992-1-1).
31. Seismic retrofitting of highway bridges in Illinois using friction pendulum seismic isolation bearings and modeling procedures10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00062-2 ↗
32. Efficiency of seismic isolation for seismic retrofitting of heavy substructure bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:4(429) ↗
33. Computers & Structures Inc. (2016). SAP 2000 CSI Analysis Reference Manual, Computers & Structures Inc.