New Display Technologies: The Most Desired Usage Properties and Their Perception during Product Interaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Display technologies influence user experience, not only through the perception of product features but also due to their own usage properties. In this work, 12 functional, usable, pleasuring, and media usage properties were analysed for five display technologies: image rendering, 360° rotation, and augmented, immersive, and non-immersive virtual reality. The perception of their importance and their assessment for the chosen technologies were studied by taking two different household products. Two variables for studying decision and expectations were also considered. The results showed that 360° rotation was well-valued in various properties, mainly related to functionality and usability, while the immersive virtual technology stood out in media properties and also in the most important feature: realism. It was also seen that the results could depend on the displayed product. These results provide a deeper insight for user experience optimisation because they complement the information to choose the most appropriate display technology based on the properties to be prioritised.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Color perception and design · Augmented Reality Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló, Spain
Funding
Universitat Jaume I
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Revisiting Trends in Augmented Reality Research: A Review of the 2nd Decade of ISMAR (2008–2017)10.1109/TVCG.2018.2868591 ↗
2. How Virtual Reality Shopping Experience Enhances Consumer Creativity: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Curiosity10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113378 ↗
3. Zhu, T. (2022, January 17–21). The Impact of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Technologies on Consumers’ Behaviors in Real Estate: A Website’s Perspective. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct, ISMAR-Adjunct, Singapore.10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct57072.2022.00013 ↗
4. Feasibility and User Experience of Virtual Reality Fashion Stores10.1186/s40691-018-0149-x ↗
5. Seeing Things: Consumer Response to the Visual Domain in Product Design10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001 ↗
6. Evaluation of the User Emotional Experience on Bicycle Saddle Designs via a Multi-Sensory Approach10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103039 ↗
7. Perception of Products by Progressive Multisensory Integration. A Study on Hammers10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.014 ↗
8. “I Am Not Satisfied with My Body, so I like Augmented Reality (AR)”: Consumer Responses to AR-Based Product Presentations10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.041 ↗
9. Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Technologies in Real Estate: How Customer Experience Drives Attitudes toward Properties and the Service Provider10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102175 ↗
10. Berni, A., and Borgianni, Y. (2020). Applications of Virtual Reality in Engineering and Product Design: Why, What, How, When and Where. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9071064 ↗
11. Palacios-Ibáñez, A., Felip-Miralles, F., Galán, J., García-García, C., and Contero, M. (2023). Consumer Subjective Impressions in Virtual Reality Environments: The Role of the Visualization Technique in Product Evaluation. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12143051 ↗
12. Felip, F., Galán, J., Contero, M., and García-García, C. (2023). Touch Matters: The Impact of Physical Contact on Haptic Product Perception in Virtual Reality. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042649 ↗
13. The Influence of Haptics When Assessing Household Products Presented in Different Means: A Comparative Study in Real Setting, Flat Display, and Virtual Reality Environments with and without Passive Haptics
14. Determining Fidelity of Mixed Prototypes: Effect of Media and Physical Interaction10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.007 ↗
15. The Influence of Hand Tracking and Haptic Feedback for Virtual Prototype Evaluation in the Product Design Process10.1115/1.4055952 ↗
16. Agost, M.-J., Vergara, M., and Bayarri-Porcar, V. (2024). Perceiving Design Features in New Interaction Environments: Comparing Rendered Images, 360° Rotation, AR, Immersive and Non-Immersive VR, and Real Product Interaction. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114470 ↗
17. Development of a Virtual Reality System Usability Questionnaire (VRSUQ)10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104319 ↗
18. Picardi, A., and Caruso, G. (2024). User-Centered Evaluation Framework to Support the Interaction Design for Augmented Reality Applications. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 8.10.3390/mti8050041 ↗
19. Unveiling the Metaverse: A Survey of User Perceptions and the Impact of Usability, Social Influence and Interoperability10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31413 ↗
20. A Sentiment Analysis Approach for Understanding Users’ Perception of Metaverse Marketplace
21. Determinants of the Intention to Adopt Mobile Augmented Reality Apps in Shopping Malls among University Students10.3390/jtaer16030030 ↗
22. Al-Suqri, M.N., and Al-Aufi, A.S. (1989). Technology Acceptance Model: TAM. Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends, IGI Global.
23. Augmented Reality: Research Agenda for Studying the Impact of Its Media Characteristics on Consumer Behaviour10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.02.004 ↗
24. Making Online Products More Tangible: The Effect of Product Presentation Formats on Product Evaluations10.1089/cyber.2015.0520 ↗
25. Jordan, P.W. (2000). Designing Pleasurable Products, CRC Press.10.4324/9780203305683 ↗
26. The Use of New Presentation Technologies in Electronic Sales Environments and Their Influence on Product Perception
27. Zhang, S., and Li, W. (2024, January 19–21). Applying EXtended Reality(XR) Technology in Commerce, Management, and Business Applications: A Survey. Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Computer, Control and Robotics (ICCCR), Shnaghai, China.10.1109/ICCCR61138.2024.10585599 ↗
28. We ARe at Home: How Augmented Reality Reshapes Mobile Marketing and Consumer-Brand Relationships10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.004 ↗
29. Liao, Y.-C., Wang, T.-H., Koong Lin, H.-C., and Lin, K.-Y. (2018). Innovative Technologies and Learning, Proceedings of the Augmented Reality Applied to Smartphones and Wearable Devices—Virtual Furniture Simulation System, Portoroz, Slovenia, 27–30 August 2018, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-99737-7_50 ↗
30. Virtual Reality as an Educational Tool for Elementary School
31. Improved Virtual Reality Perception with Calibrated Stereo and Variable Focus for Industrial Use10.1007/s12008-017-0377-0 ↗
32. A Model for Predicting the GEARS Score from Virtual Reality Surgical Simulator Metrics10.1007/s00464-018-6082-7 ↗
33. Testing the Efficacy of a Virtual Reality-Based Simulation in Enhancing Users’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Empathy Relating to Psychosis10.1111/ajpy.12167 ↗
34. Shopping in Virtual Reality: A Literature Review and Future Agenda10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.075 ↗
35. Augmented Reality Technologies, Systems and Applications10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6 ↗
36. The Effects of Online Product Presentation on Consumer Responses: A Mental Imagery Perspective10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.006 ↗
37. Relationship between Meanings, Emotions, Product Preferences and Personal Values. Application to Ceramic Tile Floorings10.1016/j.apergo.2014.01.008 ↗
38. Framework of Product Experience
39. Crowdsourcing Augmented Reality Environment (CARE) for Aesthetic Evaluation of Products in Conceptual Stage10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.028 ↗
40. On the Application of Extended Reality Technologies for the Evaluation of Product Characteristics during the Initial Stages of the Product Development Process10.1016/j.compind.2022.103780 ↗
41. Van Damme, S., Tack, J., Van Wallendael, G., De Turck, F., and Vega, M.T. (2023). Are We Ready for Haptic Interactivity in VR?. An Experimental Comparison of Different Interaction Methods in Virtual Reality Training. In Proceedings of the 2023 15th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2023, Ghent, Belgium, 20–22 June 2023, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.10.1109/QoMEX58391.2023.10178453 ↗
42. Design and User Experience Analysis of AR Intelligent Virtual Agents on Smartphones10.1016/j.cogsys.2022.11.007 ↗
43. Gattullo, M., Laviola, E., Evangelista, A., Fiorentino, M., and Uva, A.E. (2022). Towards the Evaluation of Augmented Reality in the Metaverse: Information Presentation Modes. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412600 ↗
44. How Usability and User Experience Vary among the Basic M-Commerce, AR and VR Based User Interfaces of Mobile Application for Online Shopping
45. Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: An Investigation of Technology Acceptance Drivers10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690 ↗
46. Technology Acceptance Modeling of Augmented Reality at the Point of Sale: Can Surveys Be Replaced by an Analysis of Online Reviews?10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.011 ↗
47. Haugstvedt, A.C., and Krogstie, J. (2012, January 5–8). Mobile Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage: A Technology Acceptance Study. Proceedings of the ISMAR 2012—11th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2012, Atlanta, GA, USA. Science and Technology Papers.10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402563 ↗
48. The Role of Perceived Enjoyment in the Students’ Acceptance of an Augmented Reality Teaching Platform: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach10.24846/v19i3y201011 ↗
49. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View10.2307/30036540 ↗
50. Ahmad, M.I. (2015). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). A Decade of Validation and Development. LinkedIn Pulse, 179–211.
51. Stewart, D.W., and Pavlou, P.A. (2009). The Effects of Media on Marketing Communications. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, Taylor and Francis.
52. Littlejohn, S.W., and Foss, K.A. (2010). Theories of Human Communication: Tenth Edition, Waveland Press, Inc.
53. Nabi, R.L., and Oliver, M.B. (2009). Media Effects 2.0: Social and Psychological Effects. The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects, SAGE Publications Inc.
54. Mobile Marketing: A Synthesis and Prognosis10.1016/j.intmar.2009.02.002 ↗
55. Interactive Technologies and Retailing Strategy: A Review, Conceptual Framework and Future Research Directions10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.004 ↗
56. Descriptive Epidemiology of Some Rare Neurological Diseases in Benghazi, Libya10.1159/000110150 ↗
57. Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x ↗