journal article·2024-06-28Open access

Geomechanical Characterization of a Brazilian Experimental Site: Testing, Interpretation, and Material Properties

Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino, Yamid E. Nuñez de la Rosa, Marcos Massao Futai

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 13

Abstract

Clarity in monitoring existing foundation structures demands innovative safety analysis methodologies for deep foundations, necessitating advanced models calibrated with real-world field parameters. Understanding controlled conditions, including geotechnical profiles, seismic attributes, and soil mechanics, is crucial. A dedicated research group at the University of São Paulo spent three years refining these conditions, characterizing an experimental field along a canal in São Paulo. This study pioneers geotechnical and geomechanical characterization of the region’s tertiary sediments in São Paulo, offering valuable insights for current and future applications. Standard penetration tests with torque (SPT-Torque), piezocone tests (CPTu), and measurement of wave velocity (Vs) with piezocone tests (S-CPTu) were carried out. The exploration of the subsoil shows that in up to 2 m of excavation, there are clays and silts, and in up to 25 m, there is a significant layer of compact fine sand that has high values of tip resistance and wave velocities more significant than 100 m/s. In the electric cone tests, the abacus used displayed a reasonable classification. All propositions identified the transition from the surface soil to the sandy soil at between 3 and 25 m. The soil classification values were obtained with the data of the field parameters, and the geotechnical and mechanical parameters were estimated. No differences were detected among the values found in the SPT-T and CPTu tests for the values obtained via cone resistance. This demonstrates the reliability of both methods. In addition, using the CPTu test to identify the stratigraphic profile horizons employing the soil’s mechanical behavior when the cone is driven proved appropriate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Program, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia

Faculty of Engineering and Basic Sciences, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Bogota 110231, Colombia

Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Ave. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 380, Cidade Universitária, Butantã 05508-010, SP, Brazil

Funding

Rail Project · The Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores—Colombia (FULL)

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Cavalcante, E., Danziger, F., Giacheti, H., Coutinho, R., and Souza, A. (2007). Campos Experimentais Brasileiros. Geotecnia, 99–205.10.14195/2184-8394_111_3 ↗
2. Correlations between SPT, CPT, and Vs for Reclaimed Lands near Dubai10.1007/s10706-022-02143-4 ↗
3. Feasibility of Stochastic Gradient Boosting Approach for Evaluating Seismic Liquefaction Potential Based on SPT and CPT Case Histories10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001292 ↗
4. Odebrecht, E., Mantaras, F.M.B., and Schnaid, F. (2018, January 21–22). A Method for Predicting the Undrained Shear Strength from Piezocone Dissipation Test. Proceedings of the Cone Penetration Testing 2018—4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT 2018, Delft, The Netherlands.
5. Robertson, P.K. (2010, January 9–11). Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: An Update. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Hundtington Beach, CA, USA.
6. Robertson, P.K., Fear, C.E., Woeller, D.J., and Weemees, I. (1995, January 25–27). Estimation of Sand Compressibility from Seismic CPT. Proceedings of the 48th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
7. Eslaamizaad, S., and Robertson, P.K. (1997, January 20–22). Evaluation of Settlement of Footings on Sand from Seismic In-Sity Tests. Proceedings of the 50th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
8. Schnaid, F. (2005, January 12–16). Geo-Characterisation and Properties of Natural Soils by in Situ Tests. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Geotechnology in Harmony with the Global Environment, Osaka, Japan.
9. Bayesian Mixture Analysis of a Global Database to Improve Unit Weight Prediction from CPTu10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107353 ↗
10. A Probabilistic Bayesian Methodology for the Strain-Rate Correction of Dynamic CPTu Data10.1139/cgj-2022-0311 ↗
11. A Simple Approach to Probabilistic CPTu-Based Geotechnical Stratigraphic Profiling10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105905 ↗
12. Boschi, K., Arroyo, M., Monforte, L., Carbonell, J.M., and Gens, A. (2024). Coupled Hydromechanical Modelling of Cone Penetration in Layered Liquefiable Soils. Géotechnique, 1–15.10.1680/jgeot.23.00164 ↗
13. Statistical Assessment of Simplified CPTU-Based Hydraulic Conductivity Curves
14. Usefulness of the CPTU Method in Evaluating Shear Modulus G0changes in the Subsoil10.2478/sgem-2021-0008 ↗
15. Development and Validation of a Method to Predict the Soil Thermal Conductivity Using Thermal Piezocone Penetration Testing (T-CPTU)10.1139/cgj-2021-0034 ↗
16. Geotechnical Characteristic Assessments of Floodplain Soils Using SCPTU Data in Nanjing, China10.1155/2022/1669511 ↗
17. A Relation between Undrained CPTu Results and the State Parameter for Liquefiable Soils10.1139/cgj-2022-0377 ↗
18. Nandi, S., Bandyopadhyay, K., Basu, D., and Shiuly, A. (2024). Correlation of Pressuremeter Test Results with SPT N Values and Liquidity Index for Cohesive Soil of Normal Calcutta Deposit. Indian Geotech. J.10.1007/s40098-023-00842-0 ↗
19. Identification of Geotechnical Units in Soil Exploration through Principal Component Analysis and Clustering10.1002/nag.3704 ↗
20. Site-Specific Correlation between Geotechnical and Geoelectrical Properties of Soil Deposits in India10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105288 ↗
21. Puttiwongrak, A., Keo, S., Vann, S., Arpornthip, T., Suteerasak, T., and Sukontasukkul, P. (2023). Geological and Climatic Factors Affecting the Correlation between Electrical Resistivity and SPT N-Value in Sandy Soils of Phuket, Thailand. Geosciences, 13.10.3390/geosciences13060185 ↗
22. Resistivity Correlations with SPT-N and Shear Wave Velocity for Patna Soil in India10.1007/s40098-020-00492-6 ↗
23. A New Approach to the Correlation of SPT-CPT Depending on the Soil Behavior Type Index10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.106996 ↗
24. Maximum Shear Modulus Estimative from SPT for Some Brazilian Tropical Soils10.28927/SR.2023.005222 ↗
25. Gamino, A.L., Hune, R.P., Santos, R.R., de Bragança, C.S.C., Bittencourt, T.N., Carvalho, H., and Futai, M.M. (2023). Dynamic Analysis of a Pedestrian Bridge Using Monitoring and Computational Techniques. Preprints.10.20944/preprints202311.0951.v1 ↗
26. Soil-Structure Interaction Approach of a Timber-Concrete Composite Pedestrian Bridge10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1261 ↗
27. Investigation on the Thermal Response of Steel Pipe Energy Piles with Different Backfill Materials10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.105 ↗
28. In-Field Performance of Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Energy Piles with Different Configurations10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120113 ↗
29. (2015). Standard Test Method for Performing the Flat Plate Dilatometer (Standard No. ASTM D6635-15).
30. British Standards Institution (2009). Eurocode 7 Geotechnical Design. Part 1. Structural Engineer, (Together with United Kingdom National Application Document), British Standards Institution.
31. (2020). Solo—Sondagem de Simples Reconhecimento Com SPT—Método de Ensaio (Standard No. ABNT ABNT NBR 6484).
32. (2019). Projeto e Execução de Fundações (Standard No. NBR NBR 6122).
33. Lunne, T., Powell, J.J.M., and Robertson, P.K. (2002). Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice, CRC Press.10.1201/9781482295047 ↗
34. Interpretation of the Seismic Cone Test in Granular Soils10.1680/geot.2007.57.3.265 ↗
35. Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests—A Unified Approach10.1139/T09-065 ↗
36. Cone Penetration Test (CPT)-Based Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) Classification System—An Update10.1139/cgj-2016-0044 ↗
37. Robertson, P.K., and Cabal, K.L. (2010). Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for Geotechnical Engineering, Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc.
38. Classification and State-Parameter Assessment of Granular Soils Using the Seismic Cone10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002306 ↗
39. (1995). Rochas e Solos (Standard No. ABNT NBR 6502).
40. (2011). Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) (Standard No. ASTM ASTM D2487).
41. Undrained Fragility of Clean Sands, Silty Sands, and Sandy Silts10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:10(849) ↗