journal article·2024-06-26Open access

Investigating Spatiotemporal Effects of Back-Support Exoskeletons Using Unloaded Cyclic Trunk Flexion–Extension Task Paradigm

Pranav Madhav Kuber, Ehsan Rashedi

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 13

Abstract

Back-Support Industrial Exoskeletons (BSIEs) are designed to reduce muscle effort during repetitive tasks that involve trunk bending. We recruited twelve participants to perform 30 cycles of 45° trunk bending with/without the assistance of BSIEs and with/without postural asymmetry, first without any back fatigue, and then at the medium–high level of perceived back fatigue. To study the benefits of BSIEs, the effects of being in a fatigued state were assessed by comparing the muscle demands, kinematics, and stability measures during bending, retraction, and their transition portions per cycle across the study conditions. Overall, the BSIEs caused a minimal decrease in the lower-back activity (0–1.8%), caused by the increased demands during the retraction portion. A substantial decrease in leg activity was observed (10–18%). Asymmetry increased the right-lower-back and leg demands. Medium–high fatigue caused an increase in the lower-back activity (8–12%) during bending and retraction. The BSIEs caused slower movements and improved the stability by lowering the maximum distance of the Center of Pressure (COP) during the transition portion, as well as by lowering the mean velocity of the COP during the bending/retraction portions. This controlled study demonstrated the use of a cyclic trunk flexion–extension paradigm to study the effects of BSIEs, and the outcomes can help with understanding the temporal effects of using BSIEs on physiological measures, ultimately benefiting their proper implementation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023). Employer Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
2. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2021). Projections Overview and Highlights, 2020–2030, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
3. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024, January 26). 2016 Survey of Occupational Injuries & Illnesses, Available online: https://www.bls.gov/iif/nonfatal-injuries-and-illnesses-tables/soii-summary-historical/soii-charts-2016.pdf.
4. The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Muscle Activity, Discomfort and Endurance Time in Forward Bending Work10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003 ↗
5. Effectiveness of an On-Body Lifting Aid at Reducing Low Back Physical Demands during an Automotive Assembly Task: Assessment of EMG Response and User Acceptability10.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.006 ↗
6. High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications10.1089/soro.2016.0030 ↗
7. Effect of Trunk Flexion Angle and Time on Lumbar and Abdominal Muscle Activity While Wearing a Passive Back-Support Exosuit Device during Simple Posture-Maintenance Tasks10.1080/00140139.2023.2191908 ↗
8. Evaluation of Trunk-Supporting Exoskeleton10.1177/1071181319631261 ↗
9. Effects of Industrial Back-Support Exoskeletons on Body Loading and User Experience: An Updated Systematic Review10.1080/00140139.2020.1870162 ↗
10. Versatile and Non-Versatile Occupational Back-Support Exoskeletons: A Comparison in Laboratory and Field Studies10.1017/wtc.2021.9 ↗
11. The Effect of a Passive Trunk Exoskeleton on Metabolic Costs during Lifting and Walking10.1080/00140139.2019.1602288 ↗
12. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting10.1080/24725838.2021.2005720 ↗
13. The Effect of Control Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton on Spine Loading and Kinematics during Lifting10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.044 ↗
14. The Effect of On-Body Lift Assistive Device on the Lumbar 3D Dynamic Moments and EMG during Asymmetric Freestyle Lifting10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.012 ↗
15. A Systematic Review on Evaluation Strategies for Field Assessment of Upper-Body Industrial Exoskeletons: Current Practices and Future Trends10.1007/s10439-022-03003-1 ↗
16. An Adaptable Human Fatigue Evaluation System10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.131 ↗
17. The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale10.1093/occmed/kqx063 ↗
18. Stastny, P., Gołaś, A., Blazek, D., Maszczyk, A., Wilk, M., Pietraszewski, P., Petr, M., Uhlir, P., and Zajac, A. (2017). A Systematic Review of Surface Electromyography Analyses of the Bench Press Movement Task. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0171632 ↗
19. Effects of Two Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons on Postural Balance during Quiet Stance and Functional Limits of Stability10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102516 ↗
20. Repetitive Lifting Tasks Fatigue the Back Muscles and Increase the Bending Moment Acting on the Lumbar Spine10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00086-4 ↗
21. Therapeutic Effects of Reaching with Forward Bending of Trunk on Postural Stability, Dynamic Balance, and Gait in Individuals with Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke10.1589/jpts.27.2447 ↗
22. Impact of Two Postural Assist Exoskeletons on Biomechanical Loading of the Lumbar Spine10.1016/j.apergo.2018.09.006 ↗
23. Biomechanical Evaluation of Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons in a Precision Manual Assembly Task: “Expected” Effects on Trunk Muscle Activity, Perceived Exertion, and Task Performance10.1177/0018720819890966 ↗
24. Product Ergonomics in Industrial Exoskeletons: Potential Enhancements for Workforce Safety and Efficiency10.1080/1463922X.2020.1850905 ↗
25. Kuber, P.M., Kulkarni, A.R., and Rashedi, E. (2024). Machine Learning-Based Fatigue Level Prediction for Exoskeleton-Assisted Trunk Flexion Tasks Using Wearable Sensors. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114563 ↗
26. Effects of a Passive Back-Support Exosuit on Erector Spinae and Abdominal Muscle Activity During Short-Duration, Asymmetric Trunk Posture Maintenance Tasks10.1177/00187208231197264 ↗
27. (2023, October 03). SENIAM Project (Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles). Available online: http://www.seniam.org/.
28. (2023, October 03). VICON Nexus Documentation. Available online: https://docs.vicon.com/display/Nexus212/Nexus+Documentation.
29. Ergonomic Evaluation of a Wearable Assistive Device for Overhead Work10.1080/00140139.2014.952682 ↗
30. Hefferle, M., Snell, M., and Kluth, K. (2021). Influence of Two Industrial Overhead Exoskeletons on Perceived Strain—A Field Study in the Automotive Industry, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-51758-8_13 ↗
31. Kuber, P.M., Godbole, H., and Rashedi, E. (2024). Detecting Fatigue during Exoskeleton-Assisted Trunk Flexion Tasks: A Machine Learning Approach. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14093563 ↗
32. Surface Electromyography Signal Processing and Classification Techniques10.3390/s130912431 ↗
33. A Passive Back Exoskeleton Supporting Symmetric and Asymmetric Lifting in Stoop and Squat Posture Reduces Trunk and Hip Extensor Muscle Activity and Adjusts Body Posture—A Laboratory Study10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103530 ↗
34. SPEXOR Passive Spinal Exoskeleton Decreases Metabolic Cost during Symmetric Repetitive Lifting10.1007/s00421-019-04284-6 ↗
35. Goršič, M., Song, Y., Dai, B., and Novak, D. (2021). Evaluation of the HeroWear Apex Back-Assist Exosuit during Multiple Brief Tasks. J. Biomech., 126.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110620 ↗
36. Passive Shoulder Exoskeleton Support Partially Mitigates Fatigue-Induced Effects in Overhead Work10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103903 ↗
37. Evaluation of a Trunk Supporting Exoskeleton for Reducing Muscle Fatigue10.1177/1071181319631491 ↗
38. Influence of a Passive Lower-Limb Exoskeleton during Simulated Industrial Work Tasks on Physical Load, Upper Body Posture, Postural Control and Discomfort10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.018 ↗
39. Long-Term Muscle Fatigue after Standing Work10.1177/0018720815590293 ↗
40. Benchmarking Occupational Exoskeletons: An Evidence Mapping Systematic Review10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103582 ↗
41. A Systematic Review on Lower—Limb Industrial Exoskeletons: Evaluation Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions10.1007/s10439-023-03242-w ↗