journal article·2024-06-10Open access

Novel Prognostic Methodology of Bootstrap Forest and Hyperbolic Tangent Boosted Neural Network for Aircraft System

Shuai Fu, Nicolas P. Avdelidis

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 12

Abstract

Complex aviation systems’ integrity deteriorates over time due to operational factors; hence, the ability to forecast component remaining useful life (RUL) is vital to their optimal operation. Data-driven prognostic models are essential for system RUL prediction. These models benefit run-to-failure datasets the most. Thus, significant factors that could affect systematic integrity must be examined to quantify the operational component of RUL. To expand predictive approaches, the authors of this research developed a novel method for calculating the RUL of a group of aircraft engines using the N-CMAPSS dataset, which provides simulated degradation trajectories under real flight conditions. They offered bootstrap trees and hyperbolic tangent NtanH(3)Boost(20) neural networks as prognostic alternatives. The hyperbolic tangent boosted neural network uses damage propagation modelling based on earlier research and adds two accuracy levels. The suggested neural network architecture activates with the hyperbolic tangent function. This extension links the deterioration process to its operating history, improving degradation modelling. During validation, models accurately predicted observed flight cycles with 95–97% accuracy. We can use this work to combine prognostic approaches to extend the lifespan of critical aircraft systems and assist maintenance approaches in reducing operational and environmental hazards, all while maintaining normal operation. The proposed methodology yields promising results, making it suitable for adoption due to its relevance to prognostic difficulties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IVHM Centre, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK

Funding

European Commission under the Marie Skłodowska Curie program through the H2020 ETN MOIRA project

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. An Ensembled Remaining Useful Life Prediction Method with Data Fusion and Stage Division10.1016/j.ress.2023.109804 ↗
2. Scott, M.J., Verhagen, W.J.C., Bieber, M.T., and Marzocca, P. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Predictive Maintenance for Defence Fixed-Wing Aircraft Sustainment and Operations. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22187070 ↗
3. A Critique of Reliability Prediction Techniques for Avionics Applications10.1016/j.cja.2017.11.004 ↗
4. Multi-Task Learning Boosted Predictions of the Remaining Useful Life of Aero-Engines under Scenarios of Working-Condition Shift10.1016/j.ress.2023.109350 ↗
5. Fu, S., and Avdelidis, N.P. (2023). Prognostic and Health Management of Critical Aircraft Systems and Components: An Overview. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23198124 ↗
6. Feature Fusion Model Based Health Indicator Construction and Self-Constraint State-Space Estimator for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Bearings in Wind Turbines10.1016/j.ress.2023.109124 ↗
7. Similarity Based Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on Gaussian Process with Active Learning10.1016/j.ress.2023.109461 ↗
8. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What We Know and What Is Left to Attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 ↗
9. Predictive Maintenance Modelling for Through-Life Engineering Services10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.033 ↗
10. Aero-Engine Remaining Useful Life Prediction Method with Self-Adaptive Multimodal Data Fusion and Cluster-Ensemble Transfer Regression10.1016/j.ress.2023.109151 ↗
11. (2024, March 11). Bootstrap Aggregating. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bootstrap_aggregating&oldid=1223807758.
12. A Comparison among Interpretative Proposals for Random Forests
13. (2024, March 11). Boosting (Machine Learning). Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boosting_(machine_learning)&oldid=1222981999.
14. Supervised Machine Learning for Theory Building and Testing: Opportunities in Operations Management10.1002/joom.1228 ↗
15. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.-Y. (2017, January 4–9). LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
16. Points of Significance: Ensemble Methods: Bagging and Random Forests10.1038/nmeth.4438 ↗
17. BoostTree and BoostForest for Ensemble Learning
18. Lee, T.-H., Ullah, A., and Wang, R. (2020). Bootstrap Aggregating and Random Forest. Macroeconomic Forecasting in the Era of Big Data, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-31150-6_13 ↗
19. Review of Deep Learning: Concepts, CNN Architectures, Challenges, Applications, Future Directions10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 ↗
20. Multi-Objective Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach for Fault Diagnosis of Aerospace Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064976 ↗
21. Optimisation and Performance Evaluation of Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in the Prediction of Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME)10.1016/j.energy.2022.126449 ↗
22. On the Approximation of Functions by Tanh Neural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2021.08.015 ↗
23. Wide and Deep Neural Networks Achieve Consistency for Classification10.1073/pnas.2208779120 ↗
24. Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmark10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.111 ↗
25. Jagtap, A.D., and Karniadakis, G.E. (2022). How Important Are Activation Functions in Regression and Classification? A Survey, Performance Comparison, and Future Directions. arXiv.
26. (2024, March 22). List of Things Named after Carl Friedrich Gauss. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_things_named_after_Carl_Friedrich_Gauss&oldid=1223714204.
27. Condition Monitoring Using Machine Learning: A Review of Theory, Applications, and Recent Advances10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119738 ↗
28. Chao, M.A., Kulkarni, C., Goebel, K., and Fink, O. (2021). Aircraft Engine Run-to-Failure Dataset under Real Flight Conditions for Prognostics and Diagnostics. Data, 6.10.3390/data6010005 ↗
29. Prognostics and Health Management: A Review on Data Driven Approaches10.1155/2015/793161 ↗
30. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Bearings Using Ensemble Learning: The Impact of Diversity in Base Learners and Features10.1115/1.4048215 ↗