journal article·2024-04-12Open access

Effect of Face Masks on Automatic Speech Recognition Accuracy for Mandarin

Xiaoya Li, Ke Ni, Yu Huang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 8

Abstract

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has been widely used to realize daily human–machine interactions. Face masks have become everyday wear in our post-pandemic life, and speech through masks may have impaired the ASR. This study explored the effects of different kinds of face masks (e.g., surgical mask, KN95 mask, and cloth mask) on the Mandarin word accuracy of two ASR systems with or without noises. A mouth simulator was used to play speech audio with or without wearing a mask. Acoustic signals were recorded at distances of 0.2 m and 0.6 m. Recordings were mixed with two noises at a signal-to-noise ratio of +3 dB: restaurant noise and speech-shaped noise. Results showed that masks did not affect ASR accuracy without noise. Under noises, masks did not significantly influence ASR accuracy at 0.2 m but had significant effects at 0.6 m. The activated-carbon mask had the most significant impact on ASR accuracy at 0.6 m, reducing the accuracy by 18.5 percentage points compared to that without a mask, whereas the cloth mask had the least effect on ASR accuracy at 0.6 m, reducing the accuracy by 0.9 percentage points. The acoustic attenuation of masks on the high-frequency band at around 3.15 kHz of the speech signal attributed to the effects of masks on ASR accuracy. When training ASR models, it may be important to consider mask robustness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Speech and Audio Processing · Hearing Impairment and Communication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Vibration, Shock and Noise, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Participation in Research Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Bai, J. (People’s Daily, 2023). Wear masks scientifically to protect public health, People’s Daily, p. 004.
2. Design and Implementation of the Voice Command Recognition and the Sound Source Localization System for Human–Robot Interaction10.1017/S0263574720001496 ↗
3. Integration of a voice recognition system in a social robot10.1080/01969722.2011.583593 ↗
4. Performing predefined tasks using the human–robot interaction on speech recognition for an industrial robot10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103903 ↗
5. Irugalbandara, I.B.C., Naseem, A.S.M., Perera, M.S.H., and Logeeshan, V. (2022, January 6–9). HomeIO: Offline Smart Home Automation System with Automatic Speech Recognition and Household Power Usage Tracking. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/AIIoT54504.2022.9817282 ↗
6. Intelligent automobile auxiliary propagation system based on speech recognition and AI driven feature extraction techniques10.1007/s10772-022-09958-9 ↗
7. Robot Dialog System in the Context of Hospital Receptionist and its Demonstration10.1007/s12369-021-00861-y ↗
8. Pranto, S.I., Nabid, R.A., Samin, A.M., Mohammed, N., Sarker, F., Huda, M.N., and Mamun, K.A. (2021, January 22–24). Human-Robot Interaction in Bengali language for Healthcare Automation integrated with Speaker Recognition and Artificial Conversational Entity. Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Electrical & Electronic Engineering (ICEEE), Rajshahi, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICEEE54059.2021.9718797 ↗
9. Effect of masks on speech intelligibility in auralized classrooms10.1121/10.0002450 ↗
10. Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals10.1121/10.0002279 ↗
11. Impact of face masks on voice radiation10.1121/10.0002853 ↗
12. Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise10.1121/1.1907309 ↗
13. The effects of surgical masks on speech perception in noise10.1121/1.4800719 ↗
14. Speech intelligibility assessment of protective facemasks and air-purifying respirators10.1080/15459624.2016.1200723 ↗
15. The cafeteria study: Effects of facial masks, hearing protection, and real-world noise on speech recognition10.1121/10.0008898 ↗
16. The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss10.3766/jaaa.15151 ↗
17. Speech Understanding Using Surgical Masks: A Problem in Health Care?10.3766/jaaa.19.9.4 ↗
18. Bandela, S.R., Sadhu, S.S., Rathore, V.S., and Jagini, S.K. (2023, January 6–8). Development of Noise Robust Automatic Speech Recognition System. Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Delhi, India.10.1109/ICCCNT56998.2023.10307271 ↗
19. Robot Ego-Noise Suppression with Labanotation-Template Subtraction10.1002/tee.23523 ↗
20. Estimate the noise effect on automatic speech recognition accuracy for mandarin by an approach associating articulation index10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109217 ↗
21. Feng, S., Kudina, O., Halpern, B.M., and Scharenborg, O. (2021). Quantifying Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition, Cornell University Library.
22. Decoupling and Interacting Multi-Task Learning Network for Joint Speech and Accent Recognition10.1109/TASLP.2023.3332542 ↗
23. Barcovschi, A., Jain, R., and Corcoran, P. (2023, January 25–27). A comparative analysis between Conformer-Transducer, Whisper, and wav2vec2 for improving the child speech recognition. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), Bucharest, Romania.10.1109/SpeD59241.2023.10314867 ↗
24. Personalized Adversarial Data Augmentation for Dysarthric and Elderly Speech Recognition10.1109/TASLP.2023.3323888 ↗
25. Shi, M., Zhang, J., Du, Z., Yu, F., Chen, Q., Zhang, S., and Dai, L.R. (November, January 31). A Comparative Study on Multichannel Speaker-Attributed Automatic Speech Recognition in Multi-party Meetings. Proceedings of the 2023 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/APSIPAASC58517.2023.10317185 ↗
26. (2022). Information Technology-Intelligent Speech Interaction Testing Method-Part 1: Speech Recognition (Standard No. GB/T 41813.1-2022).
27. (2011). Surgical Mask (Standard No. YY 0469-2011).10.1055/s-0030-1259789 ↗
28. (2021). Disposable Protective Face Mask (Non-Medical) (Standard No. Q/JY001-2021).
29. (2010). Technical Requirements for Protective Face Mask for Medical Use (Standard No. GB 19083-2010).
30. (2019). Respiratory Protection—Non-Powered Air-Purifying Particle Respirator (Standard No. GB 2626-2019).
31. Bu, H., Du, J., Na, X., Wu, B., and Zheng, H. (2017, January 1–3). AISHELL-1: An open-source Mandarin speech corpus and a speech recognition baseline. Proceedings of the 2017 20th Conference of the Oriental Chapter of the International Coordinating Committee on Speech Databases and Speech I/O Systems and Assessment (O-COCOSDA), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICSDA.2017.8384449 ↗
32. The average spectrum of Chinese speech
33. (1987). The Standard Spectrum of Chinese Speech (Standard No. GB/T 7347-1987).
34. Chu, C. (CNKI, 2016). Mask, who works best? When should we wear it? How to maintain?, CNKI, p. 016.
35. Inward and outward effectiveness of cloth masks, a surgical mask, and a face shield10.1080/02786826.2021.1890687 ↗
36. Toscano, J.C., and Toscano, C.M. (2021). Effects of face masks on speech recognition in multi-talker babble noise. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0246842 ↗
37. Moore, B. (2003). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, Academic Press. [5th ed.].
38. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception10.1121/1.2804952 ↗
39. Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols10.1121/10.0002873 ↗
40. Kim, S., Arora, A., Le, D., Yeh, C.-F., Fuegen, C., Kalinli, O., and Seltzer, M.L. (2021). Semantic Distance: A New Metric for ASR Performance Analysis Towards Spoken Language Understanding, Cornell University Library.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-1929 ↗
41. Rugayan, J., Svendsen, T., and Salvi, G. (2022). Semantically Meaningful Metrics for Norwegian ASR Systems. Interspeech, 2283–2287.10.21437/Interspeech.2022-817 ↗