Prediction of Utility Tunnel Performance in a Soft Foundation during an Operation Period Based on Deep Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
The underground utility tunnel in a soft foundation is generally affected by the serious disturbance of the vehicle load during the operation period. Therefore, in this study, for the typical utility tunnel engineering in Suqian City of Jiangsu Province, China, field tests were conducted to monitor the performance of the utility tunnel structure in a soft foundation affected by the ground traffic loads during the operation period. Based on the test results, the datasets whose number is 15,376, composed of the five main disturbance factors (four vehicle operating load parameters and one operating time parameter), and the corresponding two main structure responses (displacement and stress) have been constructed. Based on the obtained datasets, using the proposed new deep learning model called WO-DBN, in which the seven hyperparameters of a deep belief network (DBN) are determined by the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), the safety responses of the utility tunnel structure have been predicted. The results show that for the prediction results, the average absolute error for the displacement is 0.1604, and for the stress, it is 12.3726, which are not significant and can meet the requirement of the real engineering. Therefore, the deep learning model can accurately predict the performance of the utility tunnel structure under a vehicle load and other disturbances, and the model has good applicability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
Alameda College, Peralta Community College District, Oakland, CA 94606, USA
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. History and recent development of multi-purpose utility tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2020.103511 ↗
2. Discussion on the Development of Underground Utility Tunnels in China10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.698 ↗
3. Evaluation of blast-resistant ability of shallow-buried rein-forced concrete urban utility tunnel10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105003 ↗
4. Blast resistance evaluation of urban utility tunnel reinforced with BFRP bars10.1016/j.dt.2020.03.015 ↗
5. Investigating the dynamic response of a double-box utility tunnel buried in calcareous sand against ground surface explosion10.1016/j.tust.2024.105636 ↗
6. Experimental and numerical investigation on the cross-sectional mechanical behavior of prefabricated multi-cabin RC utility tunnels10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.025 ↗
7. Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Peng, C., Lei, Y., Zhang, A., Zuo, Z., and Chen, Z. (2023). Experimental and Numerical Investigation into Full-Scale Model of New Type Assembled Integral Utility Tunnel. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13061428 ↗
8. Xue, W., Chen, S., and Wang, Q. (2024). Cyclic Loading Test Conducted on the Bottom Joints of a Hybrid Precast Utility Tunnel Composed of Double-Skin Sidewalls and a Precast Bottom Slab. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14020341 ↗
9. Experimental study on out-of-plane seismic performance of precast composite sidewalls of utility tunnel with grouting-sleeve joints10.1016/j.undsp.2023.10.004 ↗
10. Xue, W., Chen, S., and Bai, H. (2023). Pseudo-Static Tests on Top Joints of Hybrid Precast Utility Tunnel. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13102567 ↗
11. Transverse response of utility tunnel under near fault ground motions: Multi-shake table array tests10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108135 ↗
12. Shaking table investigations on seismic performance of prefabricated corrugated steel utility tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2020.103579 ↗
13. Yao, A., Tian, T., Gong, Y., and Li, H. (2023). Shaking Table Tests of Seismic Response of Multi-Segment Utility Tunnels in a Layered Liquefiable Site. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15076030 ↗
14. Shaking table tests on the seismic performance of prefabricated T-shaped cross utility tunnel10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105516 ↗
15. Seismic response of utility tunnel in horizontal nonhomogeneous site based on improved discrete element method10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105179 ↗
16. Shaking table test and numerical simulation on seismic performance of prefabricated corrugated steel utility tunnels on liquefiable ground10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106527 ↗
17. Response characteristics of rectangular tunnels in soft soil subjected to transversal ground shaking10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.003 ↗
18. Structural behavior and soil arching state of underground corrugated steel utility tunnel10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107798 ↗
19. Prefabricated UHPC-concrete-ECC underground utility tunnel reinforced by perforated steel plate: Experimental and numerical investigations
20. Influence of oblique incidence of P-waves on seismic response of prefabricated utility tunnels considering joints10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107797 ↗
21. Numerical study on the behavior of utility tunnel subjected to ground surface explosion10.1016/j.tws.2020.107422 ↗
22. A BIM-based framework for operation and maintenance of utility tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2019.103252 ↗
23. Yang, L., Zhang, F., Yang, F., Qian, P., Wang, Q., Wu, Y., and Wang, K. (2023). Generating Topologically Consistent BIM Models of Utility Tunnels from Point Clouds. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23146503 ↗
24. A LSTM-RNN based intelligent control approach for temperature and humidity environment of urban utility tunnels10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13182 ↗
25. An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Urban Underground Utility Tunnels10.1016/j.ress.2021.107792 ↗
26. Risk assessment of utility tunnels through risk interaction-based deep learning10.1016/j.ress.2023.109626 ↗
27. Formulation of multi-hazard damage prediction (MhDP) model for tunnelling projects in earthquake and landslide-prone regions: A novel approach with artificial neural networking (ANN)10.1007/s12040-023-02178-y ↗
28. A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 ↗
29. Gong, B., Shu, C., Han, S., and Cheng, S.-G. (2021). Mine Vegetation Identification via Ecological Monitoring and Deep Belief Network. Plants, 10.10.3390/plants10061099 ↗
30. Ground Settlement of High-Permeability Sand Layer Induced by Shield Tunneling: A Case Study under the Guidance of DBN10.1155/2020/6617468 ↗
31. A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
32. The whale optimization algorithm10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
33. Predicting tunnel squeezing using support vector machine opti-mized by whale optimization algorithm10.1007/s11440-022-01450-7 ↗
34. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
35. Machine learning approach for predicting compressive strength in foam concrete under varying mix designs and curing periods10.1007/s44268-023-00021-3 ↗
36. Prediction of underground mining-induced subsidence: Artificial neural network based approach10.33271/mining17.04.045 ↗
37. Kim, Y., and Lee, S.S. (2020). Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Assessing Mining Subsidence Risk. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041302 ↗
38. Yang, T., Wen, T., Huang, X., Liu, B., Shi, H., Liu, S., Peng, X., and Sheng, G. (2024). Predicting Model of Dual-Mode Shield Tunneling Parameters in Complex Ground Using Recurrent Neural Networks and Multiple Optimization Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020581 ↗
39. He, Y., and Chen, Q. (2023). Construction and Application of LSTM-Based Prediction Model for Tunnel Surrounding Rock Deformation. Sustainability, 15.10.21203/rs.3.rs-2304142/v1 ↗