Parameter and Topology Optimization of Structures in the Frequency Domain under Nevanlinna–Pick Interpolation Constraints
Source abstract
Abstract
The design optimization of structures can be conducted in either the time domain or the frequency domain. The frequency domain approach is advantageous compared to its time domain counterpart, especially if the degree of freedom is large, the objectives and/or constraints are formulated in the frequency domain, or the structure is subject to random loading. In this paper, an attempt is undertaken to obtain feasible optimal solutions by implementing the Nevanlinna–Pick (NP) interpolation theory across multi-objective structural optimization problems in the frequency domain. The NP equations introduce a trade-off that originates from the interpolation theory for complex variables. According to the NP theory, a complex function cannot have an independent amplitude from its derivative at a certain frequency. Consequently, the frequency response of a physical system cannot be shaped arbitrarily at discrete frequencies. Our objectives within this paper include calculating the weight, natural frequency, fatigue life, frequency domain response, and its derivative. To illustrate our claims, sample parameter and topology optimization problems were formulated and solved, both with and without the NP constraints. It was found that the inclusion of NP constraints induced a considerable improvement in the optimal solutions, while also causing the convergence to the optimal solution to become smoother.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34437, Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kırklareli University, Istanbul 39020, Turkey
Department of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Turkey
Funding
Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) · Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Projects (BAP) division
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Golnaraghi, F., and Kuo, B.C. (2010). Automatic Control Systems, McGraw-Hill Education.
2. Suspension Optimization by a frequency domain equivalent optimal control algorithm10.1016/0022-460X(89)90924-3 ↗
3. The optimal design of dynamic absorber in the time domain and the frequency domain10.1016/0003-682X(89)90032-7 ↗
4. Optimization for vehicle suspension II: Frequency domain10.1080/00423119008968948 ↗
5. Kathe, E.L. (1996, January 14–16). Design of passive vibration absorber to reduce terrain-induced gun barrel vibration in the frequency domain. US Army Armament Research Development and Engineering Center. Proceedings of the Eighth US Army Symposium on Gun Dynamics, Newport, RI, USA.
6. Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1272) ↗
7. Topology Optimization Of Truss Structure With Fundamental Frequency and Frequency Domain Dynamic Response Constraints10.1007/s10338-006-0628-2 ↗
8. Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017 ↗
9. Structural topology optimization for frequency response problem using model reduction schemes10.1016/j.cma.2010.02.002 ↗
10. Aerodynamic shape optimization of hovering rotor blades using a non-linear frequency domain approach10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.06.014 ↗
11. Using Krylov-Pade model order reduction for accelerating design optimization of structures and vibrations in the frequency domain10.1002/nme.3357 ↗
12. Topology optimization considering fatigue life in the frequency domain10.1016/j.camwa.2015.08.006 ↗
13. Topology optimization of damping material for reducing resonance response based on complex dynamic compliance10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.045 ↗
14. Optimum tuned mass damper design in frequency domain for structures10.1007/s12205-016-0829-2 ↗
15. Methodology for the simultaneous optimization of location and parameters of friction dampers in the frequency domain
16. Pillai, A.C., Thies, P.R., and Johanning, L. (2018, January 4–7). Comparing frequency and time domain simulations for geometry optimization of a floating offshore wind turbine mooring system. Proceedings of the ASME 1st International Offshore Wind Technical Conference, IOWTC 2018, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1115/IOWTC2018-1006 ↗
17. Optimum design of tuned mass dampers using colliding bodies optimization in frequency domain10.1007/s40996-019-00296-6 ↗
18. Vibration-based material properties identification of a car seat frame in time and frequency domains using multi-objective genetic algorithm10.1007/s00158-021-03136-2 ↗
19. Shape feature controlled topology optimization of attached piezoelectric actuators for vibration control of thin-walled smart structures10.1016/j.apm.2023.03.018 ↗
20. Designing the dynamic behavior of an engine suspension system through genetic algorithms10.1115/1.1383968 ↗
21. Reducing response of structures by using optimum composite tuned mass dampers10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.499 ↗
22. Optimal design of passive linear suspension using genetic algorithm10.1016/j.jsv.2003.07.007 ↗
23. Structural topology and shape optimization for a frequency response problem10.1007/BF00370133 ↗
24. Integrated topology optimization for vibration suppression in a vertical pump
25. Pham-Truong, T., Kawamura, Y., and Okada, T. (2023). Bisection Constraint Method for Multiple-Loading Conditions in Structural Topology Optimization. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132413005 ↗
26. Multi-objective optimization by genetic algorithm of structural systems subject to random vibrations10.1007/s00158-008-0330-8 ↗
27. Optimal design of vibro-impact resistant fiber reinforced composite plates with polyurea coating10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115680 ↗
28. Multiobjective adaptive symbiotic organisms search for truss optimization problems10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.005 ↗
29. Differential evolution with the adaptive penalty method for structural multi-objective optimization10.1007/s11081-018-9395-4 ↗
30. Nan, B., Bai, Y., and Wu, Y. (2020). Multi-objective optimization of spatially truss structures based on node movement. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10061964 ↗
31. A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and algorithms in mechanical engineering problems10.1007/s11831-021-09663-x ↗
32. Comfort improvement of a nonlinear suspension using global optimization and in situ measurements10.1016/j.jsv.2004.07.010 ↗
33. Novel multi-objective topology optimization method for stiffness and stress of continuum structures
34. Structural optimization with fatigue life constraints10.1016/0013-7944(90)90057-N ↗
35. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue constraints in structural optimization10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.032 ↗
36. Fatigue constrained topology optimization10.1007/s00158-014-1054-6 ↗
37. Fatigue and static failure considerations using a topology optimization method10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.020 ↗
38. Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and simplified nominal stress constraints for fatigue resistance10.1007/s00158-016-1510-6 ↗
39. Topology optimization with finite-life fatigue constraints10.1007/s00158-017-1701-9 ↗
40. Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures considering fatigue failure10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107586 ↗
41. Fatigue-based topology optimization with non-proportional loads10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.015 ↗
42. A fatigue model for shape optimization10.1007/BF01197556 ↗
43. Robust optimization design for fatigue life10.1016/j.finel.2011.05.009 ↗
44. Multiobjective robust design optimization of fatigue life for a truck cab10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.007 ↗
45. Design optimisation of linear structures subjected to dynamic random loads with respect to fatigue life10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.001 ↗
46. Topology optimization and internal resonances in transverse vibrations of hyperelastic plates10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.11.029 ↗
47. Colliding Bodies Optimization method for optimum design of truss structures with continuous variables10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.01.002 ↗
48. Ball, J.A., Gohberg, I., and Rodman, L. (1990). Interpolation of Rational Matrix Functions, Springer Basel AG.10.1007/978-3-0348-7709-1 ↗
49. Active versus passive vibration absorbers10.1115/1.2899231 ↗
50. Yucesoy, V., and Ozbay, H. (2017, January 27–30). Design of robustly stabilizing low order, stable controllers for two-link underactuated planar robots. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA 2017), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/CCTA.2017.8062455 ↗
51. Haug, E.J., Choi, K.K., and Komkov, V. (1986). Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems, Academic Press.
52. Dirlik, T. (1985). Application of Computers in Fatigue Analysis. [PhD. Thesis, University of Warwick].
53. Real time high cycle fatigue estimation algorithm and load history monitoring for vehicles by the use of frequency domain methods10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.043 ↗
54. Hassan, R., Cohanim, B., Weck, O., and Venter, G.A. (2005, January 18–21). Comparison of Particle Swarm Optimization and the Genetic Algorithm. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Austin, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2005-1897 ↗
55. Chen, S. (2023, September 01). Constrained Particle Swarm Optimization (2009–2018). MATLAB File Exchange. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/25986.
56. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem10.1007/BF01650949 ↗
57. Petyt, M. (2010). Introduction to Finite Element Vibration Analysis, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].10.1017/CBO9780511761195 ↗
58. Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.10.013 ↗
59. Discussion on symmetry of optimum topology design10.1007/s00158-011-0686-z ↗