On the Local and String Stability Analysis of Traffic Collision Risk
Source abstract
Abstract
Conventional traffic stability studies primarily concentrate on the evolution of disturbances in vehicle motion but seldom consider how collision risk changes spatially and temporally. This study bridges the gap by extending the principles of traffic stability analysis to the field of traffic safety, focusing specifically on the temporal and spatial dynamics of collision risk. Leveraging the concepts of local and string stability, we formulate conditions under which collision risk behaves in a stable manner over time and space through the transfer function approach. A comparative analysis between conventional traffic stability and the newly introduced concept of collision risk stability reveals that while conditions for local stability are largely aligned in both domains, the criteria for string stability differ. These theoretical insights are substantiated through microscopic simulations using a variety of car-following models. The simulations also indicate that the consistency between theoretical and simulation outcomes diminishes as the disturbance magnitude increases, which is attributed to the linearization errors inherent in applying the transfer function in the theoretical derivations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Traffic and Road Safety · Transportation Planning and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore
School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
Funding
Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. WHO (2024, January 18). Road Traffic Injuries, World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries.
2. Driving risk assessment using near-crash database through data mining of tree-based model10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.007 ↗
3. Xu, X., Wong, S., Zhu, F., Pei, X., Huang, H., and Liu, Y. (2017). A Heckman selection model for the safety analysis of signalized intersections. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0181544 ↗
4. What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? An assessment of law enforcement views, ordinary drivers’ opinions, and road accident records10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.025 ↗
5. Predicting the Segment-Based Effects of Heterogeneous Traffic and Road Geometric Features on Fatal Accidents10.14716/ijtech.v13i1.4450 ↗
6. Adaptive optimal control of heterogeneous CACC system with uncertain dynamics10.1109/TCST.2018.2811376 ↗
7. Traffic accident analysis using machine learning paradigms
8. Analysis of the traffic injury severity on two-lane, two-way rural roads based on classification tree models10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.019 ↗
9. Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.008 ↗
10. Lateral collision risk assessment of parallel routes in ocean area based on space-based ADS-B10.1016/j.trc.2021.102970 ↗
11. Assessing inequality, irregularity, and severity regarding road traffic safety during COVID-1910.1038/s41598-021-91392-z ↗
12. Assessing traffic disturbance, efficiency, and safety of the mixed traffic flow of connected vehicles and traditional vehicles by considering human factors10.1016/j.trc.2020.102934 ↗
13. Stability of CACC-manual heterogeneous vehicular flow with partial CACC performance degrading
14. Yu, W., Hua, X., and Wang, W. (2022). Stability and capacity for heterogeneous traffic flow mixed with vehicles in multiple controls. Transp. B Transp. Dyn., 649–682.10.1080/21680566.2022.2113476 ↗
15. Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.015 ↗
16. A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connected and automated vehicles safety modeling10.1016/j.aap.2021.106157 ↗
17. Wu, C., Bayen, A.M., and Mehta, A. (2018, January 21–25). Stabilizing traffic with autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460567 ↗
18. Investigating the effect of emerging vehicle technologies on longitudinal traffic safety10.1061/JTEPBS.0000747 ↗
19. Li, Y., Chen, S., Du, R., Ha, P.Y.J., Dong, J., and Labi, S. (2020). Using empirical trajectory data to design connected autonomous vehicle controllers for traffic stabilization. arXiv.
20. Li, Y., Chen, S., Ha, P.Y.J., Dong, J., Steinfeld, A., and Labi, S. (2020). Leveraging vehicle connectivity and autonomy to stabilize flow in mixed traffic conditions: Accounting for human-driven vehicle driver behavioral heterogeneity and perception-reaction time delay. arXiv.
21. Traffic dynamics: Studies in car following10.1287/opre.6.2.165 ↗
22. Treiber, M., and Kesting, A. (2013). Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-32460-4 ↗
23. Model-based string stability of adaptive cruise control systems using field data10.1109/TIV.2019.2955368 ↗
24. Analytical studies on the instabilities of heterogeneous intelligent traffic flow10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.02.018 ↗
25. Effect of the car-following combinations on the instability of heterogeneous traffic flow
26. Analytical analysis of the effect of maximum platoon size of connected and automated vehicles10.1016/j.trc.2020.102882 ↗
27. Dong, T. (2022). Investigation of Traffic Safety and Stability through Simulation and Theoretical Modelling. [Ph.D. Thesis, Nanyang Technological University]. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165135.
28. Stability analysis methods and their applicability to car-following models in conventional and connected environments10.1016/j.trb.2018.01.013 ↗
29. From homogeneous to heterogeneous traffic flows: Lp String stability under uncertain model parameters10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.009 ↗
30. Feng, Z., Ma, X., Zhu, X., and Ma, Z. (2018, January 26–30). Analysis of Driver Brake Behavior Under Critical Cut-in Scenarios. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Suzhou, China.10.1109/IVS.2018.8500438 ↗
31. String stability for vehicular platoon control: Definitions and analysis methods10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.03.001 ↗
32. On string stability of a mixed and heterogeneous traffic flow: A unifying modelling framework10.1016/j.trb.2020.11.009 ↗
33. In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: A review of surrogate safety indicators10.1080/01441647.2018.1442888 ↗
34. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traffic conflict techniques10.1016/j.aap.2021.106016 ↗
35. Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.02.001 ↗
36. Derivation and validation of new simulation-based surrogate safety measure10.3141/2083-12 ↗
37. Scalable traffic stability analysis in mixed-autonomy using continuum models10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.007 ↗
38. Impacts of information flow topology on traffic dynamics of CAV-MV heterogeneous flow10.1109/TITS.2022.3170965 ↗
39. Car-following models: Fifty years of linear stability analysis—A mathematical perspective10.1080/03081060.2011.530826 ↗
40. Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5429 ↗
41. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805 ↗
42. Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity10.1098/rsta.2010.0084 ↗
43. Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001 ↗