journal article·2024-01-16Open access

Unsupervised Wavelet-Feature Correlation Ratio Markov Clustering Algorithm for Remotely Sensed Images

Zhaohui Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

The spectrums of one type of object under different conditions have the same features (up, down, protruding, concave) at the same spectral positions, which can be used as primary parameters to evaluate the difference among remotely sensed pixels. The wavelet-feature correlation ratio Markov clustering algorithm (WFCRMCA) for remotely sensed data is proposed based on an accurate description of abrupt spectral features and an optimized Markov clustering in the wavelet feather space. The peak points can be captured and identified by applying a wavelet transform to spectral data. The correlation ratio between two samples is a statistical calculation of the matched peak point positions on the wavelet feature within an adjustable spectrum domain or a range of wavelet scales. The evenly sampled data can be used to create class centers, depending on the correlation ratio threshold at each Markov step, accelerating the clustering speed by avoiding the computation of Euclidean distance for traditional clustering algorithms, such as K-means and ISODATA. Markov clustering applies several strategies, such as a simulated annealing method and gradually shrinking the clustering size, to control the clustering convergence. It can quickly obtain the best class centers at each clustering temperature. The experimental results of the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) and Thermal Mapping (TM) data have verified its acceptable clustering accuracy and high convergence velocity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing and Land Use · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Systems Technology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27410, USA

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang, Z. (2018, January 6–8). Residual Clustering Based Lossless Compression for Remotely Sensed Images. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT), Louisville, KY, USA.10.1109/ISSPIT.2018.8642699 ↗
2. Wang, Z. (2021, January 15–18). Entropy Analysis for Clustering Based Lossless Compression of Remotely Sensed Images. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671694 ↗
3. Theodoridis, S., and Koutroumba, K. (2008). Pattern Recognition, Academic Press. [4th ed.].
4. K-means Clustering Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review, Variants Analysis, and Advances in the Era of Big Data10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139 ↗
5. Isodata-Based Method for Clustering Surveys Responses with Mixed Data: The 2021 StackOverflow Developer Survey
6. Improved ISODATA Clustering Method with Parameter Estimation based on Genetic Algorithm
7. An Improved Hybrid Clustering Algorithm for Natural Scenes10.1109/36.841982 ↗
8. Bo, L., and Bretschneider, T. (2003, January 21–25). D-ISMC: A distributed unsupervised classification algorithm for optical satellite imagery. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toulouse, France.
9. A Generalized Orthogonal Subspace Projection Approach to Unsupervised Multi-spectral Image Classification10.1109/36.885199 ↗
10. Unsupervised Hyperspectral Image Analysis with Projection Pursuit10.1109/36.885200 ↗
11. Remote sensing image classification: No features, no clustering10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2495267 ↗
12. Bag-of-Visual-Words Scene Classifier for Remote Sensing Image Based on Region Covariance
13. Peng, B., Yao, Y., Lei, J., Fang, L., and Huang, Q. (2023). Graph-Based Structural Deep Spectral-Spatial Clustering for Hyperspectral Image. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., accepted.10.1109/TIM.2023.3271762 ↗
14. 3D residual spatial–spectral convolution network for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification10.1007/s00521-022-07933-8 ↗
15. Segmentation of remotely sensed images using wavelet features and their evaluation in soft computing framework10.1109/TGRS.2003.815398 ↗
16. Anupong, W., Jweeg, M.J., Alani, S., Al-Kharsan, I.H., Alviz-Meza, A., and Cárdenas-Escrocia, Y. (2023). Comparison of Wavelet Artificial Neural Network, Wavelet Support Vector Machine, and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Methods in Estimating Total Solar Radiation in Iraq. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16020985 ↗
17. Greedy clustering algorithm and its application for the classification and compression of remotely sensed images
18. Fast clustering based on spectral wavelet features extraction and simulated annealing algorithm for multi-spectral Images
19. Haddad, S.A.P., and Serdijn, W.A. (2009). Ultra Low-Power Biomedical Signal Processing: An Analog Wavelet Filter Approach for Pacemakers, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4020-9073-8 ↗
20. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation10.1109/34.192463 ↗
21. Joseph, A. (2020). Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods in Quantum Field Theories: A Modern Primer, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-46044-0 ↗
22. Bittelli, M., Olmi, R., and Rosa, R. (2022). Random Process Analysis with R, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198862512.001.0001 ↗
23. Li, Q., Zhao, J., and Zhao, Y.-N. (2009, January 1–2). Detection of Ventricular Fibrillation by Support Vector Machine Algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/CAR.2009.29 ↗
24. The Lifting Scheme: A Custom-design Construction of Biorthogonal Wavelet10.1006/acha.1996.0015 ↗
25. Knowledge Discovery from Multi-spectral Satellite Images10.1109/LGRS.2004.834593 ↗
26. Goodenough, D.G., Bhogal, A.S., Dyk, A., Niemann, O., Han, T., Chen, H., West, C., and Schmidt, C. (2001, January 9–13). Calibration of Forest Chemistry for Hyperspectral Analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
27. Processing Hyperion and ALI for Forest Classification10.1109/TGRS.2003.813214 ↗
28. Ridgelets: A key to higher-dimensional intermittency?10.1098/rsta.1999.0444 ↗
29. The curvelet transform for image denoising10.1109/TIP.2002.1014998 ↗