Enhancing Color Scales for Active Data Physicalizations
Source abstract
Abstract
Data Physicalization is the area that investigates how physical objects can encode data through their physical (geometry and materials) and visual features. In the information visualization field, color plays a fundamental role in communicating and encoding data, and it is no different for data physicalization. However, in the real world, color perception can be influenced by the material that composes the data physicalization, the environment’s brightness, and the characteristics of the light-emitting device. Thus, this article presents a process to evaluate and select colors to compose color palettes (categorical, sequential, and divergent) for data physicalizations, considering the perceptual distance between the chosen colors and the brightness of the light-emitting device for evaluating the influence of neighboring colors. Additionally, users perform Information Visualization tasks (identification, comparison, maximums, minimums, etc.) with different color palettes of the industry and literature in a physical 3D bar chart composed of LED strips. The initial results showed better performance by participants using the proposed color scales in Information Visualization tasks than those using traditional digital color scales. Finally, the steps carried out culminated in the proposition of a pipeline for evaluating and creating color scales for data physicalization, considering the features of the light-emitting device and the material used in the data physicalization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Interactive and Immersive Displays · Data Visualization and Analytics · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
PPGCC–ICEN, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil
IEETA–DETI, University of Aveiro (UA), 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Funding
Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (CAPES) · Federal University of Pará (UFPA) · PROPESP/UFPA (PAPQ) · IEETA · Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and National Advanced Computing Network (RNCA)
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Bae, S.S., Szafir, D.A., and Do, E.Y.L. (2023, November 11). Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Data Physicalization. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/.
2. Jansen, Y., Dragicevic, P., Isenberg, P., Alexander, J., Karnik, A., Kildal, J., Subramanian, S., and Hornbæk, K. (2015, January 18–23). Opportunities and challenges for data physicalization. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1145/2702123.2702180 ↗
3. From Data to Physical Artifact: Challenges and Opportunities in Designing Physical Data Artifacts for Everyday Life10.1145/3511670 ↗
4. Dumičić, Ž., Thoring, K., Klöckner, H.W., and Joost, G. (July, January 25). Design Elements in Data Physicalization: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the DRS2022, Bilbao, Spain.10.21606/drs.2022.660 ↗
5. Multisensory Immersive Analytics10.1007/978-3-030-01388-2_3 ↗
6. Ranasinghe, C., and Degbelo, A. (2023). Encoding Variables, Evaluation Criteria and Evaluation Methods for Data Physicalizations: A Review. arXiv.10.3390/mti7070073 ↗
7. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics, University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Physecology: A Conceptual Framework to Describe Data Physicalizations in their Real-World Context
9. Hogan, T. (2018, January 25–28). Data Sensification: Beyond representation modality, toward encoding data in experience. Proceedings of the DRS International Conference, Limerick, Ireland.10.21606/drs.2018.238 ↗
10. Dragicevic, P., Jansen, Y., and Vande Moere, A. (2020). Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, Springer.
11. Fisher, D., and Meyer, M. (2017). Making Data Visual: A Practical Guide to Using Visualization for Insight, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
12. Strategic value of big data and business analytics10.1080/07421222.2018.1451950 ↗
13. Card, S.K., Mackinlay, J., and Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think, Morgan Kaufmann.
14. An interaction model for visualizations beyond the desktop10.1109/TVCG.2013.134 ↗
15. Dynamic composite data physicalization using wheeled micro-robots
16. Taher, F., Hardy, J., Karnik, A., Weichel, C., Jansen, Y., Hornbæk, K., and Alexander, J. (2015, January 18–23). Exploring interactions with physically dynamic bar charts. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Acm Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1145/2702123.2702604 ↗
17. Embedded data representations10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598608 ↗
18. Surfacing small worlds through data-in-place10.1007/s10606-017-9263-3 ↗
19. Data to physicalization: A survey of the physical rendering process10.1111/cgf.14330 ↗
20. Ware, C. (2019). Information Visualization: Perception for Design, Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Jansen, Y. (2014). Physical and Tangible Information Visualization. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris Sud-Paris XI].
22. Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces10.1147/sj.393.0915 ↗
23. Corporation, M. (1994). Precise Color Communication: Color Control from Feeling to Instrumentation, Minolta.
24. Birch, J., and Birch, J. (2023, November 11). Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision. Available online: aojournal.com.au.
25. Moreland, K. (December, January 30). Diverging color maps for scientific visualization (expanded). Proceedings of the ISVC, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
26. A new computer-based Farnsworth Munsell 100-hue test for evaluation of color vision10.1007/s10792-013-9865-9 ↗
27. CIE (2001). Improvement to Industrial Colour-Difference Evaluation, CIE. Technical Report.
28. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000
29. Color difference Delta E—A survey
30. Farnsworth, D. (1957). The Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue Test for the Examination of Color Discrimination, Munsell Color Company.
31. Use of the Farnsworth—Munsell 100-Hue test in the examination of congenital colour vision defects10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00836.x ↗
32. Color vision tests for early detection of antiepileptic drug toxicity10.1212/WNL.48.5.1394 ↗
33. On the validity of virtual reality applications for professional use: A case study on color vision research and diagnosis10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3118438 ↗
34. Sturdee, M., Kara, H., and Alexander, J. (2023, January 23–28). Exploring Co-Located Interactions with a Shape-Changing Bar Chart. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3544548.3581214 ↗
35. Engert, S., Klamka, K., Peetz, A., and Dachselt, R. (May, January 29). STRAIDE: A Research Platform for Shape-Changing Spatial Displays Based on Actuated Strings. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3491102.3517462 ↗
36. Hinze, A., Vanderschantz, N., Sijnja, N., Rogers, B., and Cunningham, S.J. (2022, January 13–16). Physical Metadata Visualisation: The Knitted Personal Library. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3490149.3505582 ↗
37. Panagiotidou, G., Görücü, S., Nofal, E., Akkar Ercan, M., and Vande Moere, A. (2022, January 19–23). Co-Gnito: A Participatory Physicalization Game for Urban Mental Mapping. Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3527927.3532803 ↗
38. Live Feedback for Training through Real-Time Data Visualizations: A Study with League of Legends10.1145/3549506 ↗
39. Sauvé, K., Ramirez Gomez, A., and Houben, S. (May, January 29). Put a Label on It! Approaches for Constructing and Contextualizing Bar Chart Physicalizations. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3491102.3501952 ↗
40. Soares de Sousa, T.A., Monteiro, W.C., Oliveira de Araújo, T.D., Resque dos Santos, C.G., and Meiguins, B.S. (2022, January 19–22). An Overview of the Design and Development for Dynamic and Physical Bar Charts. Proceedings of the 2022 26th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/IV56949.2022.00020 ↗
41. Bae, S., Yang, R., Gyory, P., Uhr, J., Szafir, D.A., and Do, E.Y.L. (2021, January 24–30). Touching Information with DIY Paper Charts & AR Markers. Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3459990.3465191 ↗
42. Daniel, M., and Rivière, G. (2021, January 14–19). Exploring Axisymmetric Shape-Change’s Purposes and Allure for Ambient Display: 16 Potential Use Cases and a Two-Month Preliminary Study on Daily Notifications. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3430524.3442452 ↗
43. Multi-Touch Querying on Data Physicalizations in Immersive AR10.1145/3488542 ↗
44. Menheere, D., van Hartingsveldt, E., Birkebæk, M., Vos, S., and Lallemand, C. (July, January 28). Laina: Dynamic Data Physicalization for Slow Exercising Feedback. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3461778.3462041 ↗
45. Morais, L., Sampaio, L., Yásser, G., and Brito, A. (July, January 28). Lumiphys: Designing a Long-Term Energy Physicalization to Democratize Smart Campus Data. Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, New York, NY, USA.
46. Ren, H., and Hornecker, E. (2021, January 14–19). Comparing Understanding and Memorization in Physicalization and VR Visualization. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3430524.3442446 ↗
47. Sauvé, K., Verweij, D., Alexander, J., and Houben, S. (2021, January 8–13). Reconfiguration Strategies with Composite Data Physicalizations. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan.10.1145/3411764.3445746 ↗
48. Pepping, J., Scholte, S., van Wijland, M., de Meij, M., Wallner, G., and Bernhaupt, R. (2020, January 25–29). Motiis: Fostering Parents’ Awareness of Their Adolescents Emotional Experiences during Gaming. Proceedings of the NordiCHI ’20: Twelve Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, Tallinn, Estonia.10.1145/3419249.3420173 ↗
49. Sauvé, K., Bakker, S., and Houben, S. (2020, January 6–10). Econundrum: Visualizing the Climate Impact of Dietary Choice through a Shared Data Sculpture. Proceedings of the DIS ’20: Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1145/3357236.3395509 ↗
50. Veldhuis, A., Liang, R.H., and Bekker, T. (2020, January 9–12). CoDa: Collaborative Data Interpretation through an Interactive Tangible Scatterplot. Proceedings of the TEI ’20: Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1145/3374920.3374934 ↗
51. Daniel, M., Rivière, G., and Couture, N. (2019, January 17–20). CairnFORM: A Shape-Changing Ring Chart Notifying Renewable Energy Availability in Peripheral Locations. Proceedings of the TEI ’19: Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Tempe, AZ, USA.10.1145/3294109.3295634 ↗
52. Wun, T., Oehlberg, L., Sturdee, M., and Carpendale, S. (2019, January 17–20). You Say Potato, I Say Po-Data: Physical Template Tools for Authoring Visualizations. Proceedings of the TEI ’19: Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Tempe, AZ, USA.10.1145/3294109.3295627 ↗
53. Physicalizations of Big Data in Ethnographic Context
54. Khot, R.A., Aggarwal, D., Pennings, R., Hjorth, L., and Mueller, F.F. (2017, January 6–11). EdiPulse: Investigating a Playful Approach to Self-Monitoring through 3D Printed Chocolate Treats. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA.
55. Khot, R.A., Andres, J., Lai, J., von Kaenel, J., and Mueller, F.F. (2016, January 4–8). Fantibles: Capturing Cricket Fan’s Story in 3D. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
56. Stusak, S., Hobe, M., and Butz, A. (2016, January 14–17). If Your Mind Can Grasp It, Your Hands Will Help. Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1145/2839462.2839476 ↗
57. Comparing Bar Chart Authoring with Microsoft Excel and Tangible Tiles10.1111/cgf.12887 ↗
58. Szigeti, S.J., Stevens, A., Tu, R., Jofre, A., Gebhardt, A., Chevalier, F., Lee, J., and Diamond, S.L. (May, January 26). Output to Input: Concepts for Physical Data Representations and Tactile User Interfaces. Proceedings of the CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada.
59. (2023, November 11). Fusion 360|3D CAD, CAM, CAE, & PCB Cloud-Based Software| Autodesk. Available online: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/overview.
60. (2023, November 11). Ender-3 V2 3D Printer. Available online: https://www.creality.com/products/ender-3-v2-3d-printer-csco.
61. Malik-Moraleda, S., Mahowald, K., Conway, B.R., and Gibson, E. (2023). Concepts Are Restructured During Language Contact: The Birth of Blue and Other Color Concepts in Tsimane’-Spanish Bilinguals. Psychol. Sci., 40.10.1177/09567976231199742 ↗
62. Eysenck, M.W., and Keane, M.T. (2005). Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook, Psychology Press. [5th ed.].
63. Lightness constancy in surface visualization10.1109/TVCG.2015.2500240 ↗
64. Healey, C.G. (1996). Effective Visualization of Large Multidimensional Datasets. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia].
65. ColorBrewer.org: An online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps10.1179/000870403235002042 ↗