Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Retrofitted with a New Concrete Filled Tube Composite Strengthening System
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a concrete-filled tube composite strengthening system (CCSS), which is a new concept that can improve and supplement the vulnerability of existing CFT seismic strengthening methods. The CCSS seismic reinforcement method is easy to construct and integrates with the existing frame and reinforcement. It is one of the seismic strengthening methods that allows the simple calculation of the required amount of seismic reinforcement and can efficiently increase the strength when applied to existing reinforced concrete (R/C) buildings with non-seismic details dominated by shear failure. To examine the seismic safety of the proposed CCSS, two framework specimens were prepared based on an existing R/C building with non-seismic details. A pseudo-dynamic test was conducted on the unreinforced framework specimen and the framework specimen reinforced with CCSS to verify the seismic strengthening effect of applying CCSS to the existing R/C framework, i.e., in terms of the load–displacement characteristics and seismic response control capability. Based on the pseudo-dynamic test results, restoration of the force characteristics was proposed for the nonlinear dynamic analysis of the building reinforced with CCSS. Nonlinear dynamic analysis was conducted based on the proposed restoration of the force characteristics, and the results were compared with the pseudo-dynamic test results. Finally, for the commercialization of CCSS, nonlinear dynamic analysis was conducted on the existing whole R/C building with non-seismic details that was reinforced with CCSS. The seismic strengthening effect was then verified by examining the seismic response load, displacement characteristics, and the degree of seismic damage to the members based on the ductility ratio before and after seismic strengthening. The study results show that under a design basis earthquake with a magnitude of 200 cm/s2, the unreinforced R/C building exhibits shear failure, and light seismic damage is expected on the CCSS-reinforced building.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
Department of Architectural & Smart City Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) · Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT, Korea government)
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Architectural Institute of Korea (AIK) (2018). Site Inspection and Damage Investigation of Buildings by Earthquakes in Gyoungju and Pohang, Architectural Institute of Korea.
2. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 356 (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
3. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA) (2017). Guideline for Seismic Strengthening of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings, JBDPA.
4. Seismic Strengthening Research Group (SSRG) (2008). Seismic Strengthening of RC Buildings, Ohmsha Press.
5. Out-of-plane response of ECC-strengthened masonry walls
6. Multi-performance retrofits to commercial buildings in seismic zones
7. Single diagonal precast prestressed concrete bracing for strengthening existing concrete frames10.1007/s40091-018-0201-5 ↗
8. Experimental Study on Seismic Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Composite Columns Based on a High-ductile Fiber Cementitious Composite
9. Nonlinear dynamic response of R/C buildings strengthened with novel stud-typed seismic control system using non-buckling slit damper10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112749 ↗
10. Seismic Strengthening Effects Based on Pseudodynamic Testing of a Reinforced Concrete Building Retrofitted with a Wire-Woven Bulk Kagome Truss Damper10.1155/2016/3956126 ↗
11. Seismic Safety Evaluation of Korean R/C School Buildings Built in the 1980s
12. A Seismic Capacity of R/C Building Damaged by the 2016 Gyeongju Earthquake Based on the Non-linear Dynamic Analysis
13. (2017). Test Pieces for Tension Test for Metallic Materials (Standard No. KS B 0801).
14. Ministry of Eduaction (MOE) and Korea Institute of Educational Environment (KIEE) (2011). Guideline for Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Existing School Buildings in Korea, MOE and KIEE.
15. (2019). Korean Design Standard 41, Architectural Institute of Korea.
16. Seismic Capacity Requirements for Low-Rise R/C Buildings Controlled by Both Shear and Flexure10.3151/jact.8.75 ↗
17. Umemura, H. (1973). Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Accounting for the Dynamic Effects of Earthquakes, Giho-do Publishing Co.
18. Takanashi, K., Udagawa, K., and Tanaka, H. (1980, January 8–13). Pseudo-dynamic tests on a 2-storey steel frame by a computer-load test apparatus hybrid system. Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
19. (2023, March 29). Tokyo Soki Kenkyujo Company (TSKC): DA-16A. 2023. Tokyo, Japan. Available online: https://www.tml.jp/e/.
20. MTS (2002). Pseudodynamic Testing for 793 Controllers, MTS Systems Corporation.
21. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics10.1002/eqe.4290050306 ↗
22. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA) (2015). Standard for Damage Level Classification, JBDPA.
23. Maeda, M., Nakano, Y., and Lee, K.S. (2004, January 1–6). Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation for R/C Buildings Based on Residual Seismic Capacity. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
24. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA) (2017). Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings, JBDPA.
25. AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan) (2010). Standard for Structural Calculation of Reinforced Concrete Structures, AIJ. (In Japanese).
26. Li, K.N. (2009). Canny (Version C11): A 3-dimensional Nonlinear Dynamic Structural Analysis Computer Program, User Manual, CANNY Structural Analysis.
27. Nakano, Y. (1986, January 2–9). Seismic Capacity of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Proceedings of the 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan.
28. Development and present status of seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Japan10.2183/pjab.97.021 ↗
29. A methodology for evaluating seismic capacity and seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Korea10.1080/13467581.2020.1717960 ↗