Assessing Change of Direction Ability in Young Male Athletes: A Comparative Analysis of Change of Direction Deficit and Change of Direction Total Time

This study aimed to explore the relationship between change of direction deficit (CODD), change of direction total time (CODTT), and linear sprint time and to compare the differences between CODD and CODTT in assessing an athlete’s change of direction (COD) ability. Forty-four highly trained male young athletes underwent Y-shaped pre-planned agility, Pro-agility, and 30 m linear sprint tests. The results showed a moderate to highly significant correlation between CODTT and linear speed time at 0–5 m, 0–10 m, and 0–30 m (r = 0.5–0.8), while there was no statistically significant relationship between CODD and linear speed time at 0–5 m and 0–10 m (r = 0.0–0.3). CODD and CODTT were moderate to highly correlated (r = 0.4–0.8), with CODD for 180° COD showing a higher predictive value for CODTT compared to 45° COD (14–35% vs. 49–63%). Additionally, 13–22% of the participants showed opposing results for COD ability when comparing the standardized Z-score of Pro-agility 0–10 m CODTT and CODD. Pro-agility 0–10 m CODD also resulted in a higher asymmetry ratio (2% vs. 7%) and COD ability imbalances (0% vs. 38%) than Pro-agility 0–10 m CODTT. In conclusion, CODD may provide a more accurate assessment of an athlete’s COD ability than CODTT.