Investigation of the Gas Pressure Field and Production Rate for Two Typical Proppants: Small-Sized Continuous and Large-Sized Discontinuous Proppants
Source abstract
Abstract
The small-sized proppant is widely used in the traditional hydraulic fracturing reservoir stimulation, but the theoretical research shows that the large-sized proppant can greatly improve the fracture permeability. Although many scholars have proposed the method of using large-sized proppant, the characteristics of the pressure field change and gas drainage rate during reservoir development are still unclear after pumping large-sized proppant. In this article, to study the change regularity of the reservoir pressure field, two representative proppants are selected: the small-sized proppant and large-sized proppants. First, the Navier–Stokes equations are solved using the numerical simulation method, and the characteristics of the reservoir pressure field are finely reproduced. Then, the production rate is discussed to reveal the huge potential of large-sized proppant for the natural gas development. The results show that under the same conditions, if the particle size of the proppant increases by 5 times, then the reservoir permeability will increase by 27 times approximately, and the single well production efficiency will increase by 17~19 times in the first 3000 days. In addition, a new quantitative model is proposed to evaluate the permeability magnification of the fracture and reservoir when adopting the large-sized proppant. This study further confirms that the method of large-sized proppant proposed by the author in the earlier stage has great potential. This study is helpful for the researchers and engineers to better understand the evolution regularity of the reservoir pressure field and gas production rate in the process of oil and gas exploitation after using the large-sized proppant.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Oil and Gas Production Techniques · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent Developments in Natural Gas Flaring Reduction and Reformation to Energy-Efficient Fuels: A Review10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04269 ↗
2. Low-permeability reservoir sample wettability characterization at multiple scales: Pore-, micro- and macro-contact angles10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104229 ↗
3. Overview and Outlook on Utilization Technologies of Low-Concentration Coal Mine Methane10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02312 ↗
4. Research on main controlling factors and its influencing laws on hydraulic fracture network in the fractured soft and low-permeability coal10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104147 ↗
5. Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing10.1016/B978-0-12-822195-2.00020-6 ↗
6. Review of hydraulic fracturing for preconditioning in cave mining10.1007/s00603-016-1075-0 ↗
7. Stress-Dependent Unstable Dynamic Propagation of Three-Dimensional Multiple Hydraulic Fractures with Improved Fracturing Sequences in Heterogeneous Reservoirs: Numerical Cases Study via Poroelastic Effective Medium Model10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03132 ↗
8. A review of hydraulic fracturing simulation10.1007/s11831-021-09653-z ↗
9. Analysis of hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation in deep shale formation with high horizontal stress difference10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.060 ↗
10. Experimental of hydraulic fracture propagation using fixed-point multistage fracturing in a vertical well in tight sandstone reservoir10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.080 ↗
11. Zhang, Z.X., Wang, H.T., Deng, B.Z., Li, M.H., and Zhang, D.M. (2018). Field investigation of hydraulic fracturing in coal seams and its enhancement for methane extraction in the southeast Sichuan Basin, China. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11123451 ↗
12. Fracture initiation and morphology of tight sandstone by liquid nitrogen fracturing10.1007/s00603-021-02755-x ↗
13. A new permeability model of fracture containing proppants10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104661 ↗
14. Stimulation techniques of coalbed methane reservoirs
15. Complex fracture closure pressure analysis during shut-in: A numerical study10.1177/01445987221077311 ↗
16. Proppant placement in complex fracture geometries: A computational fluid dynamics study10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103295 ↗
17. Recent progress on proppant laboratory testing method: Characterisation, conductivity, transportation, and erosivity10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108871 ↗
18. Lattice-Boltzmann simulation of fluid flow through packed beds of uniform spheres: Effect of porosity10.1016/j.ces.2013.05.036 ↗
19. Performance evaluation of SDAGM-coated microproppants in hydraulic fracturing using the lattice Boltzmann method10.1002/cjce.24204 ↗
20. Fluid mechanics of hydraulic fracturing: A review10.1016/j.petrol.2017.05.019 ↗
21. A general model for the permeability of fibrous porous media based on fluid flow simulations using the lattice Boltzmann method10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.009 ↗
22. Simulation of a fluid flow and investigation of a permeability-porosity relationship in porous media with random circular obstacles using the curved boundary lattice Boltzmann method10.1140/epjp/i2018-12325-2 ↗
23. A comprehensive review on proppant technologies10.1016/j.petlm.2015.11.001 ↗
24. Evaluation of Coated Proppant Unconventional Performance10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00187 ↗
25. Gillard, M.R., Medvedev, O.O., Hosein, P.R., Medvedev, A., Peacorada, F., and d’Huteau, E. (2010, January 20–22). A new approach to generating fracture conductivity. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy.10.2118/135034-MS ↗
26. Experimental and theoretical study of fracture conductivity with heterogeneous proppant placement10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.059 ↗
27. Medvedev, A.V., Kraemer, C.C., Pena, A.A., and Panga, M.K.R. (2013, January 4–6). On the mechanisms of channel fracturing. Proceedings of the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/163836-MS ↗
28. White, F.M. (2012). Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw Hill.
29. Tao, W.Q. (2001). Numerical Heat Transfer, Xi’an Jiaotong University Press. [2nd ed.]. (In Chinese).
30. Simulation of gas desorption and geomechanics effects for unconventional gas reservoirs10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.032 ↗
31. A fully coupled multiscale shale deformation-gas transport model for the evaluation of shale gas extraction10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.055 ↗
32. A practical method for production data analysis from multistage fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs10.1016/j.fuel.2016.09.029 ↗
33. Guo, X. (2016). Flow Mechanism of Shale Gas and Simulation, Science Press.
34. Fluid flow through granular beds
35. Permeability of unidirectional reinforcements for RTM10.1177/002199839202600802 ↗
36. Geometrical and transport properties of random packings of spheres and aspherical particles10.1103/PhysRevE.55.1959 ↗
37. Permeability of three-dimensional random fiber webs10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.716 ↗
38. Hydraulic permeability of (un)bounded fibrous media using the lattice Boltzmann method10.1103/PhysRevE.61.616 ↗