Examining Gait Characteristics in People with Osteoporosis Utilizing a Non-Wheeled Smart Walker through Spatiotemporal Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Fragility fractures, caused by low-energy trauma, are a significant global health concern, with 158 million people aged 50 and over at risk. Hip fractures, a common issue in elderly patients, are often linked to underlying conditions such as osteoporosis. This study proposed a cost-effective solution using a non-wheeled smart walker with load sensors to measure gait parameters, addressing the high cost of traditional gait analysis equipment, the prototype used PASCO load cells PS2200 for force measurement, eliminating the need for Arduino UNO or microcontroller-based hardware. A lightweight amplifier PS2198 amplified the signal, which was transmitted via USB to a personal computer. PASCO capstone software was used for data recording and visualization. The smart walker was tested on forty volunteers divided into two equal groups: those with osteoporosis and those without, by performing a 10 m walk test three times. ANOVA comparing spatiotemporal parameters (TSPs) of the two participant groups (α = 0.05) showed that significant differences lay in terms of time taken to complete the walk test (p < 0.01), left step length (p = 0.03), walking speed (p = 0.02), and stride length (p < 0.02). The results indicate that this smart walker is a reliable tool for assessing gait patterns in individuals with osteoporosis. The proposed system can be an alternative for time consuming and costly methods such as motion capture, and for socially stigmatizing devices such as exoskeletons. It can also be used further to identify risk factors of osteoporosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Ziauddin University, Karachi 74600, Pakistan
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Balochistan University of Engineering & Technology, Khuzdar 89100, Pakistan
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ziauddin University, Karachi 74600, Pakistan
Department of Mechatronics and Machine Dynamics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Osteoporosis and gait and balance disturbances in older sarcopenic obese New Zealanders10.1007/s00198-009-0947-5 ↗
2. Weinhandl, J.T., Irmischer, B.S., and Sievert, Z.A.J.A.B. (2017). Effects of gait speed of femoroacetabular joint forces. Appl. Bionics Biomech., 2017.10.1155/2017/6432969 ↗
3. Gait characteristics in older women with osteoporosis and fear of falling10.3109/21679169.2013.827238 ↗
4. Influence of a physical training program on muscle strength, balance and gait velocity among women with osteoporosis10.1590/S1413-35552006000400013 ↗
5. Observational gait assessment tools in paediatrics—A systematic review10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.187 ↗
6. Marin, J., Marin, J.J., Blanco, T., de la Torre, J., Salcedo, I., and Martitegui, E.J.A.S. (2020). Is my patient improving? Individualized gait analysis in rehabilitation. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238558 ↗
7. Chan, S.C., Chan, Y.T.n., and Chong, Y.Z. (2021, January 28). A low-cost human gait analysis system. Proceedings of the Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1007/978-3-030-90724-2_21 ↗
8. Zhang, P., and Zhang, Y. (2021, January 12–15). Video methods for gait analysis in daily environment. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Signal Processing Systems (ICSPS 2021), Shanghai, China.10.1117/12.2631593 ↗
9. Felius, R.A., Geerars, M., Bruijn, S.M., van Dieën, J.H., Wouda, N.C., and Punt, M.J.S. (2022). Reliability of IMU-based gait assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030908 ↗
10. Assessment methods of post-stroke gait: A scoping review of technology-driven approaches to gait characterization and analysis10.3389/fneur.2021.650024 ↗
11. FeetMe® Monitor-connected insoles are a valid and reliable alternative for the evaluation of gait speed after stroke10.1080/10749357.2020.1792717 ↗
12. Park, S.J., Hussain, I., Hong, S., Kim, D., Park, H., and Benjamin, H.C.M. (2020, January 4–6). Real-time gait monitoring system for consumer stroke prediction service. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/ICCE46568.2020.9043098 ↗
13. An pproach to Gait Analysis from Human-Rollator Interaction: The i-Walker
14. Ballesteros, J., Urdiales, C., Martinez, A.B., and Tirado, M. (October, January 28). Gait analysis for challenged users based on a rollator equipped with force sensors. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany.
15. Automatic Assessment of a Rollator-User’s Condition During Rehabilitation Using the i-Walker Platform10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2698005 ↗
16. Ballesteros, J., Tudela, A., Caro-Romero, J.R., and Urdiales, C. (2019). Weight-Bearing Estimation for Cane Users by Using Onboard Sensors. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19030509 ↗
17. Caro-Romero, J.R., Ballesteros, J., Garcia-Lagos, F., Urdiales, C., and Sandoval, F. (2019, January 12–14). A Neural Network for Stance Phase detection in smart cane users. Proceedings of the Advances in Computational Intelligence: 15th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, IWANN 2019, Gran Canaria, Spain.10.1007/978-3-030-20521-8_26 ↗
18. Ballesteros, J., Urdiales, C., Martinez, A.B., and Van Dieën, J.H.J.S. (2016). On gait analysis estimation errors using force sensors on a smart rollator. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16111896 ↗
19. Papageorgiou, X.S., Chalvatzaki, G., Tzafestas, C.S., and Maragos, P. (June, January 31). Hidden Markov modeling of human normal gait using laser range finder for a mobility assistance robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China.
20. Fujimoto, A., Matsumoto, N., Jiang, Y., Togo, S., Teshigawara, S., and Yokoi, H. (2018, January 24–27). Gait analysis based speed control of walking assistive robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Safety for Robotics (ISR), Shenyang, China.10.1109/IISR.2018.8535980 ↗
21. A multi-camera and multimodal dataset for posture and gait analysis10.1038/s41597-022-01722-7 ↗
22. Intelligent Gait Analysis and Evaluation System Based on Cane Robot10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3213823 ↗
23. Page, S., Martins, M.M., Saint-Bauzel, L., Santos, C.P., and Pasqui, V. (2015, January 26–30). Fast embedded feet pose estimation based on a depth camera for smart walker. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139781 ↗
24. Postolache, O., Pereira, J.D., Viegas, V., and Girão, P.S. (2015, January 7–9). Gait rehabilitation assessment based on microwave Doppler radars embedded in walkers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings, Turin, Italy.10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145200 ↗
25. Ojeda, M., Cortés, A., Béjar, J., and Cortés, U. (2018, January 26–29). Automatic classification of gait patterns using a smart rollator and the BOSS model. Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference, Corfu, Greece.10.1145/3197768.3201575 ↗
26. Assessing the concurrent validity of a gait analysis system integrated into a smart walker in older adults with gait impairments10.1177/0269215519852143 ↗
27. Fernandez-Carmona, M., Ballesteros, J., Díaz-Boladeras, M., Parra-Llanas, X., Urdiales, C., and Gómez-De-Gabriel, J.M. (2022). Walk-IT: An Open-Source Modular Low-Cost Smart Rollator. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22062086 ↗
28. Viegas, V., Pereira, J.M.D., Postolache, O., and Girão, P.S. (2018). Monitoring Walker Assistive Devices: A Novel Approach Based on Load Cells and Optical Distance Measurements. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18020540 ↗
29. Summary measures for clinical gait analysis: A literature review10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.001 ↗
30. Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00190-X ↗
31. Design and control of JAIST active robotic walker10.1007/s11370-010-0064-5 ↗
32. Morone, G., Annicchiarico, R., Iosa, M., Federici, A., Paolucci, S., Cortés, U., and Caltagirone, C. (2016). Overground walking training with the i-Walker, a robotic servo-assistive device, enhances balance in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. J. Neuroeng.Rehabil., 13.10.1186/s12984-016-0155-4 ↗
33. Andreetto, M., Divan, S., Fontanelli, D., and Palopoli, L. (2016, January 9–14). Passive robotic walker path following with bang-bang hybrid control paradigm. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.10.1109/IROS.2016.7759179 ↗
34. Artificial-Intelligence-Powered Lower Limb Assistive Devices: Future of Home Care Technologies10.1002/aisy.202200361 ↗
35. Fear of falling serves as protection and signifies potential danger: A qualitative study to conceptualise the phrase “fear of falling” in women with osteoporosis10.1007/s00198-021-06047-6 ↗
36. Walking Characteristics and Bone Mineral Density in Community-dwelling Elderly Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
37. Lopes, S., Filipe, L., Silva, R., Cruz, A., Parreira, P., Couto, F., Bernardes, R., Apóstolo, J., Roseiro, L., and Malça, C. (2019). An Innovative Concept for a Walker with a Self-Locking Mechanism Using a Single Mechanical Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal., 16.10.3390/ijerph16101671 ↗
38. Why is walker-assisted gait metabolically expensive?10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.011 ↗
39. Mann, W.C. (2005). Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence: The State of the Science, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471743941 ↗
40. Puth, M.-T., Klaschik, M., Schmid, M., Weckbecker, K., and Münster, E. (2018). Prevalence and comorbidity of osteoporosis—A cross-sectional analysis on 10,660 adults aged 50 years and older in Germany. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 19.10.1186/s12891-018-2060-4 ↗