journal article·2023-10-31Open access

Datacentric Similarity Matching of Emergent Stigmergic Clustering to Fractional Factorial Vectoring: A Case for Leaner-and-Greener Wastewater Recycling

George Besseris

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 21

Abstract

Water scarcity is a challenging global risk. Urban wastewater treatment technologies, which utilize processes based on single-stage ultrafiltration (UF) or nanofiltration (NF), have the potential to offer lean-and-green cost-effective solutions. Robustifying the effectiveness of water treatment is a complex multidimensional characteristic problem. In this study, a non-linear Taguchi-type orthogonal-array (OA) sampler is enriched with an emergent stigmergic clustering procedure to conduct the screening/optimization of multiple UF/NF aquametric performance metrics. The stochastic solver employs the Databionic swarm intelligence routine to classify the resulting multi-response dataset. Next, a cluster separation measure, the Davies–Bouldin index, is used to evaluate input and output relationships. The self-organized bionic-classifier data-partition appropriateness is matched for signatures between the emergent stigmergic clustering memberships and the OA factorial vector sequences. To illustrate the proposed methodology, recently-published multi-response multifactorial L9(34) OA-planned experiments from two interesting UF-/NF-membrane processes are examined. In the study, seven UF-membrane process characteristics and six NF-membrane process characteristics are tested (1) in relationship to four controlling factors and (2) to synchronously evaluate individual factorial curvatures. The results are compared with other ordinary clustering methods and their performances are discussed. The unsupervised robust bionic prediction reveals that the permeate flux influences both the UF-/NF-membrane process performances. For the UF process and a three-cluster model, the Davies–Bouldin index was minimized at values of 1.89 and 1.27 for the centroid and medoid centrotypes, respectively. For the NF process and a two-cluster model, the Davies–Bouldin index was minimized for both centrotypes at values close to 0.4, which was fairly close to the self-validation value. The advantage of this proposed data-centric engineering scheme relies on its emergent and self-organized clustering capability, which retraces its appropriateness to the fractional factorial rigid structure and, hence, it may become useful for screening and optimizing small-data wastewater operating conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring Technologies · Membrane Separation Technologies · Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of West Attica, 12241 Egaleo, Greece

References (96)

Show source-provided references
1. United Nations (2023, September 21). Sustainable Development Goals, Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation. Available online: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/clean-water-and-sanitation.
2. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity10.1126/sciadv.1500323 ↗
3. The world’s road to water scarcity: Shortage and stress in the 20th century and pathways towards sustainability10.1038/srep38495 ↗
4. Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future10.1002/2016EF000518 ↗
5. (2014). Environmental Management-Water Footprint-Principles, Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14046).
6. The water footprint of humanity10.1073/pnas.1109936109 ↗
7. Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056 ↗
8. A simple approach to assess water scarcity integrating water quantity and quality10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.012 ↗
9. Assessing water scarcity by simultaneously considering environmental flow requirements, water quantity, and water quality10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.019 ↗
10. Identification of methodological challenges remaining in the assessment of a water scarcity footprint: A review10.1007/s11367-017-1304-0 ↗
11. Review and classification of indicators of green water availability and scarcity
12. A nexus modeling framework for assessing water scarcity solutions10.1016/j.cosust.2019.09.009 ↗
13. Water-food-energy-ecosystem nexus model development: Resource scarcity and regional development10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100207 ↗
14. Shemer, H., Wald, S., and Semiat, R. (2023). Challenges and Solutions for Global Water Scarcity. Membranes, 13.10.3390/membranes13060612 ↗
15. Wu, C., Liu, W., and Deng, H. (2023). Urbanization and the Emerging Water Crisis: Identifying Water Scarcity and Environmental Risk with Multiple Applications in Urban Agglomerations in Western China. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151712977 ↗
16. Advancing water footprint assessments: Combining the impacts of water pollution and scarcity10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161910 ↗
17. Uncovering the risk spillover of agricultural water scarcity by simultaneously considering water quality and quantity10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118209 ↗
18. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011 ↗
19. Water scarcity and future challenges for food production10.3390/w7030975 ↗
20. Representing water scarcity in future agricultural assessments10.1016/j.ancene.2017.05.002 ↗
21. Water scarcity in agriculture: An overview of causes, impacts and approaches for reducing the risks10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18507 ↗
22. Morante-Carballo, F., Montalván-Burbano, N., Quiñonez-Barzola, X., Jaya-Montalvo, M., and Carrión-Mero, P. (2022). What do We Know about Water Scarcity in Semi-Arid Zones? A Global Analysis and Research Trends. Water, 14.10.3390/w14172685 ↗
23. Ungureanu, N., Vladut, V., and Voicu, G. (2020). Water scarcity and wastewater reuse in crop irrigation. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12219055 ↗
24. Jaramillo, M.F., and Restrepo, I. (2017). Wastewater reuse in agriculture: A review about its limitations and benefits. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9101734 ↗
25. Lopez-Serrano, M.J., Velasco-Munoz, J.F., Arnar-Sanchez, J.A., and Roman-Sanchez, I.M. (2020). Sustainable use of wastewater in agriculture: A bibliometric analysis of worldwide research. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12218948 ↗
26. Assessment of potential risks associated with chemicals in wastewater used for irrigation in arid and semiarid zones: A review10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.027 ↗
27. Nutrient recovery from wastewater and reuse in agriculture: A review10.1007/s10311-020-01159-7 ↗
28. Desalination and water reuse to address global water scarcity10.1007/s11157-017-9449-7 ↗
29. State of the art of produced water treatment10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139 ↗
30. Younas, F., Mustafa, A., Rahman Farooqi, Z.U., Wang, X., Younas, S., Mohy-Ud-Din, W., Hameed, M.A., Abrar, M.M., Maitlo, A.A., and Noreen, S. (2021). Current and emerging adsorbent technologies for wastewater treatment: Trends, limitations, and environmental implications. Water, 13.10.3390/w13020215 ↗
31. Davis, M. (2019). Water and Wastewater Engineering: Design Principles and Practice, McGraw Hill.
32. Edzwald, J. (2010). Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook on Drinking Water, McGraw Hill.
33. Nanofiltration membranes review: Recent advances and future prospects10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043 ↗
34. Recent advances in nanofiltration-based hybrid processes10.1016/j.desal.2023.116852 ↗
35. Green and Sustainable Membranes: A review10.1016/j.envres.2023.116133 ↗
36. Membrane processes for environmental remediation of nanomaterials: Potentials and challenges10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162569 ↗
37. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 ↗
38. Recent advances on microplastics pollution and removal from wastewater systems: A critical review10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118014 ↗
39. Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by membranes in water and wastewater: A review10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.044 ↗
40. Challenges and trends in membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: A review10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.09.007 ↗
41. Ultrafiltration membranes for wastewater and water process engineering: A comprehensive statistical review over the past decade10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101241 ↗
42. Ji, K., Liu, C., He, H., Mao, X., Wei, L., Wang, H., Zhang, M., Shen, Y., Sun, R., and Zhou, F. (2023). Research Progress of Water Treatment Technology Based on Nanofiber Membranes. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15030741 ↗
43. Differentiating Solutes with Precise Nanofiltration for Next Generation Environmental Separations: A Review10.1021/acs.est.0c04593 ↗
44. Progress of Ultrafiltration-Based Technology in Ion Removal and Recovery: Enhanced Membranes and Integrated Processes10.1021/acsestwater.2c00625 ↗
45. New trends in removing heavy metals from wastewater10.1007/s00253-016-7646-x ↗
46. Integrating Green Lean Six Sigma and industry 4.0: A conceptual framework10.1108/JMTM-03-2022-0115 ↗
47. Rajarajeswari, C., and Anbalagan, C. (Mater. Today Proc., 2023). Integration of the green and lean principles for more sustainable development: A case study, Mater. Today Proc., in press.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.275 ↗
48. Green Lean Six Sigma for sustainability improvement: A systematic review and future research agenda10.1108/IJLSS-06-2022-0132 ↗
49. Achieving the sustainable development goals through net zero emissions: Innovation-driven strategies for transitioning from incremental to radical lean, green and digital technologies10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107094 ↗
50. Towards a smart lean green production paradigm to improve operational performance10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137418 ↗
51. Elemure, I., Dhakal, H.N., Leseure, M., and Radulovic, J. (2023). Integration of Lean Green and Sustainability in Manufacturing: A Review on Current State and Future Perspectives. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151310261 ↗
52. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y ↗
53. Green-lean-six sigma practices and supporting factors for transitioning towards circular economy: A natural resource and intellectual capital-based view10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103789 ↗
54. Green Lean Six Sigma sustainability—Oriented project selection and implementation framework for manufacturing industry10.1108/IJLSS-12-2020-0212 ↗
55. Lean/Green integration focused on waste reduction techniques10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.107 ↗
56. The relationship between lean and environmental performance: Practices and measures10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.243 ↗
57. George, M., Blackwell, D., and Rajan, D. (2019). Lean Six Sigma in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Harnessing the Power of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, McGraw-Hill.
58. George, M., Works, J., and Watson-Hemphill, K. (2005). Fast Innovation: Achieving Superior Differentiation, Speed to Market, and Increased Profitability, McGraw-Hill.
59. Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: Review and analysis10.1039/C8CS00493E ↗
60. Tailored design of nanofiltration membranes for water treatment based on synthesis–property–performance relationships10.1039/D0CS01599G ↗
61. Optimization modelling of water quality in an uncertain environment10.1029/WR021i007p00934 ↗
62. Water Recovery from Urban Wastewater for Irrigation using Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration: Optimization and Performance10.1002/clen.202200280 ↗
63. Artificial intelligence as an upcoming technology in wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review10.1080/21622515.2021.1913242 ↗
64. Multivariate experimental design in environmental analysis10.1016/j.trac.2014.07.009 ↗
65. Fisher, R.A. (1990). Statistical Methods, Experimental Design, and Scientific Inference, Oxford University Press.10.2307/2532685 ↗
66. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., and Hunter, J.S. (2005). Statistics for Experimenters—Design, Innovation, and Discovery, Wiley.
67. Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., and Wu, Y. (2004). Quality Engineering Handbook, Wiley.10.1002/9780470258354 ↗
68. Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., and Taguchi, S. (2000). Robust Engineering: Learn How to Boost Quality while Reducing Costs and Time to Market, McGraw-Hill.
69. A Method for Analyzing Unreplicated Agricultural Experiments10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0255 ↗
70. Assessing effects of unreplicated perturbations: No simple solutions10.2307/1940685 ↗
71. Options for statistical analysis of unreplicated paired design drainage experiments10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106604 ↗
72. Analyzing unreplicated factorial experiments: A review with some new proposals
73. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968 ↗
74. An approach to evaluating screening experiments when several responses are measured10.1016/0169-7439(92)80004-N ↗
75. Nicolis, G., and Prigogine, I. (1977). Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations, Wiley.
76. Prigogine, I. (1997). The End of Certainty, Free Press.
77. Statistical modeling: The two cultures10.1214/ss/1009213726 ↗
78. Concurrent multiresponse multifactorial screening of an electrodialysis process of polluted wastewater using robust non-linear Taguchi profiling10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.103997 ↗
79. Besseris, G. (2021). Micro-Clustering and Rank-Learning Profiling of a Small Water-Quality Multi-Index Dataset to Improve a Recycling Process. Water, 13.10.3390/w13182469 ↗
80. Besseris, G. (2022). Wastewater Quality Screening Using Affinity Propagation Clustering and Entropic Methods for Small Saturated Nonlinear Orthogonal Datasets. Water, 14.10.3390/w14081238 ↗
81. Swarm intelligence for self-organized clustering10.1016/j.artint.2020.103237 ↗
82. Thrun, M.C. (2018). Projection-Based Clustering through Self-Organization and Swarm Intelligence, Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-20540-9 ↗
83. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function-Part II10.1007/BF02289621 ↗
84. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis10.1007/BF02289565 ↗
85. A cluster separation measure10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909 ↗
86. Non-cooperative games10.2307/1969529 ↗
87. Variations of box plots10.1080/00031305.1978.10479236 ↗
88. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data
89. Beanplot: A boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions10.18637/jss.v028.c01 ↗
90. R Core Team (2023). R (Version 4.3.1): A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
91. The proof and measurement of association between two things10.2307/1412159 ↗
92. Zwillinger, D., and Kokoska, S. (2000). Standard Probability and Statistical Tables and Formula, Chapman & Hall.10.1201/9780367802417 ↗
93. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗
94. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distibuzione
95. Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions10.1214/aoms/1177730256 ↗
96. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916 ↗