Sensitivity Analysis of Regression-Based Trend Estimates to Input Errors in Spatial Downscaling of Coarse Resolution Remote Sensing Data
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper compared the predictive performance of different regression models for trend component estimation in the spatial downscaling of coarse resolution satellite data using area-to-point regression kriging in the context of the sensitivity to input data errors. Three regression models, linear regression, random forest, and support vector regression, were applied to trend component estimation. An experiment on downscaling synthetic Landsat data with different noise levels demonstrated that a regression model with higher explanatory power and residual correction led to the highest predictive performance only when the input coarse resolution data were assumed to be error-free. Through an experiment on spatial downscaling of coarse resolution monthly Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2 soil moisture products with significant errors, we found that the higher explanatory power of regression models did not always lead to better predictive performance. The residual correction and normalization of trend components also degraded the predictive performance. Using trend components as a final downscaling result showed the best performance in both experiments as the input errors increased. As the predictive performance of spatial downscaling results is susceptible to input errors, the findings of this study should be considered to evaluate downscaling results and develop advanced spatial downscaling methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cryospheric studies and observations · Climate change and permafrost · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea
Department of Environment, Energy, and Geoinformatics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
Funding
Inha University
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Multisource and multitemporal data fusion in remote sensing: A comprehensive review of the state of the art10.1109/MGRS.2018.2890023 ↗
2. An overview of theoretical and practical issues in spatial downscaling of coarse resolution satellite-derived products
3. Deep learning for downscaling remote sensing images: Fusion and super-resolution10.1109/MGRS.2022.3171836 ↗
4. Downscaling in remote sensing
5. Spatial downscaling of TRMM precipitation using vegetation response on the Iberian Peninsula10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.004 ↗
6. A statistical spatial downscaling algorithm of TRMM precipitation based on NDVI and DEM in the Qaidam Basin of China10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.009 ↗
7. Statistical downscaling of precipitation using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.022 ↗
8. Downscaling the GPM-based satellite precipitation retrievals using gradient boosting decision tree approach over Mainland China10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126803 ↗
9. Yan, X., Chen, H., Tian, B., Sheng, S., Wang, J., and Kim, J.-S. (2021). A downscaling–merging scheme for improving daily spatial precipitation estimates based on random forest and cokriging. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13112040 ↗
10. Review on spatial downscaling of satellite derived precipitation estimates10.1007/s12665-023-11115-7 ↗
11. A microwave-optical/infrared disaggregation for improving spatial representation of soil moisture using AMSR-E and MODIS products10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.009 ↗
12. Downscaling AMSR-2 soil moisture data with geographically weighted area-to-area regression kriging10.1109/TGRS.2017.2778420 ↗
13. Downscaling SMAP soil moisture estimation with gradient boosting decision tree regression over the Tibetan Plateau10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.022 ↗
14. Downscaling of soil moisture products using deep learning: Comparison and analysis on Tibetan Plateau10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127570 ↗
15. Nadeem, A.A., Zha, Y., Shi, L., Ali, S., Wang, X., Zafar, Z., Afzal, Z., and Tariq, M.A.U.R. (2023). Spatial downscaling and gap-filling of SMAP soil moisture to high resolution using MODIS surface variables and machine learning approaches over ShanDian River Basin, China. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15030812 ↗
16. Downscaling land surface temperatures at regional scales with random forest regression10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.006 ↗
17. Bartkowiak, P., Castelli, M., and Notarnicola, C. (2019). Downscaling land surface temperature from MODIS dataset with random forest approach over Alpine vegetated areas. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11111319 ↗
18. Spatial downscaling of MODIS land surface temperature: Recent research trends, challenges, and future directions
19. Ouyang, X., Dou, Y., Yang, J., Chen, X., and Wen, J. (2022). High spatiotemporal rugged land surface temperature downscaling over Saihanba Forest Park, China. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14112617 ↗
20. Liang, M., Zhang, L., Wu, S., Zhu, Y., Dai, Z., Wang, Y., Qi, J., Chen, Y., and Du, Z. (2023). A high-resolution land surface temperature downscaling method based on geographically weighted neural network regression. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15071740 ↗
21. Downscaling MODIS images with area-to-point regression kriging10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.003 ↗
22. Fusion of Sentinel-2 images10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.030 ↗
23. Area-to-point regression kriging approach fusion of Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel 2 data for assessment of soil macronutrients at Anaimalai, Coimbatore10.1007/s10661-022-10571-1 ↗
24. Object-based area-to-point regression kriging for pansharpening10.1109/TGRS.2020.3041724 ↗
25. Downscaling satellite night-time lights imagery to support within-city applications using a spatially non-stationary model
26. Impact of trend estimates on predictive performance in model evaluation for spatial downscaling of satellite-based precipitation data10.7780/kjrs.2017.33.1.3 ↗
27. Assessing the impacts of errors in coarse scale data on the performance of spatial downscaling: An experiment with synthetic satellite precipitation products10.7780/kjrs.2017.33.1.3 ↗
28. A geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation10.1111/j.1538-4632.2004.tb01135.x ↗
29. Area-to-point regression kriging for pan-sharpening10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.02.006 ↗
30. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
31. A comparison of Gaussian process regression, random forests and support vector regression for burn severity assessment in diseased forests10.1080/2150704X.2014.963733 ↗
32. Automatic parameter optimization for support vector regression for land and sea surface temperature estimation from remote sensing data10.1109/TGRS.2008.2005993 ↗
33. (2023, July 14). Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org.
34. (2023, July 03). Agrometeorological Information Service. Available online: http://weather.rda.go.kr/w/index.do.
35. Jin, Y., Ge, Y., Wang, J., Heuvelink, G.B.M., and Wang, L. (2018). Geographically weighted area-to-point regression kriging for spatial downscaling in remote sensing. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10040579 ↗
36. A value-consistent method for downscaling SMAP passive soil moisture with MODIS products using self-adaptive window10.1109/TGRS.2019.2941696 ↗
37. Li, N., Wu, H., and Ouyang, X. (2022). Localized downscaling of urban land surface temperature—A case study in Beijing, China. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14102390 ↗
38. Filtered kriging for spatial data with heterogeneous measurement error variances10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01563.x ↗
39. A geostatistical approach to spatial quality assessment of coarse spatial resolution remote sensing products10.1155/2019/7297593 ↗