journal article·2023-08-15Open access

Investigating the Impact of Different Partial Overlap Levels on the Perception of Visual Variables for Categorical Data

Diego Santos, Alexandre Freitas, Rodrigo Lima, Carlos Gustavo Santos, Bianchi Meiguins

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 16

Abstract

The overlap of visual items in data visualization techniques is a known problem aggravated by data volume and available visual space issues. Several methods have been applied to mitigate occlusion in data visualizations, such as random jitter, transparency, layout reconfiguration, focus+context techniques, etc. This paper aims to present a comparative study of the reading of visual variables values with partial overlap. The study focuses on categorical data representations varying the percentage limits of partial overlap and the number of distinct values for each visual variable: hue, lightness, saturation, shape, text, orientation, and texture. A computational application generated random scenarios for a unique visual pattern target to perform location tasks. Each scenario involved presentation of the visual items in a grid layout with 160 elements (10 × 16), each visual variable had from three to five distinct values encoded, and the partial overlap percentages applied, represented by a gray square in the center of each grid element, were 0% (control), 50%, 60%, and 70%. Similar to the preliminary tests, the tests conducted in this study involved 48 participants organized into four groups, with 126 tasks per participant, and the application captured the response and time for each task performed. The results analysis indicated that the hue, lightness, and shape visual variables were robust to high percentages of occlusion and gradual increase in encoded visual values. The text visual variable showed promising results for accuracy, and the resolution time was a little higher than for the last visual variables mentioned. In contrast, the texture visual variable presented lower accuracy to high levels of occlusion and more different visual encoding values. Finally, the orientation and saturation visual variables exhibited the highest error and worst perfomance rates during the tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Data Visualization and Analytics · Image and Video Quality Assessment · Data Analysis with R

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Science Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil

Funding

Federal University of Pará (UFPA)

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Scheepens, R., Wetering, H.V.D., and Wijk, J.J.V. (2014, January 4–7). Non-overlapping Aggregated Multivariate Glyphs for Moving Objects. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, Yokohama, Japan.10.1109/PacificVis.2014.13 ↗
2. Identification of partially occluded map symbols10.14714/CP76.59 ↗
3. The analysis of visual variables for use in the cartographic design of point symbols for mobile Augmented Reality applications10.2478/v10277-012-0019-4 ↗
4. Ellis, G., and Dix, A. (2002, January 10–12). Density control through random sampling: An architectural perspective. Proceedings of the Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation, London, UK.
5. A review and taxonomy of distortion-oriented presentation techniques10.1145/180171.180173 ↗
6. Shneiderman, B. (1996, January 3–6). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Proceedings of the Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual languages, Boulder, CO, USA.
7. Keim, D.A. (1997, January 14–17). Visual techniques for exploring databases. Proceedings of the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD’97), Newport Beach, CA, USA.
8. Keim, D., and Herrmann, A. (1998, January 18–23). The Gridfit algorithm: An efficient and effective approach to visualizing large amounts of spatial data. Proceedings of the Proceedings Visualization 98 (Cat. No.98CB36276), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
9. Revealing Structure in Visualizations of Dense 2D and 3D Parallel Coordinates10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500117 ↗
10. Bederson, B.B., Shneiderman, B., and Wattenberg, M. (2003). The Craft of Information Visualization, Elsevier.
11. Stasko, J., and Zhang, E. (2000, January 9–10). Focus+context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, space-filling hierarchy visualizations. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000, INFOVIS 2000, Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
12. Lima, R.S.d.A.D., Santos, C.G.R.d., and Meiguins, B.S. (2019, January 20–25). IDUVis: An Interactive Dashboard for Uncertainty Visualization and Analysis-Vast Challenge 2019 MC1 Award for Supporting Situation Awareness and Anomaly Detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
13. Ribeiro, R.S.T. (2016). Sensorial do Corpo: Via Régia ao Inconsciente, UFF.
14. Measuring visual clutter10.1167/7.2.17 ↗
15. Santos, D.H., Marques Soares, A.G., do Amor Divino Lima, R.S., Miranda, E.T.C., dos Santos, C.G.R., and Meiguins, B.S. (2019, January 2–5). Analyzing the Effect of Different Partial Overlap Sizes in Perceiving Visual Variables. Proceedings of the 2019 23rd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV), Paris, France.
16. Munzner, T. (2014). Visualization Analysis and Design, AK Peters/CRC Press.10.1201/b17511 ↗
17. Bertin, J., Berg, W.J., and Wainer, H. (1983). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps, University of Wisconsin Press Madison.
18. Using color effectively in computer graphics10.1109/38.773961 ↗
19. Constructing cylindrical coordinate colour spaces10.1016/j.patrec.2007.11.002 ↗
20. Ware, C. (2012). Information Visualization: Perception for Design, Elsevier.
21. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information10.1145/22949.22950 ↗
22. Causse, M., and Hurter, C. (2009). Human Centered Design, Springer.
23. Carpendale, M.S.T. (2003). Considering Visual Variables as a Basis for Information Visualisation, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary. Research Report 2001-693-16.
24. Ward, M., Grinstein, G., and Keim, D. (2015). Interactive Data Visualization Foundations, Techniques, and Applications, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/b18379 ↗
25. Forsell, C. (2010, January 26–29). A guide to scientific evaluation in information visualization. Proceedings of the 2010 14th International Conference Information Visualisation, London, UK.10.1109/IV.2010.33 ↗
26. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife10.1214/aos/1176344552 ↗
27. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/9780429246593 ↗
28. Overlapping Graduated Circles/Magnitude Estimation and Method of Portrayal
29. Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080 ↗
30. Graham, M., Kennedy, J., and Hand, C. (1999, January 5–6). The challenge of visualising multiple overlapping classification hierarchies. Proceedings of the Proceedings User Interfaces to Data Intensive Systems, Los Alamitos, CA, USA.10.1109/UIDIS.1999.791461 ↗
31. Theron, R., Santamaria, R., Garcia, J., Gomez, D., and Paz-Madrid, V. (2007). Infovis Confererence Compendium, Available online: https://cs.au.dk/~hjschulz/fulltexts/compendium2007.pdf.
32. Brath, R. (2012, January 2). Multi-attribute glyphs on Venn and Euler diagrams to represent data and aid visual decoding. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Euler Diagrams, Canterbury, UK.
33. Learning Perceptual Kernels for Visualization Design10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346978 ↗
34. Zhang, C., Carmichael, R., Yin, Z., and Gong, X. (2020, January 25–30). ClusterLens: A Focus+Context Approach to Multi-Resolution Spatial Clustering. Proceedings of the CHI EA ’20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3334480.3382803 ↗
35. Soares, A.G.M., dos Santos, D.H., Barbosa, C.L.R., Goncalves, A.S., dos Santos, C.G.R., Meiguins, B.S., and Miranda, E.T.C. (2018, January 10–13). Visualizing Multidimensional Data in Treemaps with Adaptive Glyphs. Proceedings of the 2018 22nd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV), Fisciano, Italy.10.1109/iV.2018.00021 ↗
36. Henrique Ichihara Pires, A., Santos do Amor Divino Lima, R., Gustavo Resque dos Santos, C., Serique Meiguins, B., and Gregório Marques Soares, A. (2020, January 7–11). A summarization glyph for sets of unreadable visual items in treemaps. Proceedings of the 2020 24th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV), Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/IV51561.2020.00047 ↗
37. Soares, A.G.M., Miranda, E.T.C., Lima, R.S.d.A.D., Resque dos Santos, C.G., and Meiguins, B.S. (2020). Depicting More Information in Enriched Squarified Treemaps with Layered Glyphs. Information, 11.10.3390/info11020123 ↗
38. Bootstrap confidence intervals (with discussion)10.1214/ss/1032280214 ↗
39. A Multi-Level Typology of Abstract Visualization Tasks10.1109/TVCG.2013.124 ↗