journal article·2023-06-29Open access

Joint Radar-Communication Optimization of Distributed Airborne Radar for AOA Localization

Gangsong Ding, Qinhao Wu, Yutao Hu, Jianfeng Yin, Shengtao Wen

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 13

Abstract

Compared to the distributed ground-based radar (DGBR), the distributed airborne radar (DAR) has been widely applied due to its stronger anti-damage ability, more degrees of freedom, and better detection view of targets. However, unlike DGBR, the premise for the normal operation of DAR is to maintain stable wireless communication between unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). This requires each UAV to make reasonable use of its electromagnetic domain resources. That is, to maximize radar detection performance while ensuring communication performance constraints. However, current research in the field of radar resource allocation has not taken this into account, which greatly limits the practical application of optimization algorithms. Moreover, the current research tends to adopt centralized optimization algorithms. When the baseline of the UAV swarm is long, applying multi-relay methods directly results in heavy communications overhead and long-time delay. Based on the above background, this article aimed to develop a fully distributed algorithm for the joint optimization of radar detection performance and communication transmission performance. This study first took the measurement angle of arrival (AOA) as an example to provide a system model with communication constraints. This model considers the impact of factors such as the UAV location error, UAV communication coverage, and dynamic communication topology of the UAV on joint optimization. A formal representation of the joint optimization is presented. Then, we proposed a joint radar-communication optimization (JRCO) algorithm to fully utilize the electromagnetic domain resources of each UAV. Finally, numerical simulations verified the effectiveness of the proposed JRCO algorithm to traditional radar resource allocation methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radar Systems and Signal Processing · UAV Applications and Optimization · Air Traffic Management and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

People Liberation Army Troop 91431, Haikou 570100, China

Intelligent Gaming and Decision-Making Laboratory, Beijing 100010, China

Beijing Satellite Navigation Center, Beijing 100094, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, H., Yu, L., Chen, Y., and Wei, Y. (2021). Fast complex-valued CNN for radar jamming signal recognition. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13152867 ↗
2. Lang, B., and Gong, J. (2022). JR-TFViT: A Lightweight Efficient Radar Jamming Recognition Network Based on Global Representation of the Time–Frequency Domain. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11172794 ↗
3. Hou, Y., Ren, H., Lv, Q., Wu, L., Yang, X., and Quan, Y. (2022). Radar-Jamming Classification in the Event of Insufficient Samples Using Transfer Learning. Symmetry, 14.10.3390/sym14112318 ↗
4. Chen, J., Zheng, H., Su, M., Du, T., Lin, C., and Ji, S. (2019, January 6–8). Invisible poisoning: Highly stealthy targeted poisoning attack. Proceedings of the Information Security and Cryptology: 15th International Conference, Inscrypt 2019, Nanjing, China. Revised Selected Papers 15, 2020.
5. Banerjee, P., Chu, L., Zhang, Y., Lakshmanan, L.V., and Wang, L. (2021, January 19–22). Stealthy targeted data poisoning attack on knowledge graphs. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Chania, Greece.10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00202 ↗
6. Radar deception jamming recognition based on weighted ensemble CNN with transfer learning
7. A novel deceptive jamming approach against frequency diverse array radar10.1109/JSEN.2020.3045757 ↗
8. Pieraccini, M., and Miccinesi, L. (2019). Ground-based radar interferometry: A bibliographic review. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11091029 ↗
9. Resource scheduling for distributed multi-target tracking in netted colocated MIMO radar systems10.1109/TSP.2020.2976587 ↗
10. Joint target assignment and power allocation in multiple distributed MIMO radar networks10.1109/JSYST.2020.2986020 ↗
11. Distributed coherent microwave photonic radar with a high-precision fiber-optic time and frequency network10.1364/OE.405465 ↗
12. Low probability of intercept-based collaborative power and bandwidth allocation strategy for multi-target tracking in distributed radar network system10.1109/JSEN.2020.2977328 ↗
13. Distributed radar sounder: A novel concept for subsurface investigations using sensors in formation flight10.1109/TGRS.2019.2929422 ↗
14. Lembo, L., Ghelfi, P., and Bogoni, A. (2019, January 26–28). Antenna position optimization in a MIMO distributed radar network through genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Radar Symposium (IRS), Ulm, Germany.10.23919/IRS.2019.8768101 ↗
15. Wang, S., Liu, G., Jing, G., Feng, Q., Liu, H., and Guo, Y. (2022). State-of-the-art review of ground penetrating radar (GPR) applications for railway ballast inspection. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22072450 ↗
16. Time and phase synchronization using clutter observations in airborne distributed coherent aperture radars10.1016/j.cja.2021.08.040 ↗
17. Identifiability Analysis of Positioning and Synchronization Errors in Airborne Distributed Coherence Aperture Radars10.1109/JSEN.2022.3144481 ↗
18. Design and research on a power distribution system for airborne radar10.1049/joe.2018.8636 ↗
19. Deployment algorithms for UAV airborne networks toward on-demand coverage10.1109/JSAC.2018.2864376 ↗
20. Miao, Y., Liu, F., Liu, H., and Li, H. (2022). Clutter Jamming Suppression for Airborne Distributed Coherent Aperture Radar Based on Prior Clutter Subspace Projection. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14235912 ↗
21. Liggins, M.E., and Chong, C.-Y. (1997, January 13–15). Distributed multi-platform fusion for enhanced radar management. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE National Radar Conference, Syracuse, NY, USA.
22. Brandfass, M., Dallinger, A., and Weidmann, K. (2018, January 20–22). Modular, scalable multifunction airborne radar systems for high performance ISR applications. Proceedings of the 2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS), Bonn, Germany.10.23919/IRS.2018.8447951 ↗
23. Duk, V., Wojaczek, P., Rosenberg, L., Cristallini, D., and O’Hagan, D.W. (2020, January 21–25). Airborne passive radar detection for the APART-GAS trial. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf20), Florence, Italy.10.1109/RadarConf2043947.2020.9266436 ↗
24. An adaptive range-angle-Doppler processing approach for FDA-MIMO radar using three-dimensional localization10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2615269 ↗
25. Tracking and track management of extended targets in range-Doppler using range-compressed airborne radar data
26. Wang, W., and Wang, Y. (2020, January 12–14). A Parameter-Optimized SLS-TSVM Method for Working Modes Recognition of Airborne Fire Control Radar. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), Chongqing, China.10.1109/ITNEC48623.2020.9084981 ↗
27. Nenashev, V., Sentsov, A., and Shepeta, A. (2019, January 3–7). Formation of radar image the earth’s surface in the front zone review two-position systems airborne radar. Proceedings of the 2019 Wave Electronics and its Application in Information and Telecommunication Systems (WECONF), Saint Petersburg, Russia.10.1109/WECONF.2019.8840641 ↗
28. Joint resource allocation scheme for target tracking in distributed MIMO radar systems10.21629/JSEE.2019.04.09 ↗
29. Joint transmit resources and trajectory planning for target tracking in airborne radar networks
30. Power Minimization-Based Joint Resource Allocation Algorithm for Target Localization in Noncoherent Distributed MIMO Radar System10.1109/JSYST.2021.3126152 ↗
31. Xu, S., Dogançay, K., and Hmam, H. (2016, January 20–25). Distributed path optimization of multiple UAVs for AOA target localization. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7472256 ↗
32. Distributed pseudolinear estimation and UAV path optimization for 3D AOA target tracking10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.10.012 ↗
33. 3D AOA target tracking using distributed sensors with multi-hop information sharing10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.10.014 ↗
34. Tutte, W.T., and Tutte, W.T. (2001). Graph Theory, Cambridge University Press.
35. On information resolution of radar systems10.1109/TAES.2012.6324679 ↗
36. Optimal sensor placement for 3-D angle-of-arrival target localization10.1109/TAES.2017.2667999 ↗
37. Optimal sensor placement for target localization using hybrid RSS, AOA and TOA measurements10.1109/LCOMM.2020.2996259 ↗
38. Optimal sensor-target geometries for 3-D static target localization using received-signal-strength measurements10.1109/LSP.2019.2913337 ↗
39. Optimal TOA-sensor placement for two target localization simultaneously using shared sensors10.1109/LCOMM.2021.3083058 ↗
40. 3D channel characterization and performance analysis of UAV-assisted millimeter wave links10.1109/TWC.2020.3023477 ↗
41. An explicit solution for target localization in noncoherent distributed MIMO radar systems10.1109/LSP.2014.2325999 ↗
42. Ge, M., Cui, G., Shi, Q., Kong, L., and Li, N. (2019, January 22–26). Mainlobe jamming suppression based on joint blind source separation for distributed radar. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/RADAR.2019.8835789 ↗