Activation Analyses of Disposal Options for Irradiated Be12Ti
Source abstract
Abstract
The activity and disposal options for irradiated Be12Ti were assessed for the HCPB DEMO blankets making use of a code system that enables performing 3D activation calculations by linking the Monte Carlo transport code MCNP and the fusion inventory code FISPACT through an appropriate interface. The dedicated full-scale geometry MCNP model of the 11.25 degree HCPB DEMO torus was adapted to the requirements for the coupled 3D neutron transport and activation calculations. Special attention was paid to the use in the activation calculations of the commercial materials containing technological impurities. This has a crucial effect on the results and the impurities must be accounted for in any nuclear safety analyses. The short-term activity is formed by the radionuclides produced through the activation of Be and Ti nuclei and the long-term activity is formed by the products of the neutron irradiation taking place on the impurities. A prerequisite for the disposal or the recycling of the irradiated Be12Ti is its deep detritiation; otherwise, the very high-tritium activity would fully prevent any attempt for its treatment. The most preferable is the use of the Be12Ti with the composition including less material impurities, especially uranium. There could be the option to dispose the Be12Ti intermediate-level wastes in the French repository after 1 year of cooling, assuming the detailed control of the impurities that fulfil the French authority requirements. The USA near-ground repositories could be an alternative to the European sites. The recycling of the irradiated Be12Ti must first be elaborated and approved to ensure its treatment in a safe and efficient way. The remote handling technique must be developed for the re-fabrication of the Be12Ti blocks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, 76344 Karlsruhe, Germany
EUROFUSION Programme Management Unit, Fusion Technology Department—DEMO Central Team, Boltzmannstrasse 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
Funding
Euratom Research and Training Programme
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Maturation of critical technologies and systems design10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113082 ↗
2. Arena, P., Del Nevo, A., Moro, F., Noce, S., Mozzillo, R., Imbriani, V., Giannetti, F., Edemetti, F., Froio, A., and Savoldi, L. (2021). The DEMO Water-Cooled Lead–Lithium Breeding Blanket: Design Status at the End of the Pre-Conceptual Design Phase. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411592 ↗
3. Consolidated design of the HCPB Breeding Blanket for the pre-Conceptual Design Phase of the EU DEMO and harmonization with the ITER HCPB TBM program10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111614 ↗
4. Kelly, T.D., and Matos, G.R. (2023, June 18). U.S. Geological Survey, Beryllium statistics. Historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 140, Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/historical-statistics-mineral-and-material-commodities#bariteandhttps://www.usgs.gov/media/files/beryllium-historical-statistics-data-series-140.
5. U.S. Geological Survey (2022). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2022, U.S. Geological Survey.
6. Comparative activation analyses for the HCPB breeding blanket in DEMO10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112338 ↗
7. Schulz, K.J., DeYoung, J.H., Seal, R.R., and Bradley, D.C. (2017). Critical Mineral Resources of the United States—Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply, USGS. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1802.10.3133/pp1802 ↗
8. Industrial-scale manufacturing experience of titanium beryllide block for DEMO blanket application10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111862 ↗
9. (2023, June 18). Available online: https://materion.com/products/beryllium-products/beryllium-metal.
10. On use of beryllium in fusion reactors: Resources, impurities and necessity of detritiation after irradiation10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.02.073 ↗
11. International Atomic Energy Agency (2004). Application of the Concepts of Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance: Safety Guide, International Atomic Energy Agency. no. RS-G-1.7. STI/PUB/1202.
12. Initial layout of DEMO buildings and configuration of the main plant systems10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.02.101 ↗
13. Werner, C.J. (2017). MCNP User’s Manual Code Version 6.2., MCNP. Los Alamos National Laboratory Tech. Rep. LA-UR-17-29981.
14. Fleming, M., Stainer, T., and Gilbert, M. (2018). The FISPACT II User Manual, UK Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Science Center. UKAEA-R(18)001;.
15. The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.310.1140/epja/s10050-020-00141-9 ↗
16. TENDL: Complete Nuclear Data Library for Innovative Nuclear Science and Technology10.1016/j.nds.2019.01.002 ↗
17. Activation and decay heat analysis of the European DEMO blanket concepts10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.02.100 ↗
18. Tritium release and retention in beryllium and titanium beryllide after neutron irradiation up to damage doses of 23-38 dpa10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111938 ↗
19. International Atomic Energy Agency (2009). Classification of Radioactive Waste, IAEA.
20. Overview on the management of radioactive waste from fusion facilities: ITER, demonstration machines and power plants10.1088/1741-4326/ac62f7 ↗
21. Bergström, U., Pers, K., and Almén, Y. (2011). International Perspective on Repositories for Low Level Waste, SKB International AB. SKB R-11-16.
22. Waste implications from minor impurities in European DEMO materials10.1088/1741-4326/ab154e ↗
23. (2023, June 18). UK Department of Energy & Climate Change. Strategy for the Management of Solid Low Level Radioactive Waste from the Non-Nuclear Industry in the United Kingdom, 2016, Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/497114/NI_LLW_Strategy_Final.pdf,.
24. Characterization and acceptance criteria of conditioned radioactive wastes at El Cabril disposal facility10.1016/S0029-5493(96)01352-0 ↗
25. Morales, A. (March, January 27). El Cabril low and intermediate level waste disposal facility (Spain): New acceptance criteria. Proceedings of the Waste Management Symposium 2005, Tucson, AZ, USA. Available online: https://archivedproceedings.econference.io/wmsym/pdfs/5035.pdf.
26. Kekki, T., and Tiitta, A. (2000). Evaluation of the Radioactive Waste Characterisation at the Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant, VTT Chemical Technology. STUK-YTO-TR162.
27. Cox, B. (2012). Basis for National and International Low Activity and Very Low Level Waste Disposal Classifications, EPRI.
28. Gagner, L., and Voini, S. (2000, January 19–22). Derivation of waste acceptance criteria for low intermediate level waste in surface disposal facility, activity limits at the Centre de l’Aube. Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
29. (2023, June 18). Upstream Optioneering ILW/LLW Opportunities: Identification of Potential Opportunities for ILW/LLW Boundary Wastes Introduced by Changing Disposal Route, June 2014, AMEC, 201139-AA-0004/001/Issue 1, Available online: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20211004151355/https://rwm.nda.gov.uk/publication/upstream-optioneering-llw-ilw-opportunities-identification-of-potential-opportunities-for-ilw-llw-boundary-wastes-introduced-by-changing-disposal-route/?download.
30. (2023, June 18). Agence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs (Andra), Centre de Stockage de l’Aube (CSA)—INB n°149, Demande de Modification Portant sur la Prise en Charge de Colis de Sources Scellées Usagées de Forte Activité, Lettre ASN CODEP-CHA-2018-023387 du 13 Juin 2018, Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire (IRSN). Available online: https://www.irsn.fr/sites/default/files/documents/expertise/avis/2019/Avis-IRSN-2019-00179.pdf.
31. ANDRA (2014). ACO.SP.ASRE.99.001D and ACO.SP.ASRE.99.0002D ANDRA Specifications, ANDRA.
32. An integrated approach to the back-end of the fusion materials cycle
33. NEA, and OECD (2019). Preservation of Records. Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) across Generations: Compiling a Set of Essential Records for a Radioactive Waste Repository, OECD. No. 7423.
34. Daniels, N., Deissmann, G., Modolo, G., and Bosbach, D. (2021). Fachlicher Abschlussbericht des BMBF geförderten Verbundvorhabens: “Konzeptstudie zur Entsorgung von Aktiviertem Beryllium aus Forschungsreaktoren (KONEKT)“, Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Förderkennzeichen 15S9405A-B.
35. Brennecke, P. (2015). Requirements on Radioactive Waste for Disposal (Waste Acceptance Requirements as of December 2014), BfS—Federal Office for Radiation Protection. Konrad Repository; SE-IB-29/08-REV-2.
36. (2023, June 18). United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Waste Classification §61.55, Part 61—Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste. NRC Regulations Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Available online: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part061/part061-0055.html.
37. Druyts, F., Dylst, K., and Braet, J. (2007, January 5–7). Beryllium recycling: Feasibility and challenges. Proceedings of the 8th IEA International Workshop on Beryllium Technology, Lisbon, Portugal.
38. Decontamination of irradiated beryllium from radioactive impurities by precipitation of hydroxides in the presence of a complexone10.1134/S1066362215010142 ↗