Prediction of Reinforcement Connection Loads in Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Walls Using Response Surface Method
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an improved earth pressure method that considers the capacity of a wall toe to carry an earth load to predict the connection loads of GRS segmental walls constructed with cohesionless backfills on competent foundations. In this method, a response surface model (RSM) of the lateral earth pressure coefficient replaces the Coulomb active earth pressure coefficient. The parameters of the RSM were determined from numerical studies on the impacts of toe restraint, wall geometry, and backfill properties on the distribution of earth loads between the toe and reinforcement layers. The unknown coefficients of the RSM were obtained through a regression analysis of 705 reinforcement load values from 65 simulated walls. The proposed method was compared to the earth pressure method and the stiffness method using measured connection loads from field and centrifuge GRS segmental walls. The results show that the predictions of the proposed RSM method are in better agreement with the measurements than those of the stiffness method and the earth pressure method, whether under a typical or poor toe restraint condition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science and Technology Program of the Shaanxi Province, China
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Effect of water-cooling shock on fracture initiation and morphology of high-temperature granite: Application of hydraulic fracturing to enhanced geothermal systems10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120858 ↗
2. Experimental investigations on effects of gas pressure on mechanical behaviors and failure characteristic of coals10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.05.013 ↗
3. The hydro-mechanical characteristics and micro-structure of loess enhanced by microbially induced carbonate precipitation10.1016/j.gete.2023.100469 ↗
4. Experimental study on the mechanism of ice layer formation in fractured rock masses in cold regions10.1038/s41598-022-22735-7 ↗
5. Chen, Y., Zhao, W., Jia, P., Han, J., and Guan, Y. (2019). Dynamic behavior of an embedded foundation under horizontal vibration in a poroelastic half-space. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9040740 ↗
6. Recent practice and research of geosynthetic-reinforced earth structures in Japan
7. A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls10.1139/t03-051 ↗
8. Refinement of K-stiffness method for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls10.1680/gein.2008.15.4.269 ↗
9. The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls10.1139/t06-076 ↗
10. Design and performance of 6.3-m-high, block-faced geogrid wall design using K-stiffness method10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001013 ↗
11. Performance of an 11 m high block-faced geogrid wall designed using the K-stiffness Method10.1139/cgj-2013-0261 ↗
12. Physical and numerical modelling of a geogrid-reinforced incremental concrete panel retaining wall10.1139/cgj-2016-0207 ↗
13. Case history on failure of geosynthetics-reinforced soil bridge approach retaining walls10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.08.001 ↗
14. Evaluation of required connection load in GRS-IBS structures under service loads10.1680/jgein.20.00022 ↗
15. Berg, R.R., Christopher, B.R., and Samtani, N.C. (2009). Design of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Slopes, No. FHWA-NHI-10-024.
16. Improved simplified method for prediction of loads in reinforced soil walls10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001355 ↗
17. Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions10.1139/t05-040 ↗
18. A numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:6(673) ↗
19. Influence of toe restraint on reinforced soil segmental walls10.1139/T10-002 ↗
20. Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.012 ↗
21. Evaluation of the combined effect of toe resistance and facing inclination on the behavior of GRS walls10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.12.003 ↗
22. Unified design approach to geosynthetic reinforced slopes and segmental walls10.1680/gein.2.0039 ↗
23. Analyzing reinforcement loads of vertical geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls considering toe restraint10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000840 ↗
24. Required unfactored strength of geosynthetic in reinforced earth structures10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000209 ↗
25. Application of the Simplified Stiffness Method to design of reinforced soil walls10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001874 ↗
26. Evaluating reinforcement loading within surcharged segmental block reinforced soil walls using a limit state framework10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.010 ↗
27. Franco, Y.B., Utili, S., and Da Silva, J.L. (Géotechnique, 2022). Design of reinforced cohesive soil walls accounting for wall facing contribution to stability, Géotechnique, in press.10.1680/jgeot.21.00119 ↗
28. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2020). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [9th ed.].
29. Impact of toe resistance in reinforced masonry block walls: Design dilemma10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000579 ↗
30. Numerical evaluation of the effect of foundation on the behaviour of reinforced soil walls10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.11.007 ↗
31. Effects of facing, reinforcement stiffness, toe resistance, and height on reinforced walls10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.07.006 ↗
32. Influence of toe restraint conditions on performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls using centrifuge model tests10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103469 ↗
33. Influence of facing toe condition on the bearing capacity of full-height panel MSE walls10.1680/jgein.21.00039a ↗
34. Finite element reliability analysis of reinforced retaining walls10.1080/17486020903576788 ↗
35. Probabilistic assessment of reinforced soil wall performance using response surface method10.1680/jgein.17.00019 ↗
36. System reliability analysis of geosynthetic reinforced soil slope considering local reinforcement failure10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103563 ↗
37. Deterministic and probabilistic prediction of maximum wall facing displacement of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls using multivariate adaptive regression splines10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100816 ↗
38. Predictive modeling on seismic performances of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.005 ↗
39. Deterministic and probabilistic prediction of facing deformations of geosynthetic-reinforced MSE walls using a response surface approach10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.013 ↗
40. Probabilistic prediction of reinforcement loads for steel MSE walls using a response surface method10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001120 ↗
41. Numerical modeling of the SR-18 geogrid reinforced modular block retaining walls10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001438 ↗
42. Lade, P.V., and Lee, K.L. (1976). Engineering Properties of Soils, University of California. Report UCLA-ENG-7652.
43. Vertical-facing loads in steel-reinforced soil walls10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000874 ↗
44. Numerical evaluation of the behavior of GRS walls with segmental block facing under working stress conditions10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001235 ↗
45. Geosynthetic reinforcement stiffness for analytical and numerical modelling of reinforced soil structures10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.01.003 ↗
46. Numerical modeling of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls with different toe restraint conditions10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.09.002 ↗
47. Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures for railways in Japan10.1007/s40515-013-0001-0 ↗
48. Inspection and risk assessment of mechanically stabilized earth walls supporting bridge abutments10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001132 ↗
49. Myers, R.H., and Montgomery, D.C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, John Wiley and Sons. [2nd ed.].
50. Performance of three geogrid- reinforced soil walls before and after foundation failure10.1680/gein.15.00014 ↗
51. Experimental study on performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil model walls on rigid foundations subjected to static footing loading10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.001 ↗