journal article·2023-04-27Open access

Machine Learning Classification for a Second Opinion System in the Selection of Assistive Technology in Post-Stroke Patients

Joachim Rosiński, Piotr Kotlarz, Izabela Rojek, Dariusz Mikołajewski

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

It is increasingly important to provide post-stroke patients with rapid access to patient-tailored assistive technologies to increase independence, mobility, and participation. Automating the selection of assistive devices based on artificial intelligence could speed up the process and improve accuracy. It would also relieve the burden on diagnosticians and therapists and speed up the introduction of new ranges by automating databases. This article compares selected machine learning classification methods in the area of post-stroke rehabilitation device selection. The article covers the specifics of the selection, the choice of classification methods, and the identification of the best one, as well as the experimental part, the description of the results, the comparison process, and directions for further research. The novelty lies both in the topic, as the choice of classification method has an impact on the accuracy of classification in the selection of medical materials, and in the manner of the comprehensive approach. The possible contribution is of great scientific and clinical relevance, but above all, it has economic and social importance, enabling post-stroke individuals to return more quickly to the community, learning, and work, and relieving the burden on the health care system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland

Funding

Kazimierz Wielki University

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Incidence, Implications, and Management of Seizures Following Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke10.1007/s11910-019-0957-4 ↗
2. Stroke Incidence by Sex Across the Lifespan10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032898 ↗
3. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 202210.1177/17474930211065917 ↗
4. Burden of Stroke in Europe: Thirty-Year Projections of Incidence, Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029606 ↗
5. Incidence & prevalence of stroke in India: A systematic review10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_516_15 ↗
6. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: A systematic review10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70025-0 ↗
7. Limited evidence of physical therapy on balance after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1371/journal.pone.0221700 ↗
8. Rozevink, S.G., Hijmans, J.M., Horstink, K.A., and van der Sluis, C.K. (2021). Effectiveness of task-specific training using assistive devices and task-specific usual care on upper limb performance after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., 1–14.10.1080/17483107.2021.2001061 ↗
9. User perspectives on the future of mobility assistive devices: Understanding users’ assistive device experiences and needs
10. Assistive technologies in stroke rehabilitation from a user perspective10.1111/j.1471-6712.1996.tb00315.x ↗
11. Mapping upper-limb motor performance after stroke—A novel method with utility for individualized motor training10.1186/s12984-017-0335-x ↗
12. Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke
13. Optimization of machine learning method combined with brain-computer interface rehabilitation system10.1589/jpts.34.379 ↗
14. Learning to teleoperate an upper-limb assistive humanoid robot for bimanual daily-living tasks10.1088/2057-1976/ac3881 ↗
15. Research progress on intelligent assessment system for upper limb function of stroke patients
16. Tactile Signatures and Hand Motion Intent Recognition for Wearable Assistive Devices10.3389/frobt.2019.00124 ↗
17. A novel adaptive, real-time algorithm to detect gait events from wearable sensors10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2337914 ↗
18. Real-time gait event detection using wearable sensors10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.128 ↗
19. Schwarz, A., Al-Haj Husain, A., Einaudi, L., Thürlimann, E., Läderach, J., Awai Easthope, C., Held, J.P.O., and Luft, A.R. (2023). Reliability and Validity of a Wearable Sensing System and Online Gait Analysis Report in Persons after Stroke. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23020624 ↗
20. Review-Emerging Portable Technologies for Gait Analysis in Neurological Disorders10.3389/fnhum.2022.768575 ↗
21. Calibration-Free Gait Assessment by Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors10.3389/fdgth.2021.736418 ↗
22. Early-stage pilot study on using fractional-order calculus-based filtering for the purpose of analysis of electroencephalography signals10.1515/slgr-2016-0049 ↗
23. Browarska, N., Kawala-Sterniuk, A., Zygarlicki, J., Martinek, R., and Gorzelańczyk, E.J. (2021). Comparison of smoothing filters’ influence on quality of data recorded with the emotiv epoc flex brain–computer interface headset during audio stimulation. Brain Sci., 11.10.3390/brainsci11010098 ↗
24. Shifting spatial attention-Numerical model of Posner experiment10.1016/j.neucom.2013.12.043 ↗
25. Lee, P., Chen, T.B., Liu, C.H., Wang, C.Y., Huang, G.H., and Lu, N.H. (2022). Identifying the Posture of Young Adults in Walking Videos by Using a Fusion Artificial Intelligent Method. Biosensors, 12.10.3390/bios12050295 ↗
26. Chan, H.L., Ouyang, Y., Chen, R.S., Lai, Y.H., Kuo, C.C., Liao, G.S., Hsu, W.Y., and Chang, Y.J. (2023). Deep Neural Network for the Detections of Fall and Physical Activities Using Foot Pressures and Inertial Sensing. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23010495 ↗
27. Residual attention based uncertainty-guided mean teacher model for semi-supervised breast masses segmentation in 2D ultrasonography10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102173 ↗
28. Towards better interpretable and generalizable AD detection using collective artificial intelligence10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102171 ↗
29. Comparison of different types of neuronal nets for failures location within water-supply networks
30. Slemenšek, J., Fister, I., Geršak, J., Bratina, B., van Midden, V.M., Pirtošek, Z., and Šafarič, R. (2023). Human Gait Activity Recognition Machine Learning Methods. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23020745 ↗
31. Burduk, R., Rojek, I., Mikołajewska, E., and Mikołajewski, D. (2022). Post-Stroke Gait Classification Based on Feature Space Transformation and Data Labeling. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211346 ↗
32. Junaid, S.B., Imam, A.A., Shuaibu, A.N., Basri, S., Kumar, G., Surakat, Y.A., Balogun, A.O., Abdulkarim, M., Garba, A., and Sahalu, Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Sensors and Vital Health Signs: A Review. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211475 ↗
33. Rojek, I., Kozielski, M., Dorożyński, J., and Mikołajewski, D. (2022). AI-Based Prediction of Myocardial Infarction Risk as an Element of Preventive Medicine. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199596 ↗
34. Neural Networks as Prediction Models for Water Intake in Water Supply System
35. Ecodesign of technological processes with the use of decision trees method
36. Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., and Jurczyk, M. (2018). Advances in Manufacturing, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6 ↗
37. Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024293 ↗
38. Machine Learning in Action: Stroke Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction10.3389/fneur.2021.734345 ↗
39. Interpretable Machine Learning Modeling for Ischemic Stroke Outcome Prediction10.3389/fneur.2022.884693 ↗
40. Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Web-Based Upper Limb Home Rehabilitation System Using a Smartwatch and Machine Learning Model for Chronic Stroke Survivors: Prospective Comparative Study10.2196/17216 ↗
41. Machine Learning for 3D Kinematic Analysis of Movements in Neurorehabilitation10.1007/s11910-020-01049-z ↗
42. Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4 ↗
43. Machine Learning Methods Predict Individual Upper-Limb Motor Impairment Following Therapy in Chronic Stroke10.1177/1545968320909796 ↗
44. Predicting clinically significant motor function improvement after contemporary task-oriented interventions using machine learning approaches10.1186/s12984-020-00758-3 ↗
45. Jung, H.-T., Kim, H., Oh, M.Y., Ryu, T., and Kim, Y. (2017, January 11–15). Learning classifier to evaluate movement quality in unassisted pick-and-place exercises for post-stroke patients: A preliminary study. Proceedings of the 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea.10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037362 ↗
46. Fuzzy system as an assessment tool for analysis of the health-related quality of life for the people after stroke10.1007/978-3-319-59063-9_64 ↗