Active Disturbance Rejection Optimization Control for SOFCs in Offshore Wind Power
Source abstract
Abstract
With the development of offshore wind power (OWP)-based hydrogen production technology, hydrogen fuel cells play a critical role in buffering the mismatch between energy supply and demand in OWP systems. Benefitting from high efficiency, cleanliness, and nontoxicity, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) have been extensively investigated. However, OWP-based SOFC systems are characterized by strong nonlinearity and uncertainty and are vulnerable to disturbance, which leads to appreciable fluctuations and even instability to the system output voltage. Since conventional PID control schemes cannot achieve favorable performance, a more advanced control method is imperative. In response, this paper proposes a linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) method to reduce the influence of disturbance and ensure the stability of SOFC systems. In addition, an improved firefly algorithm (IFA) was adopted to optimize LADRC parameters. A step inertia weight was introduced, and a random generation mechanism was adopted to replace 30% of individuals with low luminous degrees. Using optimized LADRC parameters, a series of Monte Carlo experiments were carried out to verify the system’s robustness. The experimental results show that the overshoot of the LADRC method optimized by the IFA can be reduced by 5.7% compared with the traditional PID controller, i.e., the influence of the voltage disturbance can be well suppressed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China
Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
Funding
Technology Project of Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Multi-objective design optimization of combined cooling, heating and power system for cruise ship application10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.047 ↗
2. Hydrogen production from the Wind Float Atlantic offshore wind farm: A techno-economic analysis10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118481 ↗
3. Kaiser, S., Siems, F., Mostert, C., and Bringezu, S. (2022). Environmental and Economic Performance of CO2-Based Methanol Production Using Long-Distance Transport for H2 in Combination with CO2 Point Sources: A Case Study for Germany. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15072507 ↗
4. Economic and technological feasibility of using power-to-hydrogen technology under higher wind penetration in China10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.015 ↗
5. Hydrogen production from offshore wind power in South China10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.162 ↗
6. Kuterbekov, K.A., Nikonov, A.V., Bekmyrza, K.Z., Pavzderin, N.B., Kabyshev, A.M., Kubenova, M.M., Kabdrakhimova, G.D., and Aidarbekov, N. (2022). Classification of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials, 12.10.3390/nano12071059 ↗
7. Solid oxide fuel cell: Decade of progress, future perspectives and challenges10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.020 ↗
8. Energy and exergy analyses of solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid systems fed by different renewable biofuels: A comparative study10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124383 ↗
9. Feedforward-decoupled closed-loop fuzzy proportion-integral-derivative control of air supply system of proton exchange membrane fuel cell10.1016/j.energy.2021.122490 ↗
10. Tyczka, M., and Skarka, W. (2016). Transdisciplinary Engineering: Crossing Boundaries, IOS Press.
11. Temperature and hydrogen flow rate controls of diesel autothermal reformer for 3.6 kW PEM fuel cell system with autoignition delay time analysis10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.208 ↗
12. Control of a solid oxide fuel cell stack based on unmodeled dynamic compensations10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.018 ↗
13. Li, H., Chen, H., Gao, N., T-Ahmed, N.A., Charpentier, J.F., and Benbouzid, M. (2022). Ship Dynamic Positioning Control Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10070865 ↗
14. Stability and performance comparison analysis for linear active disturbance rejection control–based system10.1177/01423312211065918 ↗
15. Active disturbance rejection control design for high-order integral systems10.1016/j.isatra.2021.06.038 ↗
16. Active disturbance rejection control strategy applied to cathode humidity control in PEMFC system10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113389 ↗
17. Robust adaptive control of interleaved boost converter for fuel cell application10.1109/TIA.2021.3113262 ↗
18. Improved firefly algorithm approach applied to chiller loading for energy conservation10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.030 ↗
19. Backstepping Supertwisting Control of Four-Phase Interleaved Boost Converter for PEM Fuel Cell10.1109/TPEL.2022.3149099 ↗
20. Parameter optimization of 5.5 GHz low noise amplifier using multi-objective Firefly Algorithm10.1007/s00542-018-4034-8 ↗
21. Eyni, E., Stanko, M., Schümann, H., and Qureshi, A.H. (2022). Dynamic Process Modeling of Topside Systems for Evaluating Power Consumption and Possibilities of Using Wind Power. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15249482 ↗
22. Techno-economic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation for green hydrogen production using offshore wind power plant10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115695 ↗
23. Comprehensive summary of solid oxide fuel cell control: A state-of-the-art review10.1186/s41601-022-00251-0 ↗
24. Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review
25. Solid oxide fuel cell system for automobiles10.1080/15435075.2022.2065454 ↗
26. Optimization and Control for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Hybrid DC Microgrids From the Perspective of High Efficiency, Thermal Safety, and Transient Response
27. An integrated SOFC plant dynamic model for power systems simulation10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00430-9 ↗
28. Parametric study of solid oxide fuel cell performance10.1016/j.enconman.2006.11.016 ↗
29. Hybrid multi-objective method based on ant colony optimization and firefly algorithm for renewable energy sources
30. QUAntum Particle Swarm Optimization: An auto-adaptive PSO for local and global optimization10.1007/s10589-022-00362-2 ↗
31. Behera, M., Sarangi, A., Mishra, D., Mallick, P.K., Shafi, J., Srinivasu, P.N., and Ljaz, M.F. (2022). Automatic Data Clustering by Hybrid Enhanced Firefly and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10193532 ↗
32. Qin, Y., Sun, L., Hua, Q., and Liu, P. (2018). A fuzzy adaptive PID controller design for fuel cell power plant. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10072438 ↗