Supporting Tech Founders—A Needs-Must Approach to the Delivery of Acceleration Programmes for a Post-Pandemic World
Source abstract
Abstract
Along with most economic sectors, the COVID-19 crisis has had a strong impact on start-up accelerators, forcing them to seek urgent and imaginative solutions to quickly adapt to a new environment. The enforced change brought challenges that have been exacerbated by the sudden slowdown in economic activity. Despite these difficulties, it has become clear that the accelerated digital transformation that emerged through a needs-must approach to engage with start-ups through remote means has also presented new opportunities for accelerators to improve their programmes. This article analyses the impact of the COVID crisis on the organisation and results obtained by a European accelerator, which delivers programmes for growth stage technology start-ups. For this purpose, two very similar programmes have been analysed and compared: one focused on industrial technologies (delivered in 2019–2020) and another one focused on products and services built on space technologies (2020–2021). The research has been undertaken using observational techniques, reinforced through the collection of primary and secondary data throughout the study duration. The result of the analysis point to a possible post-COVID accelerator model that blends online and remote delivery as a new way of improving the experience of start-ups and optimising the use of scarce resources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Economic and Technological Innovation · Firm Innovation and Growth
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
BluSpecs S.L., 28043 Madrid, Spain
Cloud Incubator HUB, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
Funding
European Commission
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. World Bank (2022). Global Economic Prospects, January 2022, World Bank. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36519.
2. Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing new organizational forms10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102110 ↗
3. COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro-and small-enterprises10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.035 ↗
4. Unlocking challenges and opportunities presented by COVID-19 pandemic for cross-cutting disruption in agri-food and green deal innovations: Quo Vadis?10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141362 ↗
5. Innovating under pressure: Adopting digital technologies in social care organizations during the COVID-19 crisis10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102536 ↗
6. Digital affordances and entrepreneurial dynamics: New evidence from European regions10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102442 ↗
7. COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011 ↗
8. International entrepreneurship in the post COVID world10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101143 ↗
9. Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives?10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120451 ↗
10. Teare, G., and Global Venture Funding and Unicorn Creation In 2021 Shattered All Records (2022, May 04). Technol. Available online: https://news.crunchbase.com/news/global-vc-funding-unicorns-2021-monthly-recap/.
11. How can accelerators in south America evolve to support start-ups in a post-COVID-19 world?10.35692/07183992.13.2.7 ↗
12. Threat or opportunity? A case study of digital-enabled redesign of entrepreneurship education in the COVID-19 emergency10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120565 ↗
13. Crises and entrepreneurial opportunities: Digital social innovation in response to physical distancing10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00222 ↗
14. The advantages and disadvantages of E-working: An examination using an ALDINE analysis10.28991/esj-2021-SPER-02 ↗
15. Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236 ↗
16. Open accelerators for start-ups success: A case study10.1108/EJIM-10-2015-0113 ↗
17. The design of startup accelerators10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003 ↗
18. Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem10.1002/sej.1281 ↗
19. Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003 ↗
20. Miller, P., Bound, K., and The Startup Factories (2023, February 22). NESTA. Available online: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/the-startup-factories/.
21. Cohen, S., and Hochberg, Y.V. (2014). Accelerating Start-ups: The Seed Accelerator Phenomenon. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.2418000 ↗
22. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., and Hove, J.V. (2016). Technology Entrepreneurship and Business Incubation: Theory, Practice, Lessons Learned, World Scientific.
23. Accelerators as authentic training experiences for nascent entrepreneurs10.1108/ET-01-2017-0007 ↗
24. Innovation accelerators: Defining characteristics among startup assistance organizations
25. Bone, J., Allen, O., and Haley, C. (2017). Business Incubators and Accelerators: The National Picture, Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. BEIS research paper no 7. UK.
26. Fehder, D.C., and Hochberg, Y.V. (2014). Accelerators and the Regional Supply of Venture Capital Investment. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.2518668 ↗
27. Heinemann, F. (2015). Corporate Accelerators: A Study on Prevalence, Sponsorship, and Strategy. [Master’s Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
28. Start-up accelerator: State of the art and future directions
29. Bryant, M. (2012). European Activities Specific to Web Entrepreneurs, EU. Report of EU.
30. Salido, E., Sabás, M., and Freixas, P. (2013). The Accelerator and Incubator Ecosystem in Europe, Telefónica Europe.
31. Rossetti, F., Nepelski, D., and Cardona, M. (2018). The Startup Europe Ecosystem. Analysis of the Startup Europe Projects and of Their Beneficiarie, EUR 29134 EN; Publications Office of the European Union.
32. Christiansen, J. (2023, February 22). The European Seed Accelerator Ecosystem. Available online: http://www.acceleratorassembly.eu/research.
33. Guttentag, M., Davidson, A., and Hume, V. (2022, August 25). Does the acceleration works?. Available online: https://www.galidata.org/publications/does-acceleration-work/.
34. Rusu, V., Roman, A., Tudose, M., and Cojocaru, O. (2022). An Empirical Investigation of the Link between Entrepreneurship Performance and Economic Development: The Case of EU Countries. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12146867 ↗
35. Chowdhury, F., and Bone, J. (2021). Resilience and Challenges of Business Accelerators and Incubators during the Pandemic in the UK, NESTA. Project Report.10.2139/ssrn.4034345 ↗
36. The coronavirus crisis in B2B settings: Crisis uniqueness and managerial implications based on social exchange theory10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.004 ↗
37. Gavriluță, N., Grecu, S.P., and Chiriac, H.C. (2022). Sustainability and employability in the time of COVID-19. Youth, education and entrepreneurship in EU countries. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14031589 ↗
38. McIver-Harris, K., and Tatum, A. (2020, January 13). Measuring incubator success during a global pandemic: A rapid evidence assessment. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship, Cleveland, OH, USA.10.2139/ssrn.3687712 ↗
39. Basnayake, H., Mack, C., Cui, M., Peters, G., Koo, A., Zhou, J., Tong, I., Saretzki, D., and Toh, A. (2020). How Companies Can Reshape Results and Plan for a COVID-19 Recovery, Ernst & Young Global Limited.
40. Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791 ↗
41. Cruz, D.P.C.R. (2021). Should Accelerators Move to an Online Model?. [Master’s Dissertation, Universidade Catolica Portugesa]. Available onlinehttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/35223.
42. Kuckertz, A., Brändle, L., Gaudig, A., Hinderer, S., Reyes, C.A.M., Prochotta, A., Steinbrink, K., and Berger, E.S. (2020). Startups in times of crisis-A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, 13.10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169 ↗
43. Järvi, A., Mäkilä, T., and Hyrynsalmi, S. (2013). Game Development Accelerator-Initial Design and Research Approach, IW-LCSP@ ICSOB.
44. Kovalainen, A., and Eriksson, P. (2015). Qualitative Methods in Business Research, SAGE Publications Ltd.
45. Hesse-Biber, S.N., and Leavy, P. (2016). The Practice of Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications Ltd.
46. Levene, H. (1960). Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, Stanford University Press.
47. On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other10.1214/aoms/1177730491 ↗
48. Sekaran, U., and Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, John Wiley & Sons.
49. Facial appearance dissatisfaction explains differences in Zoom fatigue10.1089/cyber.2021.0112 ↗