An Agent-Based Simulation of How Promotion Biases Impact Corporate Gender Diversity
Source abstract
Abstract
Diversity and inclusion (D&I) is a topic of increasing relevance across virtually all sectors of our society, with the potential for a significant impact on corporations and more broadly on our economy and society. While people are typically the most valuable asset of every organization, human resources (HR) in general, and D&I in particular, are dominated by qualitative approaches. This paper introduces an agent-based simulation that can quantify the impact of certain aspects of D&I on corporate performance. The simulation provides a parsimonious and compelling explanation of the impact of hiring and promotion biases on the resulting corporate gender balance, accurately replicating real-world data about gender imbalances across multiple industry sectors. In addition, the paper shows that the simulation can be used to predict the likely impact of different D&I interventions. Specifically, once a company has become imbalanced, even removing all promotion biases is not sufficient to rectify the situation, and it can take decades to undo the imbalances initially created by these biases. These and other results demonstrate that agent-based simulation is a powerful approach for managing D&I in corporate settings and could become an invaluable tool for the strategic and tactical management of human resources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gender Diversity and Inequality · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aleria PBC, 101 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10013, USA
Aleria Research Corp, 132 W 31st Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation10.1002/smj.1955 ↗
2. Do female executives make a difference? The impact of female leadership on gender gaps and firm performance10.1093/ej/uez012 ↗
3. Hunt, V., Yee, L., Prince, S., and Dixon-Fyle, S. (2023, February 07). Delivering through Diversity. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity.
4. A note on the gender wage gap among managerial positions using a counterfactual decomposition approach: Sticky floor or glass ceiling?10.1080/13504851.2010.518944 ↗
5. The Gender Pay Gap: Have Women Gone as Far as They Can?10.5465/amp.2007.24286161 ↗
6. The Effects of Executive, Firm, and Board Characteristics on Executive Exit10.1111/fire.12106 ↗
7. Gender Discrimination and Job-Related Outcomes: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Working Women in the United States and China10.1006/jvbe.1999.1748 ↗
8. Hirsh, E. (2023, February 02). Do Lawsuits Improve Gender and Racial Equality at Work?. Available online: https://hbr.org/2019/11/do-lawsuits-improve-gender-and-racial-equality-at-work.
9. For Law and Markets: Employment Discrimination Lawsuits, Market Performance, and Managerial Diversity10.1086/694887 ↗
10. Academe′s Glass Ceiling: Societal, Professional-Organizational, and Institutional Barriers to the Career Advancement of Academic Women10.1086/447631 ↗
11. Promotions and Earnings—Gender or Merit? Evidence from Longitudinal Personnel Data10.1007/s12122-017-9254-7 ↗
12. Woetzel, J., Madgavkar, A., Ellingrud, K., Labaye, E., Devillard, S., Kutcher, E., Manyika, J., Dobbs, R., and Krishnan, M. (2023, February 02). The Power of Parity: How Advancing Women′s Equality can Add $12 Trillion to Global Growth. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/how-advancing-womens-equality-can-add-12-trillion-to-global-growth.
13. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems10.1073/pnas.082080899 ↗
14. Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Simon and Schuster.10.1063/1.2809917 ↗
15. Gaudiano, P. (2023, February 02). The Best Approach to Decision Making Combines Data and Managers Expertise. Available online: https://hbr.org/2017/06/the-best-approach-to-decision-making-combines-data-and-managers-expertise.
16. Mapping the knowledge frontiers and evolution of decision making based on agent-based modeling10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108982 ↗
17. North, M.J., and Macal, C.M. (2007). Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation, Oxford University Press.
18. Garagic, D., Trifonov, I., Gaudiano, P., and Dickason, D. (2007, January 9–12). An agent-based modeling approach for studying manpower and personnel management behaviors. Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
19. Gaudiano, P., and Hunt, E. (2023, February 02). Equal Opportunity or Affirmative Action? A Computer Program Shows Which Is Better for Diversity. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/gaudianohunt/2016/08/22/equal-opportunity-or-affirmative-action-a-computer-program-shows-which-is-better-for-diversity/.
20. An agent based modeling approach in the strategic human resource Management, including endogenous and exogenous factors10.1016/j.simpat.2018.07.008 ↗
21. (2023, February 02). Gender Equity in the Workplace Report; Linkedin. Available online: https://linkedin.github.io/gender-equity-2022/.
22. Hinchliffe, E. (2023, February 02). Women CEOs Run More Than 10% of Fortune 500 Companies for the First Time in History. Available online: https://fortune.com/2023/01/12/fortune-500-companies-ceos-women-10-percent/.
23. Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination10.1086/228350 ↗
24. Chipping away at the Glass Ceiling: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership10.1257/aer.101.3.635 ↗
25. Sex Discrimination in the Promotion Process10.1177/001979398303600407 ↗
26. “Opting Out” or “Pushed Out”? Integrating Perspectives on Women’s Career Equality for Gender Inclusion and Interventions
27. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067 ↗
28. The existence of gender-specific promotion standards in the U.S10.1002/mde.1097 ↗
29. When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777 ↗
30. An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to womens promotion?10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003 ↗
31. Krivkovich, A., Nadeau, M.-C., Robinson, K., Robinson, N., Starikova, I., and Yee, L. (2023, February 02). Women in the Workplace. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace.
32. Agent-based modeling in managerial science: An illustrative survey and study10.1007/s11846-014-0139-3 ↗
33. Models of Segregation
34. Epstein, J.M., and Axtell, R. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up, Brookings Institution Press.10.7551/mitpress/3374.001.0001 ↗
35. Agent-based simulation models in organization science10.1177/1094428112470006 ↗
36. Page, S. (2017). The Diversity Bonus, Princeton University Press.
37. Agent-Based Models of Gender Inequalities in Career Progression10.18564/jasss.3738 ↗
38. Takács, K., Squazzoni, F., and Bravo, G. (2012, January 20). The network antidote: An agent-based model of discrimination in labor markets. Proceedings of the MKE 2012 Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
39. Simulating gender stratification
40. Zhang, C., and Gaudiano, P. (2019, January 25–26). An agent-based simulation of corporate gender biases. Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1007/978-3-030-32520-6_9 ↗
41. Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies10.1177/000312240607100404 ↗
42. Duzevik, D., Anev, A., Funes, P., and Gaudiano, P. (2007). 2007 Word of Mouth Research Symposium, Icosystem Corporation. Available online: http://www.icosystem.com/the-effects-of-word-of-mouth-an-agent-based-simulation-of-interpersonal-influence-in-social-networks/.
43. Gaudiano, P. (2023, February 02). Understanding Attribution from the Inside Out. Available online: https://www.exchangewire.com/blog/2016/05/16/understanding-attribution-from-the-inside-out/.
44. Agent-based simulation as a tool for the built environment10.1111/nyas.12162 ↗
45. Gaudiano, P., Bandte, O., Duzevik, D., and Anev, D. (, 2007). How word-of-mouth impacts medicare product launch and product design. Proceedings of the Word of Mouth Marketing Summit (WOMMA’07), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
46. Shargel, B., Bonabeau, E., Budynek, J., and Gaudiano, P. (2005). An Evolutionary, Agent-Based Model to Aid in Computer Intrusion Detection and Prevention, Icosystem Corp.10.21236/ADA464183 ↗
47. Wilensky, U., and Rand, W. (2015). An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo, MIT Press.
48. Seniority versus ability in promotion decisions10.1177/001979398503800308 ↗
49. Andre, L. (2023, February 02). Employee Turnover Statistics: 2023 Causes, Cost & Prevention Data. Available online: https://financesonline.com/employee-turnover-statistics/.
50. Thriving or surviving at work: How workplace learning opportunities and subjective career success are connected with job satisfaction and turnover intention?10.1108/JWL-12-2020-0184 ↗
51. Unraveling the mysteries of gender differences in intentions to leave the organization10.1002/job.4030130504 ↗
52. Mercer (2023, February 02). North American Employee Turnover: Trends and Effects. Available online: https://www.imercer.com/articleinsights/north-american-employee.
53. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2019). Why Do So Many Incompetent Men Become Leaders? (And How to Fix It), Harvard Business Review Press.
54. Oluo, I. (2020). Mediocre: The Dangerous Legacy of White Male America, Seal Press.
55. The effectiveness of a diversity awareness training programme10.4102/sajip.v28i3.68 ↗
56. Dobbin, F., and Kalev, A. (2022). Getting to Diversity: What Works and What Doesn’t, Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674290051 ↗
57. Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes10.1037/a0037908 ↗
58. Gender inequalities in the workplace: The effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400 ↗
59. Shocks as causes of turnover: What they are and how organizations can manage them10.1002/hrm.20074 ↗
60. Banaji, M.R., Bazerman, M.H., and Chugh, D. (2003). How (Un)ethical Are You?. Harv. Bus. Rev., 81, Available online: https://hbr.org/2003/12/how-unethical-are-you.
61. An agent-based approach for modeling and simulation of human resource management as a complex system: Management strategy evaluation10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102118 ↗
62. Newkirk, P. (2019). Diversity, Inc.: The Failed Promise of a Billion-Dollar Business, Bold Type Books.
63. Naghdi Tam, A. (2017). Agent-Based Simulation as a Tool for Examining the Impact of a Company’s Reputation on Attracting Diverse Talent. [Master’s Thesis, City College of New York].