journal article·2023-01-12Open access

Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections

Alexander Stuckert, Tran Quoc Khanh

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

This work intends to define the resolution requirements for near-field projections in a psycho-physical study design to evaluate the participants’ perception under the influence of different ambient lighting levels and various viewing distances. The variation in ambient lighting and viewing distances relates to various daytime and critical distances in urban environments. The application of near-field projections increases the popularity of communication- or safety-relevant projections, such as for automated vehicles. However, previous studies in the filming industry have shown that the resolution requirements differ depending on the application. In this work, a field study design presents an experimental approach to define a perceived resolution on the street surface in the near field around the vehicle. Furthermore, the study evaluates the influence of viewing distance, ambient lighting and projection content on the perceived resolution in detail. The results reveal a significant dependency on ambient lighting (p < 0.05). Furthermore, this work states that the symbol-based projection has lower resolution requirements, e.g., a viewing distance of 1 m and 3 m results in a 2 pixels per degree resolution compared to the text-based projection in the parking garage scenario. Nevertheless, in the dusk/dawn scenario, the perceived resolution can be grouped for viewing distances above 1 m for content-independent projections.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Visual perception and processing mechanisms · Impact of Light on Environment and Health · Color Science and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Adaptive Lighting Systems and Visual Processing, Technical University of Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 4a, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany

BMW Group, Knorrstr. 148, 80788 Munich, Germany

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Bremer, C., Noell, W., Quaranta, G., and Völkel, R. (2022, January 4–6). Demanding requirements for interior projection met by micro-optical solutions. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
2. High-resolution headlamps—Technology analysis and system design10.1515/aot-2018-0060 ↗
3. Moisel, J. (2015, January 28–30). Requirements for Future High Resolution Adb Modules. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
4. Namyslo, S., Courcier, M., and Moisy, E. (2022, January 4–6). 360° Near Field Projection—Enhanced safety or just a nice gadget?. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
5. Pulliam, J. (2022, January 4–6). Investigating Symbol Recognition Time as a Function of System Resolution. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
6. Pulliam, J., and Dabral, S. (2022, January 4–6). Innovative Application of Phase Light Modulation for Energy Efficient Projection in Automotive Use-Cases. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
7. Survey of on-road image projection with pixel light systems
8. Schlöder, U. (2022, January 4–6). Dynamic Ground Projections around the Car: The Headlamp as Integrator. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
9. Seiser, B. (2020, June 22). Dynamic Ground Projection Using DLP® Technology for Automotive Exterior Lighting. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/wp/slyy187/slyy187.pdf?ts=1657029920770&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252F.
10. Stuckert, A., Singer, T., and Khanh, T.Q. (2022, January 4–6). Analysis and definition of resolution requirements for projections in the near field of a vehicle. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
11. Suwa, M., Nishimura, M., and Sakata, R. (2017, January 12–14). LED Projection Module Enables a Vehicle to Communicate with Pedestrians and Other Vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ICCE.2017.7889220 ↗
12. Viršek, M. (2022, January 4–6). Automotive car-body lighting digital projector based on LCoS technology. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting, Darmstadt, Germany.
13. Lowe, A.C., and Kriss, M.A. (2008). Projection Displays, John and Wiley and Sons.
14. Guenther, B., and Steel, D. (2018). Projection displays—LCD/MEMS/LCoS based. Encyclopedia of Modern Optics, Elsevier Ltd.
15. Compact LED projector design with high uniformity and efficiency10.1364/AO.53.00H227 ↗
16. An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles?10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.002 ↗
17. Dietrich, A., Willrodt, J.-H., Wagner, K., and Bengler, K. (2018, January 5–7). Projection-based external human-machine interfaces—Enabling interaction between automated vehicles and pedestrian. Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference Europe, Antibes, France.
18. Nguyen, T.T., Holländer, K., Hoggenmueller, M., Parker, C., and Tomitsch, M. (2019, January 21–25). Designing for Projection-based Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Utrecht, The Netherlands.10.1145/3342197.3344543 ↗
19. Shibata, Y. (2019, January 23–25). Requirement Performance of Road Projection Lamp in Conjuction with Turn Signal Lamp. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Automative Lighting (ISAL), Darmstadt, Germany.
20. Simple visual reaction time: Sex and age differences10.1080/87565648709540372 ↗
21. Age related changes in visual acuity10.1016/0531-5565(86)90047-1 ↗
22. Spatial vision in older adults: Perceptual changes and neural bases10.1111/opo.12565 ↗
23. Recent Changes in the Age Composition of Drivers in 15 Countries10.1080/15389588.2011.638016 ↗
24. The effects of picture size and definition on perceived image quality10.1109/16.34260 ↗
25. Relationship between visual acuity and observation distance10.1046/j.1475-1313.1995.9592788.x ↗
26. The relation between picture size, viewing distance and picture quality10.1049/pi-b-1.1958.0320 ↗
27. Influence of Video Image Size and Resolution on Viewing-Distance Preferences10.5594/J15915 ↗
28. The Relation between Visual Acuity and Illumination
29. (2013). Lettering—Legibility (Standard No. DIN 1450:2013-04).
30. (2012). Graphical Symbols—Safety Colours and Safety Signs—Part 1: Design Principles for Safety Signs and Safety Markings (Standard No. DIN ISO 3864-1:2012-06).
31. (2014). Light and Lighting—Lighting of Work Places—Part 2: Outdoor Work Places (Standard No. DIN EN 12464-2:2014-05, 20).
32. MAXWELL (2020, October 07). MP-WU5603 Laser Projector. Available online: https://maxellproav.com/product/mp-wu5603-laser-projector/.
33. Kingdom, F.A.A., and Prins, N. (2016). Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction: Second Edition. Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-407156-8.00001-3 ↗
34. Statistisches Bundesamt (2020, August 27). Mikrozensus—Fragen zur Gesundheit—Körpermaße der Bevölkerung 2017. Available online: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Gesundheitszustand-Relevantes-Verhalten/Publikationen/Downloads-Gesundheitszustand/koerpermasse-5239003179004.html.
35. (2001). Road Surface and Road Marking Reflection Characteristics, Commission Internationale de L’eclairage, Technical Report, Vienna (Standard No. CIE 144:2001).
36. Valberg, A. (2005). Light Vision Color, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
37. Cogent (2020, November 09). Cogent 2000 (1.33). The Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience. Available online: http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/cogent_2000.php.
38. Teubner, B.G. (2003). Systemtheorie der Visuellen Wahrnehmung, Springer.
39. Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure10.3758/BF03194546 ↗
40. Macmillan, N.A., and Creelman, C.D. (2004). Detection Theory: A User’s Guide, Psychology Press. [2nd ed.].10.4324/9781410611147 ↗
41. Efficient estimation of sensroy thresholds with ML-PEST10.1163/156856897X00159 ↗
42. Field, A., Miles, J., and Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Choice Reviews Online, SAGE.
43. Ellis, P.D. (2010). The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results, Cambridge University Press. [1st ed.].10.1017/CBO9780511761676 ↗
44. Scientists rise up against statistical significance10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9 ↗
45. Gaul, M. (2022, December 28). Bicycle: It Depends on the Braking Power. DEKRA Solutions. Available online: https://www.dekra-solutions.com/2020/12/bicycle-it-depends-on-the-braking-power/?lang=en.
46. Visual requirement for Chinese reading with normal vision10.1002/brb3.1216 ↗