journal article·2022-12-12Open access

Rhamnolipids Mediate the Effects of a Gastropod Grazer in Regards to Carbon–Nitrogen Stoichiometry of Intertidal Microbial Biofilms

Stephanie P. Gill, Louise Kregting, Ibrahim M. Banat, Joerg Arnscheidt, William R. Hunter

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 24

Abstract

Microbial biofilms have co-evolved with grazing animals, such as gastropods, to develop mutually beneficial relationships. Although microbial biofilms demonstrate resilience and resistance to chemical exposure, pre-existing relationships can be negatively affected by chemical input. In this study, we determined how the grazer, Littorina littorea (common periwinkle sea snail), and a biological surfactant (rhamnolipid) interact on a phototrophic marine biofilm. Biofilms were cultured in 32 twenty-liter buckets at the Queen’s University Marine Laboratory in Portaferry, Northern Ireland on clay tiles that were either exposed to 150 ppm of a rhamnolipid solution or that had no chemical exposure. L. littorea were added into half of the buckets, and biofilms were developed over 14 days. Biofilms exposed to grazing alone demonstrated high tolerance to the disturbance, while those growing on rhamnolipid-exposed substrate demonstrated resistance but experienced slight declines in carbon and stoichiometric ratios. However, when exposed to both, biofilms had significant decreases in stoichiometry and declined in productivity and respiration. This is problematic, as continuing marine pollution increases the likelihood that biofilms will be exposed to combinations of stressors and disturbances. Loss of biofilm productivity within these areas could lead to the loss of an important food source and nutrient cycler within the marine ecosystem.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Marine Biology and Ecology Research · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK

School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK

School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK

Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK

Funding

University of Ulster · Agri Food and Biosciences Institute · Queen’s University Belfast

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Microbial surface colonization and biofilm development in marine environments10.1128/MMBR.00037-15 ↗
2. Biofilms: An emergent form of bacterial life10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94 ↗
3. The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms10.1038/nrmicro.2016.15 ↗
4. Influences of anthropogenic land use on microbial community structure and functional potentials of stream benthic biofilms10.1038/s41598-017-15624-x ↗
5. Biofilm structure and function and possible implications for riverine DOC dynamics
6. CO₂ Production as an indicator of biofilm metabolism10.1128/AEM.01567-08 ↗
7. Marine biofilms on artificial surfaces: Structure and dynamics10.1111/1462-2920.12186 ↗
8. The response of diatom central carbon metabolism to nitrogen starvation is different from that of green algae and higher plants10.1104/pp.111.184333 ↗
9. Relative toxicity of the components of the original formulation of Roundup® to five North American anurans10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.11.025 ↗
10. Diatom-bacteria interactions modulate the composition and productivity of benthic diatom biofilms10.3389/fmicb.2019.01255 ↗
11. Jacobs, P., Pitarch, J., Kromkamp, J.C., and Philippart, C.J. (2021). Assessing biomass and primary production of microphytobenthos in depositional coastal systems using spectral information. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1101/2021.01.13.426519 ↗
12. Multicellular and unicellular responses of microbial biofilms to stress10.1515/hsz-2020-0213 ↗
13. The EPS matrix: The “house of biofilm cells”10.1128/JB.00858-07 ↗
14. Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection10.1128/aem.60.12.4339-4344.1994 ↗
15. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2 ↗
16. Innovative strategies toward the disassembly of the EPS matrix in bacterial biofilms10.3389/fmicb.2020.00952 ↗
17. Extracellular polymeric substances, a key element in understanding biofilm phenotype10.3934/microbiol.2018.2.274 ↗
18. Biofilm formation protects Escherichia coli against killing by Caenorhabditis elegans and Myxococcus xanthus10.1128/AEM.02464-14 ↗
19. Bacterial predation transforms the landscape and community assembly of biofilms10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.036 ↗
20. Biofilm matrix disrupts nematode motility and predatory behavior10.1038/s41396-020-00779-9 ↗
21. The importance of terrestrial subsidies in stream food webs varies along a stream size gradient10.1111/oik.02713 ↗
22. Words as battle cries: Symbiogenesis and the new field of endocytobiology10.2307/1311435 ↗
23. Past and present grazing boosts the photo-autotrophic biomass of biofilms10.3354/meps08481 ↗
24. Fortuitous insights into the ecology of a recently charted deep-sea hydrothermal vent, using snails’ feet10.1016/j.dsr.2020.103358 ↗
25. Tadpoles enhance microbial activity and leaf decomposition in a neotropical headwater stream10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02853.x ↗
26. Filter-feeders have differential bottom-up impacts on green and brown food webs10.1007/s00442-020-04821-7 ↗
27. Multiple roles of biosurfactants in structural biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa10.1128/JB.01515-06 ↗
28. Why do microorganisms produce rhamnolipids?10.1007/s11274-011-0854-8 ↗
29. Schmitz, K.S. (2018). Chapter 4: Life Science. Physical Chemistry, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-800513-2.00004-8 ↗
30. Milovanovic, M., Arsenijevic, A., Milovanovic, J., Kanjevac, T., and Arsenijevic, N. (2017). Chapter 14: Nanoparticles in Antiviral Therapy. Antimicrobial Nanoarchitectonics, Elsevier Inc.10.1016/B978-0-323-52733-0.00014-8 ↗
31. Rhamnolipid the glycolipid biosurfactant: Emerging trends and promising strategies in the field of biotechnology and biomedicine10.1186/s12934-020-01497-9 ↗
32. Chemical contaminants entering the marine environment from sea-based sources: A review with a focus on European seas10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.091 ↗
33. Grime, J.P. (1988). The CSR model of primary plant strategies—Origins, implications and tests. Plant Evolutionary Biology, Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-1207-6_14 ↗
34. Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change10.1038/s41396-019-0510-0 ↗
35. Editorial: Progress in ecological stoichiometry10.3389/fmicb.2018.01957 ↗
36. R Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
37. Fox, J., and Weisberg, S. (2018). An R Companion to Applied Regression, Sage Publications.10.32614/CRAN.package.carData ↗
38. Wickham, H. (2016). Package ‘ggplot2′: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9 ↗
39. Ogle, D.H., Doll, J.C., Wheeler, P., and Dinno, A. (2022). FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis, R Package Version 0.9.
40. Sodium dodecyl sulfate allows the persistence and recovery of biofilms of Pseudomonas fluorescens formed under different hydrodynamic conditions10.1080/08927010701730311 ↗
41. Detection of respiration changes inside biofilms with microelectrodes during exposure to antibiotics10.1080/10934529.2018.1544782 ↗
42. A comparison of effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics and biosurfactants on established bacterial biofilms10.1007/s00284-013-0412-8 ↗
43. Grazing resistance of bacterial biofilms: A matter of predators’ feeding trait10.1093/femsec/fix112 ↗
44. Intertidal biofilms on rocky substratum can play a major role in estuarine carbon and nutrient dynamics10.3354/meps258275 ↗
45. Effects of duration, frequency, and severity of the non-flow period on stream biofilm metabolism10.1007/s10021-019-00345-1 ↗
46. Synthetic and biological surfactant effects on freshwater biofilm community composition and metabolic activity10.1007/s00253-022-12179-4 ↗
47. Physical stress and biological control regulate the producer–consumer balance in intertidal biofilms10.1890/03-0279 ↗
48. Subtidal microphytobenthos: A secret garden stimulated by the engineer species Crepidula fornicata10.3389/fmars.2018.00475 ↗
49. Effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habitats of different productivity10.4319/lo.2001.46.8.1881 ↗
50. Shell biofilm-associated nitrous oxide production in marine molluscs: Processes, precursors and relative importance10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02823.x ↗
51. The involvement of rhamnolipids in microbial cell adhesion and biofilm development—An approach for control10.1111/lam.12211 ↗
52. EPS solubilization treatment by applying the biosurfactant rhamnolipid to reduce clogging in constructed wetlands10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.040 ↗
53. Ocean acidification and rising temperatures may increase biofilm primary productivity but decrease grazer consumption10.1098/rstb.2012.0438 ↗
54. Shifts in biofilms’ composition induced by flow stagnation, sewage contamination and grazing10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106006 ↗
55. Effects of atrazine on periphyton under grazing pressure10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00179-5 ↗
56. Urban stream microbial communities show resistance to pharmaceutical exposure10.1002/ecs2.2041 ↗