Removal of Intra-Array Statics in Seismic Arrays Due to Variable Topography and Positioning Errors
Source abstract
Abstract
A receiver array is an arrangement of geophones used to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of seismic data. However, deviations from ideal array conditions can lead to the non-optimal performance of the array. This study investigates, quantitatively, the array performance in the presence of topographic variations and positioning errors using 2D seismic data acquired in eastern Saudi Arabia. A receiver array was laid over a sand dune with variable topography underlain by a flat sabkha that has a very shallow water table. The topographic variations and position errors were calculated from Differential Global Positioning System (D-GPS) measurements of source and receiver positions and elevations. The errors in receiver positions, measured relative to the ideal receiver spacing, gave a mean and standard deviation of about 0.35% and 1%, respectively. On the other hand, elevation errors (topographic variations) from a horizontal datum gave a mean and standard deviation of about 25% and 13%, respectively. The ideal array response was found by removing both elevation and position errors. The first-arrival energy of the array was calculated after removal of elevation and position errors separately and compared to the ideal-array energy. Comparison showed a 64% enhancement in the first-arrival energy after correcting for elevation errors alone and almost no enhancement after correcting for position errors alone. The proposed approach can be used to calculate accurate static corrections for seismic reflection processing and to generate high-resolution subsurface images for engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Waves and Analysis · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · earthquake and tectonic studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geosciences, College of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
Technical Development Solutions for Water and Environment Company, Riyadh 11342, Saudi Arabia
Funding
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences (CPG)
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Statistically perturbed geophone array responses10.1190/1.1442590 ↗
2. Array seismology—Methods and applications10.1029/2000RG000100 ↗
3. Putting nuclear-test monitoring to the test10.1038/19000 ↗
4. Seismometer arrays—Their use in earthquake and test ban seismology10.1016/S0074-6142(02)80226-1 ↗
5. Tomographic imaging of the lowermost mantle with differential times of refracted and diffracted core phases (PKP, Pdiff)10.1029/2000JB900380 ↗
6. High-resolution and super stacking of time-reversal mirrors in locating seismic sources10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00957.x ↗
7. Cao, W., Schuster, G.T., Zhan, G., Hanafy, S.M., and Boonyasiriwat, C. (2008, January 9–14). Demonstration of super-resolution and super-stacking properties of time reversal mirrors in locating seismic sources. Proceedings of the 2008 SEG Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1190/1.3063972 ↗
8. Geotechnical parameters from seismic measurements: Two field examples from Egypt and Saudi Arabia10.2113/JEEG21.1.13 ↗
9. Seismic imaging of the Olduvai Basin, Tanzania10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109246 ↗
10. Comprehensive Geophysical study at Wabar crater, Rub Al-Khali desert, Saudi Arabia10.1029/2020EA001432 ↗
11. Oye, V., Dando, B., Wustefeld, A., Jerkins, A., and Koehler, A. (2021, January 15–18). Cost-effective Baseline Studies for Induced Seismicity Monitoring Related to CO2 Storage Site Preparation. Proceedings of the 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2139/ssrn.3819173 ↗
12. Near-surface imaging from traffic-induced surface waves with dense linear arrays: An application in the urban area of Hangzhou, China10.1190/geo2021-0184.1 ↗
13. Array signal processing on distributed acoustic sensing data: Directivity effects in slowness space10.1029/2021JB023587 ↗
14. A linear algorithm for ambient seismic noise double beamforming without explicit crosscorrelations10.1190/geo2019-0847.1 ↗
15. Yang, J., and Shragge, J. (September, January 28). Measuring seasonal velocity variations on an urban DAS array. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. Proceedings of the Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, Houston, TX, USA.
16. Hanafy, S.M. (2022). Land-Streamer vs. Conventional Seismic Data for High-Resolution Near-Surface Surveys. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020584 ↗
17. Assessing and Processing 3D Photogrammetry, Sedimentology and Geophysical Data to Build High-fidelity Reservoir Models Based on Carbonate Outcrop Analogs10.1306/05152221092 ↗
18. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis and statistical distribution of the Early Kimmeridgian Hanifa Formation stromatoporoid/coral buildups, central Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105934 ↗
19. Analyzing the effectiveness of receiver arrays for multicomponent seismic exploration10.1190/1.1527085 ↗
20. Inversion-based directional deconvolution to remove the effect of a geophone array on seismic signal10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.04.014 ↗
21. Noise analysis and multiple seismometer theory10.1190/1.1438235 ↗
22. Transient behavior of patterns10.1190/1.1438484 ↗
23. Patterns-with a pinch of salt10.1111/j.1365-2478.1973.tb00023.x ↗
24. Dudgeon, D.E., and Johnson, D.H. (1993). Array Signal Processing—Concepts and Techniques, Prentice-Hall Inc.
25. Gangi, A.F., and Benson, M.A. (1989). Wavelet response of seismic arrays. SEG Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.1889561 ↗
26. Al-Shuhail, A.A., and Gangi, A.F. (1994). The effect of topography on the wavelet response of the seismic arrays. SEG Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.1932032 ↗
27. Performance of seismic arrays in heterogeneous medium
28. Seismic array response in the presence of a dipping shallow layer10.1007/s11760-011-0234-8 ↗
29. Akram, J. (2007). Seismic Arrays Response in the Presence of Laterally Varying Thickness of the Weathering Layer. [Master’s Thesis, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals].10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.246.12 ↗
30. Performance of seismic arrays in the presence of weathering layer variations10.1007/s12517-016-2548-x ↗
31. Putra, R., and Al-Shuhail, A.A. (2018, January 5–8). Seismic Array Response in the Presence of Intra-Array Variations in Element Weights, Elevations, and Positions. Proceedings of the 13th Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition, Geo-2018, Manama, Bahrain.10.1306/42328Putra2018 ↗
32. Sheriff, R.E., and Geldart, L.P. (1995). Exploration Seismology, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].10.1017/CBO9781139168359 ↗
33. Schiller, J. (2013). Schaum’s Outline of Probability and Statistics, McGraw-Hill Education. [4th ed.].