The Effect of Bark Stripping by Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on Biometric Parameters of the Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)
Source abstract
Abstract
Bark stripping by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) is one of the most acute instances of damage wrought by these animals in a forest. Because of its location, bark stripping causes damage to the thickest and most valuable part of the tree trunk, which lowers the quality of the wood due to technical flaws. The research was conducted in 25 sampling sites of pine stands aged 35 years in a mixed, fresh forest habitat in south-western Poland. The study was aimed at assessing the influence of bark damage by deer on biometric parameters of pine stands (Pinus sylvestris L.). The assessment involved the diameter at breast height, height, basal area and volume of the tree stands. The results revealed a strong deer-specific pressure on the analysed pine stands. The share of bark stripped trees ranged from 65% to 96%. The number of bark damage instances (NBDI) on a given tree was found to significantly affect its diameter at breast height. The strip-damaged trees had breast height diameters lower by 23% on average, and their mean height was lower by 8.7% as compared with the trees without damage. The mean reduction in basal area increments (G1.3) of the trees was identified at 39%. In a similar way to the diameter at breast height and the basal area, the losses in tree stand volume growth caused by deer stripping were significant and oscillated at 41%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University of Opole, 45-052 Opole, Poland
Institute of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University of Opole, 45-035 Opole, Poland
Department of Technology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, 974 01 Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
Laboratory of Biopolymer and Derivatives, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Product, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
Funding
Cultural and Educational Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic · VEGA
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Nagy, L., Grabherr, G., Körner, C., and Thompson, D.B.A. (2003). Large herbivores in European Alpine ecosystems: Current status and challenges for the future. Alpine Biodiversity in Europe. Ecological Studies, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-18967-8 ↗
2. The management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00985.x ↗
3. Expanding ranges of wild and feral deer in Great Britain10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00060.x ↗
4. Temporal and spatial development of red deer harvesting in Europe: Biological and cultural factors10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01183.x ↗
5. ungulates density and crop damage in Hungary10.1007/s13364-012-0082-0 ↗
6. Synchrony in hunting bags: Reaction on climatic and human induced changes?10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.022 ↗
7. Heurich, M., Brand, T.T.G., Kaandorp, M.Y., Šustr, P., Müller, J., and Reineking, B. (2015). Country, cover or protection: What shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0120960 ↗
8. Opportunities and challenges with growing wildlife populations and zoonotic diseases in Sweden10.1007/s10344-015-0945-1 ↗
9. Overabundant ungulates in French Sologne? Increasing red deer and wild boar pressure may not threaten woodland birds in mature forest stands10.1016/j.baae.2016.04.005 ↗
10. Landscape effects on wild boar home range size under contrasting harvest regimes in a human-dominated agroecosystem10.1007/s10344-017-1090-9 ↗
11. Management of wild deer in Australia10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0837:MOWDIA]2.0.CO;2 ↗
12. Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer10.1071/WR07114 ↗
13. Effects of sika deer on vegetation in Japan: A review10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.011 ↗
14. Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats10.1046/j.1365-2907.1998.00031.x ↗
15. Probability of bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Austria10.14214/sf.316 ↗
16. Directional associational plant defense from Red deer (Cervus elaphus) foraging decisions10.1002/ecs2.1714 ↗
17. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer10.1093/forestry/65.2.145 ↗
18. Long-term changes of structure and tree species composition in Dinaric uneven-aged forests: Are red deer an important factor?10.1007/s10342-009-0325-z ↗
19. Wound occlusion and decay in Picea abies stems10.1007/s10342-011-0592-3 ↗
20. Modeling recent bark stripping by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in South Belgium coniferous stands10.1007/s13595-012-0253-9 ↗
21. Food of the red deer in an annual cycle10.4098/AT.arch.67-48 ↗
22. Van de Veen, H.E. (1979). Food Selection and Habitat Use in the Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.). [Ph.D. Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Gröningen Universiteit].
23. Damage of forests by game in the light of game management literature review
24. Haber, A. (1961). Forest Protection Against Game, PWRiL. (In Polish).
25. Attempts to divert bark-stripping by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) from standing to felled stems, to pruned spruce stems, in the neighboring stand and to pruned stems on forest aistes
26. Bark-stripping damage to Scots pine by red deer
27. Bark stripping damage by red deer in a Sitka spruce forest in western Scotland. I. Incidence10.1093/forestry/60.2.249 ↗
28. Analysis of causal factors behind cervid damage on the cluster pine in the Landes of Gascony [rubbing, bark stripping; food availibility]
29. Bark stripping by moose on young Pinus sylvestris in south–central Sweden10.1080/02827589609382939 ↗
30. Bark peeling frequency in the alpine provinces of Austria: The importance of forest structure and red deer management
31. Bark stripping of hinoki cypress by sika deer in relation to snow cover and food availability on Mt Takahara, central Japan10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00513.x ↗
32. Variations in bark-stripping by red deer Cervus elaphus across Europe10.1111/j.1365-2907.2006.00085.x ↗
33. Probability of recent bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) on Norway spruce (Picea abies) in a low mountain range in Germany –a preliminary analysis10.14214/sf.269 ↗
34. Browsing regime and growth response of naturally regenerated Abies alba saplings along light gradients10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.048 ↗
35. Capacity of the forest hunting grounds on the example of the Kluczbork Forest District
36. Wagenknecht, E. (1967). Management of Our Hoofed Game Stocks, Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag. (In German).
37. Supplementary winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: Justifications, feeding practice and effectiveness10.1111/j.1365-2907.2004.00044.x ↗
38. (2022, August 15). Statistical Yearbook of Forestry; Statistics Poland: Warszawa, Poland, 2021, Available online: https://stat.gov.pl.
39. Ripping of spruce and pine trees by big game animals
40. Bark-stripping on Norway spruce by red deer in Sweden: Level of damage and relation to tree characteristics10.1080/02827581.2012.701323 ↗
41. Observations on bark-stripping by red deer in a Picea sitchensis forest in Western Scotland over a 35-year period10.1080/02827581.2016.1247464 ↗
42. Bark stripping of Pinus contorta caused by moose and deer: Wounding patterns, discoloration of wood, and associated fungi10.1139/cjfr-2015-0119 ↗
43. Long-term pathological consequences of resin tapping wounds on stems of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)10.1007/s00468-022-02307-y ↗
44. Damage to trees due to forestry operations and its pathological significance in temperate forests10.1093/forestry/74.4.319 ↗
45. Moose browsing in young Scots pine stands in relation to forest management10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03823-6 ↗
46. Economic evaluation of bark stripping by red deer on the basis of analysis on a time growth series of spruce stands in the Hruby Jesenik Mts (Czech Republic)
47. Havrysh, V., Kalinichenko, A., Brzozowska, A., and Stebila, J. (2021). Agricultural Residue Management for Sustainable Power Generation: The Poland Case Study. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11135907 ↗
48. Schaller, M. (2002). Economic Assessment of Bark Stripping Damage in the Forest. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Munich].
49. Fungi in bark peeling wounds of Picea abies in central Sweden10.1111/j.1439-0329.1996.tb01074.x ↗
50. Kjell, D., Bergström, D.P., and Pastor, J. (2006). The influence of large herbivores on tree recruitment and forest dynamics. Large Herbivore Ecology and Ecosystem Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.
51. Impact of ungulates on structure and dynamics of natural regeneration of mixed mountain forests in the Bavarian Alps10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03808-X ↗
52. The impact of deer on woodlands: The effects of browsing and seed dispersal on vegetation structure and composition10.1093/forestry/74.3.209 ↗
53. Ecological impacts of increasing numbers of deer in British woodland10.1093/forestry/74.3.193 ↗
54. A natural experiment on the impact of overabundant deer on forest invertebrates10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00280.x ↗
55. Decreasing the deer population is in the interest of our forest
56. (2022, January 06). Forest Management Plan for Opole Forest Division from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2023, (In Polish).
57. (2022, January 06). Forest Management Plan for Prószków Forest Division from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2024, (In Polish).
58. (2022, January 06). Forest Management Plan for Tułowice Forest Division from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2023, (In Polish).
59. R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, version 4.1.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: http://www.R-project.org.
60. Thode, H.C. (2002). Testing for Normality, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203910894 ↗
61. Gross, J., and Ligges, U. (2022, July 10). Nortest: Tests for Normality. R Package Version 1.0-4., 2012. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nortest.
62. Diagnostic Checking in Regression Relationships’
63. Chambers, J.M., and Hastie, T.J. (1993). Statistical Models in S. Computer Science Series, Chapman & Hall.
64. Faraway, J.J. (2016). Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models, Chapman and Hall. Available online: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1367022.10.1201/9781315382722 ↗
65. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x ↗
66. Andrzejczyk, T., and Żybura, H. (2012). Scots Pine: Natural Regeneration and Alternative Farming Methods, PWRiL. (In Polish).
67. (2022, July 05). Forest Data Bank, Available online: https://www.dbl.lasy.gov.pl/portal/wisl.
68. Influence of deer bark-stripping on the diameter breast height on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)
69. Sporek, K., and Sporek, M. (2016). Ecological Experimentation–Selected Methods, University of Opole. (In Polish).
70. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) demonstrates a high resistance against bark stripping damage10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120182 ↗
71. Wpływ spałowania na wielkość wybranych cech pomiarowych sosny I klasy wieku w Nadleśnictwie Syców
72. Overgrowth, vitality and length of annual shoots on bark stripping saplings
73. Influence of Scots pine the bark stripping by game on tree incremental ratios
74. Consequences of injury caused by timber harvesting machines on the growth and decay of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.)
75. Influence of bark stripping down caused by deer on the increase in height and volume of firs (Abies alba Mill.)
76. Ebiś, M. (2001). Structure of the biomass of the Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), PWN. (In Polish).
77. Szymkiewicz, B. (1961). Tables of Stands Volume and Increment, PWRiL. (In Polish).
78. Bark-stripping damage by red deer in a Sitka spruce forest in western Scotland IV. Survival and performance of wounded trees10.1093/forestry/71.3.225 ↗