A New Approach for Environmental Risk Assessments of Living Modified Organisms in South Korea
Source abstract
Abstract
As the development and use of living modified organisms (LMOs) steadily increase, new risk assessment methods that reflect domestic natural ecosystems are being developed. Although LM plants are fundamentally necessary for environmental risk assessment, the introduced gene products and LMO proteins can replace transgenic plants. However, their use is problematic because of instability and indirect assessment data issues. This study proposes a risk assessment tool and scheme for introducing LMO proteins into genetically modified crops. The agroinfiltration method for transient LMO gene expression in plants is a practical tool which can be used to rapidly verify the putative risks of LMO proteins against insects using an LM crop mimic plant with a stably expressed LMO protein. This study used Nicotiana tabacum leaves, which transiently but stably expressed the insecticidal LMO protein Vip3Aa, for LMO risk assessments against Spodoptera litura. The Vip3Aa protein was stably expressed for 5 d in the agroinfiltrated plants, and the protein was active against target insects for environmental LMO risk assessments. In the toxicity evaluation of Vip3Aa-expressing plants against S. litura, the number of deaths was higher in the Vip3Aa-infiltrated N. tabacum-fed group than that in the recombinant Vip3Aa-fed group. In addition, the cumulative number of deaths in the infiltration leaf-fed group was approximately 12-fold higher than that in the protein-fed group under low dosage conditions. This study aimed to develop a transient expression model which can be used to evaluate whether the overall risk of LMO protein is acceptable for use. These results support the usefulness of the transient expression model using an agroinfiltration method as a rapid risk validation tool for LMO proteins against herbivorous insects before producing transgenic plants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Insect Resistance and Genetics · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Insect and Pesticide Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LMO Team, National Institute of Ecology (NIE), Seocheon 33657, Korea
Funding
National Institute of Ecology (NIE)
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Risks and precautions of genetically modified organisms
2. Regulation of synthetic biology: Developments under the convention on biological diversity and its protocols10.3389/fbioe.2020.00310 ↗
3. The influence of the Cartagena Protocol on biosafety: Comparing Mexico, China and South Africa10.1162/glep.2006.6.4.23 ↗
4. Implications of import regulations and information requirements under the Cartagena Protocol on biosafety for GM commodities in Kenya
5. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world10.1007/s11248-021-00257-8 ↗
6. Kim, T. (2003). The Regulatory Framework for Genetically Modified Agricultural Products in Korea, Food and Fertilizer Technology Center.
7. Status of policies relating biosafety
8. Technocratic precautionary principle: Korean risk governance of genetically modified organisms10.1080/14636778.2014.917916 ↗
9. Presence of environmental risk assessments for LMOs in nature and future considerations based on new biotechnologies10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.3.297 ↗
10. Nam, K.H., and Han, S.M. (2020). Seed germination of sunflower as a case study for the risk assessment and management of transgenic plants used for environmental remediation in South Korea. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su122310110 ↗
11. Kim, I.R., Lim, H.S., Choi, W.K., Kang, D.I., Lee, S.Y., and Lee, J.R. (2020). Monitoring living modified canola using an efficient multiplex PCR assay in natural environments in South Korea. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217721 ↗
12. Lim, H.S., Kim, I.R., Lee, S.H., Choi, W.K., Yoon, Y.M., and Lee, J.R. (2021). Establishment and application of a monitoring strategy for living modified cotton in natural environments in South Korea. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110259 ↗
13. Risk assessment of genetically modified organisms
14. Compositional equivalence assessment of insectresistant genetically modified rice using multiple statistical analyses10.1080/21645698.2021.1893624 ↗
15. (2021, December 28). R&D LMO Safety Management. Statute Book II, Cheongju, Korea. Available online: https://www.ip-korea.org/lib/pdf_view.php.
16. Status and prospect of safety evaluation of genetically modified microorganism (GMM) for domestic and foreign food application
17. Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops10.1007/s11248-015-9892-6 ↗
18. Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants: A conceptual framework10.1007/s11248-014-9785-0 ↗
19. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2010). Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J., 8, 1879.10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879 ↗
20. Problem formulation in environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: A practitioner’s approach
21. A novel governance framework for GMO10.15252/embr.201947812 ↗
22. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants-concepts and controversies10.1186/2190-4715-23-13 ↗
23. A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms10.1051/ebr:2006018 ↗
24. Nicotiana benthamiana: Its history and future as a model for plant-pathogen interactions10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1015 ↗
25. A highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated method for transient gene expression and functional studies in multiple plant species10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100028 ↗
26. The use of agroinfiltration for transient expression of plant resistance and fungal effector proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves10.1007/978-1-61779-501-5_4 ↗
27. Chen, Z., Zeng, M., Song, B., Hou, C., Hu, D., Li, X., Wang, Z., Fan, H., Bi, L., and Liu, J. (2012). Dufulin activates HrBP1 to produce antiviral responses in tobacco. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0037944 ↗
28. Purification and risk assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa protein against Apis mellifera10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.4.585 ↗
29. Review of the McMorran diet for rearing Lepidoptera Species with addition of a further 39 species10.1093/jisesa/iev151 ↗
30. A global approach to resistance monitoring10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.013 ↗
31. Europe’s first and last field trial of gene-edited plants?10.7554/eLife.42379 ↗
32. Prospect of GMO monitering of LMO facilities with NGOs10.29335/tals.2017.54.23 ↗
33. A study on the establishment of isolation distances for environmental release of biotech crops
34. Transient expression systems for plant-derived biopharmaceuticals10.1586/erv.10.85 ↗
35. Risk assessment of information on the subcombination Bt11 3 MIR162, related to the application of Syngenta (EFSA-GMO-DE-2009-66) for authorization of food and feed containing, consisting and produced from genetically modified maize Bt11 3 MIR162 3 MIR604 3 GA21
36. Syngenta Australia Pty Ltd (2018). Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan for DIR 157. Commercial Release of Cotton Genetically Modified for Insect Resistance (COT102).
37. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ia10 and Vip3Aa protein interactions and their toxicity in Spodoptera spp. (Lepidoptera)10.1016/j.jip.2012.11.011 ↗
38. Comparison of in vitro and in planta toxicity of Vip3A for lepidopteran herbivores10.1093/jee/toaa211 ↗
39. Ten years of Bt resistance monitoring in the European corn borer: What we know, what we don’t know, and what we can do better10.1093/ae/53.4.208 ↗
40. Cloning, expression and bioassay of Vip3A protein from an indigenous Bacillus thuringiensis Isolate
41. Bacterial vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) from entomopathogenic bacteria10.1128/MMBR.00060-15 ↗