journal article·2022-03-23Open access

New Metric for Evaluation of Deep Neural Network Applied in Vision-Based Systems

Fateme Bakhshande, Daniel Adofo Ameyaw, Neelu Madan, Dirk Söffker

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

Vision-based object detection plays a crucial role for the complete functionality of many engineering systems. Typically, detectors or classifiers are used to detect objects or to distinguish different targets. This contribution presents a new evaluation of CNN classifiers in image detection using a modified Probability of Detection reliability measure. The proposed method allows the evaluation of further image parameters affecting the classification results. The proposed evaluation method is implemented on images and comparisons made on parameters with the best detection capability. A typical certification standard (90/95) denoting a 90% probability of detection at 95% reliability level is adapted and successfully applied. Using the 90/95 standard, comparisons are made between different image parameters. A noise analysis procedure is introduced, permitting the trade-off between the detection rate, false alarms, and process parameters. The advantage of the novel approach is experimentally evaluated for vision-based classification results of CNN considering different image parameters. With this new POD evaluation, classifiers will become a trustworthy part of vision systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Dynamics and Control, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany

Visual Analysis and Perception Lab, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Classification assessment methods10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003 ↗
2. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 ↗
3. Group collaborative representation for image set classification10.1007/s11263-018-1088-0 ↗
4. An effective image classification method for shallow densely connected convolution networks through squeezing and splitting techniques10.1007/s10489-019-01468-7 ↗
5. Cost-sensitive hierarchical classification for imbalance classes10.1007/s10489-019-01624-z ↗
6. Collaborative linear coding for robust image classification10.1007/s11263-014-0739-z ↗
7. Mas, J. (2018). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography., Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-60801-3_30 ↗
8. Finding the best classification threshold in imbalanced classification10.1016/j.bdr.2015.12.001 ↗
9. Deep learning for generic object detection: A survey10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 ↗
10. Object detection with deep learning: A review10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2876865 ↗
11. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 ↗
12. Kwon, H.J., and Lee, S.H. (2020). Contrast Sensitivity Based Multiscale Base–Detail Separation for Enhanced HDR Imaging. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072513 ↗
13. Black-box adversarial attacks by manipulating image attributes10.1016/j.ins.2020.10.028 ↗
14. A social spider optimized image fusion approach for contrast enhancement and brightness preservation10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.012 ↗
15. Department of Defense (2009). Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment, MIL-HDBK-1823A.
16. Hübschen, G., Altpeter, I., Tschuncky, R., and Herrmann, H.G. (2016). Materials Characterization Using Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Methods, Elsevier Science.
17. A novel feature-based probability of detection assessment and fusion approach for reliability evaluation of vibration-based diagnosis systems10.1177/1475921719856274 ↗
18. Ameyaw, D.A., Deng, Q., and Söffker, D. (2019, January 23–26). Probability of Detection (POD)-based Metric for Evaluation of Classifiers Used in Driving Behavior Prediction. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the PHM Society, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.10.36001/phmconf.2019.v11i1.774 ↗
19. The precision-recall curve overcame the optimism of the receiver operating characteristic curve in rare diseases10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.010 ↗
20. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
21. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.C. (2018, January 18–23). MobileNet v2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
22. POD curves, their derivation, applications and limitations
23. A model-based approach for statistical assessment of detection and localization performance of guided wave-based imaging techniques10.1177/1475921717744679 ↗
24. How to evaluate classifier performance in the presence of additional effects: A new POD-based approach allowing certification of machine learning approaches
25. Gandossi, L., and Annis, C. (2010). Probability of Detection Curves: Statistical Best-Practices, Office for official Publications of the European Communities. ENIQ Report, 41.
26. Annis, C. (2021). Statistical Best-Practices for Building Probability of Detection (POD) Models, Available online: http://StatisticalEngineering.com/mh1823.
27. Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J., and Li, W. (2005). Applied Linear Statistical Models, McGraw-Hill Irwin.
28. Confidence bands for cumulative distribution functions of continuous random variables10.1080/00401706.1983.10487822 ↗
29. Anil, S. (2021, October 09). Anilsathyan7/Pytorch-Image-Classification: First Release of Pytorch Image Classification. GitHub. Available online: https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/219696552.
30. A survey on deep transfer learning10.1007/978-3-030-01424-7_27 ↗
31. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. (2009, January 20–25). Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗