Assessment of Two Streamline Curvature Correction Methods for an Elliptic Blending Turbulence Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Using two different methods, a previously developed elliptic blending model (the original STT k-ω-φ-α model) is modified for sensitization to streamline curvature. One method involves modifying the dissipation term in the turbulent dissipation equation, while the other constructs a new formulation for the turbulent kinetic energy production term based on an explicit algebraic stress model. The capabilities of the proposed models are evaluated by applying them to three flows with curved surfaces; namely, the two-dimensional (2D) infinite serpentine passage flow, the 2D U-turn duct flow, and the 2D periodic hill flow. The STT k-ω model with rotation and curvature correction (the STT k-ω-CC model) is also used for comparison. The computed results are compared with the relevant direct numerical simulation, experimental, and large eddy simulation data from the literature. It is found that the two proposed models significantly improve upon the original STT k-ω-φ-α model. Compared with the STT k-ω-CC model, the two proposed models produce better results in the 2D infinite serpentine passage flow and the 2D periodic hill flow. The proposed models are similarly competitive with the STT k-ω-CC model in the 2D U-turn duct flow.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Key Laboratory for Resilient Infrastructures of Coastal Cities (MOE), Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen, China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature10.1016/S1270-9638(97)90051-1 ↗
2. Turbulence Modeling in Rotating and Curved Channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur Correction10.2514/2.1058 ↗
3. Sensitization of the SST Turbulence Model to Rotation and Curvature by Applying the Spalart–Shur Correction Term10.1115/1.3070573 ↗
4. A curvature correction turbulent model for computations of cloud cavitating flows10.1108/EC-01-2015-0026 ↗
5. A new simpler rotation/curvature correction method for Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model10.1016/j.cja.2013.02.009 ↗
6. Modeling rotational effects in eddy-viscosity closures10.1016/S0142-727X(99)00056-9 ↗
7. Eddy viscosity modeling around curved boundaries through bifurcation approach and theory of rotating turbulence10.1063/5.0056680 ↗
8. On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows10.1017/S0022112093002034 ↗
9. A simple and robust linear eddy-viscosity formulation for curved and rotating flows10.1108/09615530910972995 ↗
10. Dhakal, T.P., and Walters, D.K. (2009, January 2–6). Curvature and Rotation Sensitive Variants of the K-Omega SST Turbulence Model. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Vail, CO, USA.10.1115/FEDSM2009-78397 ↗
11. A Modified k-ε Model for Computation of Flows with Large Streamline Curvature10.1155/2013/592420 ↗
12. Hellsten, A. (1997, January 15–18). Some improvements in Menter’s k-omega SST turbulence model. Proceedings of the 29th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Albuquerque, NM, USA.10.2514/6.1998-2554 ↗
13. An Eddy-Viscosity Model Sensitized to Curvature and Wall-Roughness Effects for Reynolds-Averaged Closure10.1115/1.4045611 ↗
14. Review: Adapting Scalar Turbulence Closure Models for Rotation and Curvature10.1115/1.4004150 ↗
15. Review on the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation/curvature and the application to rotating machinery
16. A shear stress transport incorporated elliptic blending turbulence model applied to near-wall, separated and impinging jet flows and heat transfer10.1016/j.camwa.2020.01.024 ↗
17. Kato, M. (1993, January 16–18). The modeling of turbulent flow around stationary and vibrating square cylinders. Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on “Turbulent Shear Flows”, Kyoto, Japan.
18. Menter, F., Ferreira, J.C., Esch, T., and Konno, B. (2003, January 2–7). The SST Turbulence Model with Improved Wall Treatment for Heat Transfer Predictions in Gas Turbines. Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress 2003, Tokyo, Japan.
19. Modeling rotation and curvature effects within scalar eddy viscosity model framework10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.11.006 ↗
20. Zhang, X., and Agarwal, R.K. (2019, January 7–11). Applications of a DES Model Based on Wray-Agarwal Turbulence Model with Rotation and Curvature Correction. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2019-0082 ↗
21. Frey Marioni, Y., de Toledo Ortiz, E.A., Cassinelli, A., Montomoli, F., Adami, P., and Vazquez, R. (2021). A Machine Learning Approach to Improve Turbulence Modelling from DNS Data Using Neural Networks. Int. J. Turbomach. Propuls. Power, 6.10.3390/ijtpp6020017 ↗
22. Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flow through a stationary and rotating infinite serpentine passage10.1063/1.2404940 ↗
23. Monson, D., Seegmiller, H., and McConnaughey, P. (1990, January 18–20). Comparison of experiment with calculations using curvature-corrected zero and two equation turbulence models for a two-dimensional U-duct. Proceedings of the 21st Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Seattle, WA, USA.10.2514/6.1990-1484 ↗
24. Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.05.001 ↗
25. The Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Turbulent Flow Predictions. Part 1: Theory and Model Description10.1007/s10494-010-9264-5 ↗
26. Application of recently developed elliptic blending based models to separated flows10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.04.012 ↗
27. Extending the bounds of ‘steady’ RANS closures: Toward an instability-sensitive Reynolds stress model10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.09.003 ↗
28. Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions10.1017/S0022112004002812 ↗
29. General explicit algebraic stress relations and best approximation for three-dimensional flows10.1016/S0020-7225(97)00122-5 ↗