Analysis of Initial Cracking of an Interface between a Bundled Lipped Channel–Concrete Composite Wall and an Infill Wall
Source abstract
Abstract
The bundled lipped channel–concrete (BLC-C) composite wall structure is a new structure with several advantages such as a high bearing capacity and good seismic performance. However, interface cracks between a BLC-C composite wall and the infill wall (non-structural wall) are a severe problem and need to be urgently resolved. Interface cracks affect not only the esthetics, but also the normal use of a building. The presence of interface cracks changes the perceptions of the owners of a structure, forcing them to question its safety and even take legal action against its developer. Therefore, in this study we aimed to investigate the initial cracking of the interface between a BLC-C composite wall and an infill wall. Unidirectional horizontal loading tests were conducted on two infill wall specimens constrained by BLC-C composite walls on both sides. The finite element analysis software ANSYS was used to simulate the loading process of the tests. The test results were compared to verify the accuracy of the finite element model. A finite element analysis was conducted to determine the effect of the horizontal displacement of the specimens when the interface initially cracked under different parameters such as the widths of the BLC-C composite wall, infill wall, and opening as well as the strength grade of the bricks and maximum normal contact stress. The results showed that a decrease in the width of the BLC-C composite wall or a rise in the width of the infill wall delayed the appearance of interface cracks. A large opening also delayed the occurrence of interface cracks. An enhancement in the strength grade of the bricks led to an earlier appearance of interface cracks. Interface cracks occurred later with an increase in the maximum normal contact stress between the BLC-C composite wall and the infill wall.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Experimental seismic behavior of innovative composite shear walls10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.015 ↗
2. Experiment on seismic performance of bundled lipped channel-concrete composite wall and beam-flange-strengthened connections
3. Finite element analysis on axial compression behavior of steel tube confined concrete shear wall
4. Experimental behavior of innovative T-shaped composite shear walls under in-plane cyclic loading10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.008 ↗
5. Experimental study on seismic performance of connections between bundled lipped channel-concrete (BLC-C) composite wall and steel beam
6. Parametric analysis and calculation method for bending and shear capacities of innovative composite shear walls10.1177/1369433216670171 ↗
7. Experimental study of rectangular multi-partition steel-concrete composite shear walls10.1016/j.tws.2018.06.011 ↗
8. Sun, H., Xu, Q., Yan, P., Yin, J., and Lou, P. (2020). A study on axial compression performance of concrete-filled steel-tubular shear wall with a multi-cavity T-shaped cross-section. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13184831 ↗
9. Lateral Stiffness of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete (RC) Frames with Central Opening10.1193/1.2942376 ↗
10. Shake-table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall10.1002/eqe.612 ↗
11. On the in-plane properties and capacities of infilled frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.057 ↗
12. A macro-modelling approach for the analysis of infilled frame structures considering the effects of openings and vertical loads10.1080/15732479.2015.1030761 ↗
13. Numerical modelling of out-of-plane response of infilled frames: State of the art and future challenges for the equivalent strut macromodels10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.012 ↗
14. Pseudodynamic Testing of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:6(578) ↗
15. Numerical modeling of masonry-infilled RC frames subjected to seismic loads10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.01.006 ↗
16. (2010). Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (Standard No. GB 50011).
17. Pushover test study of masonry structure restrained by steel-tube-bundle shear walls
18. (2018). Technical Standard for Structures with Concrete-Filled Multicellular Steel Tube Walls (Standard No. T/CECS 546).
19. Research on resilience model of steel tube bundle composite shear wall
20. (2013). Test Methods of Physical Property for Dry-Mix Mortar (Standard No. GB/T 29756).
21. (2010). Code for Design of Concrete Structures (Standard No. GB 50010).
22. Turnšek, V., and Čačovič, F. (1970, January 12–15). Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls. Proceedings of the 2nd International Brick Masonry Conference, Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Available online: http://www.hms.civil.uminho.pt/ibmac/1970/149.pdf.
23. (2010). Code for Design of Masonry Structures (Standard No. GB 50003).
24. Finite element analysis for concrete infilled steel frame
25. Flexural response analysis of passive and active near-surface-mounted joints: Experimental and finite element analysis10.1617/s11527-018-1232-x ↗
26. Crack identification in reinforced concrete beams using ANSYS software10.1007/s11223-010-9212-6 ↗
27. Bond behavior of GFRP bar-concrete interface: Damage evolution assessment and FE simulation implementations10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.078 ↗
28. Experimental observations on the in-plane behaviour of masonry wall infilled RC frames; focusing on deformation limits and backbone curve10.1007/s10518-017-0248-x ↗
29. Masonry infills and RC frames interaction: Literature overview and state of the art of macromodeling approach10.1080/19648189.2014.996671 ↗
30. Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1071) ↗
31. Model test results of vertical and horizontal loading of infilled frames