Two Low-Level Feature Distributions Based No Reference Image Quality Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
No reference image quality assessment (NR IQA) aims to develop quantitative measures to automatically and accurately estimate perceptual image quality without any prior information about the reference image. In this paper, we introduce two low-level feature distributions (TLLFD) based method for NR IQA. Different from the deep learning method, the proposed method characterizes image quality with the distributions of low-level features, thus it has few parameters, simple model, high efficiency, and strong robustness. First, the texture change of distorted image is extracted by the weighted histogram of generalized local binary pattern. Second, the Weibull distribution of gradient is extracted to represent the structural change of the distorted image. Furthermore, support vector regression is adopted to model the complex nonlinear relationship between feature space and quality measure. Finally, numerical tests are performed on LIVE, CISQ, MICT, and TID2008 standard databases for five different distortion categories JPEG2000 (JP2K), JPEG, White Noise (WN), Gaussian Blur (GB), and Fast Fading (FF). The experimental results indicate that TLLFD method achieves superior performance and strong generalization for image quality prediction as compared to state-of-the-art full-reference, no reference, and even deep learning IQA methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image and Video Quality Assessment · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Image Enhancement Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key research and development programs of Ningxia · Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Automatic prediction of perceptual quality of multimedsignalsa survey10.1007/s11042-010-0625-9 ↗
2. Overview on image quality assessment methods10.3724/SP.J.1146.2009.00091 ↗
3. No-reference quality assessment of deblocked images10.1016/j.neucom.2015.11.063 ↗
4. Convolutional neural networks in image understanding
5. Broad learning system: An effective and efficient incremental learn-ing system without the need for deep architecture10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2716952 ↗
6. Zhou, Z.H., and Feng, J. (2017). Deep forest: Towards an alternative to deep neural net-works. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2017/497 ↗
7. Deep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2017.2760518 ↗
8. End-to-end blind image quality assessment using deep neural networks10.1109/TIP.2017.2774045 ↗
9. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions10.1016/0031-3203(95)00067-4 ↗
10. Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00032-1 ↗
11. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017623 ↗
12. Blind image quality assessment using statistical structural and luminance features10.1109/TMM.2016.2601028 ↗
13. Referenceless quality metric of multiply-distorted images based on structural degradation10.1016/j.neucom.2018.02.050 ↗
14. No reference image blurriness assessment with localbinary patterns10.1016/j.jvcir.2017.09.011 ↗
15. Blind Image Quality Assessment Using the Joint Statistics of Generalized Local Binary Pattern10.1109/LSP.2014.2326399 ↗
16. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
17. FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730 ↗
18. Image Quality Assessment Based on Gradient Similarity10.1109/TIP.2011.2175935 ↗
19. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index10.1109/TIP.2013.2293423 ↗
20. Blind image quality assessment by relative gradient statistics and adaboosting neural network10.1016/j.image.2015.10.005 ↗
21. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050 ↗
22. Making a completely blind image quality analyzer10.1109/LSP.2012.2227726 ↗
23. A completed modeling of local binary pattern operator for texture classification10.1109/TIP.2010.2044957 ↗
24. Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., and Boyle, R. (2008). Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision, Cengage Learning.
25. Jähne, B., Haussecker, H., and Geissler, P. (1999). Handbook of Computer Vision and Applications, Academic.
26. Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images10.1167/9.4.29 ↗
27. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
28. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines10.1145/1961189.1961199 ↗
29. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A.J., and Bach, F. (2002). Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Re-Gularization, Optimization, and Beyond, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4175.001.0001 ↗
30. A Two-Step Framework for Constructing Blind Image Quality Indices10.1109/LSP.2010.2043888 ↗
31. Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality10.1109/TIP.2011.2147325 ↗
32. Sheikh, H.R., Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., and Cormack, L.K. (2018, December 10). Image and Video Quality Assessment Research at LIVE. Available online: http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/.
33. TID2008 d-atabase for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics
34. Larson, E.C., and Chandler, D.M. (2018, December 10). Categorical Image Quality (CSIQ) Database. Available online: http://vision.okstate.edu/csiq.
35. Horita, Y., Shibata, K., and Kawayoke, Y. (2021, December 15). MICT Image Quality Assessment Database. Available online: http://mict.eng.utoyama.ac.jp/mictdb.html.
36. (2018, December 10). Final Report From the Video Quality Experts Group on the Validation of Objective Models of Video Quality Assessment VQEG. Available online: http://www.vqeg.org.
37. A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms10.1109/TIP.2006.881959 ↗
38. VSI: A Visual Saliency-Induced Index for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment10.1109/TIP.2014.2346028 ↗
39. A Feature-Enriched Completely Blind Image Quality E-valuator10.1109/TIP.2015.2426416 ↗
40. Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain10.1109/TIP.2012.2191563 ↗
41. Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Joint Statistics of Gradient Magnitude and Laplacian Features10.1109/TIP.2014.2355716 ↗
42. Using Free Energy Principle For Blind Image Quality Assessment10.1109/TMM.2014.2373812 ↗
43. Dipiq: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs10.1109/TIP.2017.2708503 ↗
44. Kang, L., Ye, P., Li, Y., and Doermann, D. (2014, January 23–28). Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2014, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.224 ↗