journal article·2022-04-30Open access

Individual and School Correlates of DIT-2 Scores Using a Multilevel Modeling and Data Mining Analysis

Meghan Bankhead, Youn-Jeng Choi, Yogendra Patil, Stephen J. Thoma

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

Moral reasoning was investigated with respect to individual characteristics (i.e., education level, political orientation and sex) and school-related (i.e., university/college) factors using multilevel modeling and data mining analysis. We used the multilevel modeling to detect school effects on moral reasoning as well as individual effects for 16,334 students representing 79 different higher education institutions across the U.S. The school-related factors, such as the racial composition, student–faculty ratio, average SAT score, institution type, institutions’ geographical region, frequencies of morally relevant words in college course catalog, college mission and value statements were collected through website searches. Data mining analysis was utilized to extract and calculate the frequencies of morally relevant words from the website content. There were significant effects for the individual characteristic of political orientation. Additionally, all school-related factors were significant. Only main effects were observed for some school-related factors (i.e., average SAT score, institution type, frequency of morally relevant words in mission statements, value statements and course catalogs). For other school-related factors (i.e., the region, student–faculty ratio and racial composition), main effects were also observed; however, these effects were particularly illuminating given their interactions with political orientation. Implications for educational communities are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Academic Freedom and Politics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Psychological Science, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA

Department of Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea

Laboratoire d’Informatique de Grenoble, 38401 Grenoble, France

Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology and Counseling, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Moral judgement development in higher education: Insights from the Defining Issues Test10.1080/0305724022000008106 ↗
2. Pascarella, E.T., and Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research, Jossey-Bass.
3. Pascarella, E.T., and Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How College Affects Students: Vol. 2, A Third Decade of Research, Jossey-Bass.
4. Rest, J.R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger.
5. Relation of moral judgment development to formal education10.1037/0012-1649.21.4.709 ↗
6. Goslin, D.A. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. Handbook of Socialization Theory, Rand McNally.
7. A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory10.1023/A:1022053215271 ↗
8. Rest, J.R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., and Thoma, S.J. (1999). Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410603913 ↗
9. A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research10.1080/713679390 ↗
10. The friendship effect: Its role in the development of moral thinking in students10.1177/108648220000500204 ↗
11. Development of moral judgment among undergraduate college students
12. Understanding the relationship between moral judgment development and individual characteristics: The role of educational contexts10.1037/a0013381 ↗
13. A multilevel examination of the influence of institutional type on the moral reasoning development of first-year students10.1080/00221546.2012.11777248 ↗
14. Diversity and moral reasoning: How negative diverse peer interactions affect the development of moral reasoning in undergraduate students10.1080/00221546.2010.11779061 ↗
15. Pedagogical practices that contribute to social justice outcomes10.1353/rhe.2007.0055 ↗
16. How curricular and pedagogical strategies affect moral reasoning development in college students10.1080/03057240701803668 ↗
17. A multi-institutional assessment of moral reasoning development among first-year students10.1353/rhe.0.0153 ↗
18. How the first year of college influences moral reasoning development for students in moral consolidation and moral transition10.1353/csd.2012.0004 ↗
19. Rest, J.R. (1979). Development in Judging Moral Issues, University of Minnesota Press.
20. Mission statements, physical space, and strategy in higher education10.1007/s10755-009-9118-z ↗
21. Mission statements: One more time
22. Managing your mission: Advice on where to begin10.1177/108648220000400605 ↗
23. Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across international type10.1080/00221546.2006.11778934 ↗
24. Using school mission statements for reflection research10.1177/0013161X10387590 ↗
25. Does moral education improve moral judgment? A meta-analysis of intervention studies using the Defining Issues Test10.3102/00346543055003319 ↗
26. Evaluating moral reasoning outcomes in physical therapy ethics education: Stage, schema, phase, and type10.1179/1743288X12Y.0000000011 ↗
27. The defining issues test and the four component model: Contributions to professional education10.1080/0305724022000008115 ↗
28. The college experience and moral development
29. Killen, M., and Smetana, J. (2006). Research using the Defining Issues Test. Handbook of Moral Development, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.10.4324/9781410615336 ↗
30. Rest, J.R. (1986). Life experiences and developmental pathways. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger.
31. Are DIT scores empirically distinct from measures of political identification and intellectual ability? A test using post-9/11 data10.1348/026151006X103627 ↗
32. Does moral judgment development reduce to political attitudes or verbal ability? Evidence using the Defining Issues Test10.1023/A:1022005332110 ↗
33. Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues10.1016/0273-2297(86)90010-9 ↗
34. Killen, M., and Smetana, J. (2006). Gender and morality. Handbook of Moral Development, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.10.4324/9781410615336 ↗
35. Inspiration and cynicism in values statements10.1007/s10551-005-0188-2 ↗