Reconfiguration of a Bus Chassis Module Using the Digital Expression for Connectivity between Module Interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Modular design for a bus chassis is a practical solution to address different bus types and their differing powertrains. Physics interfaces are used to connect interacting subsystems in bus chassis modules. There are few studies focusing on the criteria for assessing interface connectivity, with significantly non-standard characteristics, between bus chassis modules. This study proposes criteria for assessing the interface connectivity in bus chassis modules in accordance with the digital expression of the module interface. Criteria for judging the compatibility of the connection between bus chassis modules are proposed and modular reconfiguration methods are provided, based on the criteria. Reconfiguration of the process matrix is constructed to indicate changes in position, shape, and size after the component is modified, based on the connectivity between modules. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the reconfiguration and replacement of the front suspension frame module of a bus chassis. The results demonstrated and proved the effectiveness of this method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Product Development and Customization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
Future Mobility Group, School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
Funding
Program of Bus and Specialty Vehicle Research & Design Collaborative Innovation Centre · National Natural Science Foundation of China · National High-End Expert Programme (HEEP)
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Vehicle Electrification: Status and Issues10.1109/JPROC.2011.2112750 ↗
2. Electric buses: A review of alternative powertrains10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.019 ↗
3. Well-to-Wheel analysis of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for conventional, hybrid-electric and plug-in hybrid-electric city buses in the BRT system in Curitiba, Brazil10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.015 ↗
4. Prospects for Chinese electric vehicle technologies in 2016–2020: Ambition and rationality10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.114 ↗
5. Modular route bus design—A method of meeting transport operation and vehicle manufacturing requirements10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.002 ↗
6. Development of a New Hybrid Bus for Urban Public Transportation10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.131 ↗
7. Digital twin-driven rapid reconfiguration of the automated manufacturing system via an open architecture model10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101895 ↗
8. Managing in an age of modularity
9. Product modularization and effects on efficiency: An analysis of a bus manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA)10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.008 ↗
10. Dasu, S., and Eastman, C. (1994). Fundamentals of Product Modularity. Management of Design: Engineering and Management Perspectives, Springer.
11. Frameworks for Product Family Design and Development10.1177/1063293X07079326 ↗
12. Interface diagram: Design tool for supporting the development of modularity in complex product systems10.1177/1063293X13516329 ↗
13. Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00027-X ↗
14. Exploratory analysis of the variables prevailing on the effects of product modularization on production volume and efficiency10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.028 ↗
15. Managerial implications of the modular consortium model in a Brazilian automotive plant10.1108/01443579810368290 ↗
16. (2021, December 20). ISE Corporation. Available online: http://www.isecorp.com.
17. Revisiting the role of modular innovation in technological radicalness and architectural change of products: The case of Tesla X and Roomba10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102163 ↗
18. Schuh, G., Arnoscht, J., Rudolf, S., and Korthals, K. (2013). Modular Chassis Product Platform Considering Variable Quantities for an Economical Electric Vehicle Production, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-24491-9_8 ↗
19. A digital expression method for the module interface in a practical bus chassis modular design and case history10.1177/1063293X18799447 ↗
20. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 ↗
21. Rassolkin, A., Vaimann, T., Kallaste, A., and Kuts, V. (2019, January 7–9). Digital twin for propulsion drive of autonomous electric vehicle. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 60th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON), Riga, Latvia.10.1109/RTUCON48111.2019.8982326 ↗
22. Towards the future of smart electric vehicles: Digital twin technology10.1016/j.rser.2021.110801 ↗
23. Open-architecture products10.1016/j.cirp.2013.06.001 ↗
24. Baldwin, C.Y., and Clark, K.B. (2000). Design Rules Volume I: The Power of Modularity, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 ↗
25. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3 ↗
26. Interface strategies in modular product innovation10.1016/j.technovation.2004.01.013 ↗
27. Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.002 ↗
28. A systematic literature review on modular product design10.1080/09544828.2016.1166482 ↗
29. Pereira, M., Weingaertner, W., and Forcellini, F. (2005). Design Methodology for Reconfigurable Precision Systems Applied to a Sclerometer Development, Cirp-International Seminar on Manufacturing Systems.
30. Incorporating design effort complexity measures in product architectural design and assessment10.1016/j.destud.2004.10.001 ↗
31. An interface complexity measure for component-based software systems
32. Product Interface Design for Complexity Management in Assembly Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045041 ↗
33. Ulrich, K.T., and Eppinger, S.D. (2003). Product Design and Development, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
34. Sinha, K., and de Weck, O.L. (2013, January 4–7). Structural Complexity Quantification for Engineered Complex Systems and Implications on System Architecture and Design. Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Portland, OR, USA.10.1115/DETC2013-12013 ↗
35. Sheard, S.A., and Mostashari, A. (2010, January 12–15). 7.3.1 A Complexity Typology for Systems Engineering. Proceedings of the INCOSE International Symposium, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1002/j.2334-5837.2010.tb01115.x ↗