Experimental and numerical investigation of joint geometry effects on the mechanical integrity of 3D-printed polymer bonded structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Adams, R.D., Peppiatt, N.A.: Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints. J. Strain Anal. 9, 185–196 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247V09318510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
2. Ahn, S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., Wright, P.K.: Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping J. 8, 248–257 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
3. Amaro, A.M., Neto, M.A., Loureiro, A., Reis, P.N.B.: Taper’s angle influence on the structural integrity of single-lap bonded joints. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 96, 231–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.05.00610.1016/j.tafmec.2018.05.006 ↗
4. ASTM D3163–01: Standard test method for determining strength of adhesively bonded rigid plastic lap-shear joints in shear by tension loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2023)
5. Atahan, M.G., Apalak, M.K.: Loading-rate effect on tensile and bending strength of 3D-printed polylactic acid adhesively bonded joints. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 36, 317–344 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.192202210.1080/01694243.2021.1922022 ↗
6. Atahan, M.G., Erikli, M., Ozipek, E., Ozgun, F.: Comparative study on bending behavior and damage analysis of 3D-printed sandwich core designs with bio-inspired reinforcements. Eng. Fail. Anal. 163, 108439 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10843910.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108439 ↗
7. Bak, K.M., Kalaichelvan, K., Vijayaraghavan, G.K., Dinesh, M., Arumugam, V.: Study on the effect of adhesive thickness of single lap joints using acoustic emission and FEA. Insight - Non-Destructive Test. Condition Monitor. 55, 35–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2012.55.1.3510.1784/insi.2012.55.1.35 ↗
8. Barros, R.B.P., Campilho, R.D.S.G., Sánchez-Arce, I.J., Dionísio, J.M.M., Madani, K.: Experimental analysis on the mixed-mode fracture behavior of structural adhesives. Procedia Struct. Integr. 51, 17–23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.10.06110.1016/j.prostr.2023.10.061 ↗
9. Benamar, B., Mokhtari, M., Madani, K., Benzaama, H.: Using a cohesive zone modeling to predict the compressive and tensile behavior on the failure load of single lap bonded joint. Fracture and Struct. Integrity. 13, 112–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.1110.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.11 ↗
10. Campilho, R.D.S.G., Banea, M.D., Neto, J.A.B.P., Da Silva, L.F.M.: Modelling of single-lap joints using cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive parameters on the output of the simulations. J. Adhes. 88, 513–533 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2012.66083410.1080/00218464.2012.660834 ↗
11. Campilho, R.D.S.G., Banea, M.D., Neto, J.A.B.P., da Silva, L.F.M.: Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 44, 48–56 (2013a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
12. Campilho, R.D., Chaves, F.J., Pinto, A.M., Banea, M.D., da Silva, L.F.: Influence of the cohesive law parameters on the strength prediction of adhesively-bonded joints in materials science forum. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Switzerland (2013)
13. Campilho, R.D.S.G., Madani, K., Prakash, C.: Advanced characterization of adhesive joints and adhesives. Materials 15, 7347 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1520734710.3390/ma15207347 ↗
14. Cavalcanti, D.K.K., Banea, M.D., Queiroz, H.F.M.: Mechanical characterization of bonded joints made of additive manufactured adherends. Ann. Dunarea Jos Univ. Galati Fascicle XII Weld. Equip. Technol. 30, 27–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35219/awet.2019.0410.35219/awet.2019.04 ↗
15. Cavalcanti, D.K.K., Medina, M., Queiroz, HFMde., Neto, J.S.S., Chaves, F.J.P., Banea, M.D.: Recent advances in adhesive bonding of 3D-printed parts and methods to increase their mechanical performance. Ann. Dunarea Jos Univ. Galati. Fascicle XII, Weld. Equip. Technol. 34, 17–24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.35219/awet.2023.0210.35219/awet.2023.02 ↗
16. Çitil, Ş: Experimental and 3D non-linear stress analysis of adhesively bonded curved and scarf lap joints. J. Theoretical Appl. Mech. (2021). https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl/12790210.15632/jtam-pl/127902 ↗
17. Correia, J.M.C., Campilho, R.D.S.G., Rocha, R.J.B., Liu, Y., Ramalho, L.D.C.: Parametric study of composite curved adhesive joints. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 111, 2957–2970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06314-610.1007/s00170-020-06314-6 ↗
18. Crocombe, A.D.: Global yielding as a failure criterion for bonded joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 9, 145–153 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(89)90110-310.1016/0143-7496(89)90110-3 ↗
19. da Silva, L.F.M., das Neves, P.J.C., Adams, R.D., Wang, A., Spelt, J.K.: Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part II: comparative study. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 29, 331–341 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.007 ↗
20. Dolzyk, G., Jung, S.: Tensile and fatigue analysis of 3D-printed polyethylene terephthalate glycol. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 19, 511–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00631-z10.1007/s11668-019-00631-z ↗
21. Ferreira, P.A.R., Campilho, R.D.S.G., Sánchez Arce, I.J., Gonçalves, D.C., Prakash, C.: Static strength prediction of curved composite joints under internal pressure. J. Adhes. 99, 2119–2144 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2023.217443410.1080/00218464.2023.2174434 ↗
22. Gleich, D.M., Van Tooren, M.J.L., Beukers, A.: Analysis and evaluation of bondline thickness effects on failure load in adhesively bonded structures. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 15, 1091–1101 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610131703550310.1163/156856101317035503 ↗
23. Houari, A., Madani, K., El Ajrami, M., Belhouari, M., Campilho, R.D.S.G.: Analysis of the substrate nature on the strength of a single-lap joint. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 469 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04397-210.1007/s40430-023-04397-2 ↗
24. Hu, P., Han, X., da Silva, L.F.M., Li, W.D.: Strength prediction of adhesively bonded joints under cyclic thermal loading using a cohesive zone model. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 41, 6–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.009 ↗
25. Huntsman: Araldite® 2021 Structural adhesive. , Huntsman advanced materials (2019)
26. Islam, M.A., Mobarak, M.H., Rimon, M.I.H., Al Mahmud, M.Z., Ghosh, J., Ahmed, M.M.S., Hossain, N.: Additive manufacturing in polymer research: advances, synthesis, and applications. Polym. Test. 132, 108364 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.10836410.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108364 ↗
27. Johnston, R., Kazancı, Z.: Analysis of additively manufactured (3D printed) dual-material auxetic structures under compression. Addit. Manuf. 38, 101783 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10178310.1016/j.addma.2020.101783 ↗
28. Karaca, M.M., Ekinci, İ, Ali, D.: Effect of geometric modifications on the compressive strength and mechanical performance of gyroid-based bone scaffolds. Int. J. 3D Print. Technol. Digital Industry 9, 63–72 (2025)
29. Kariž, M., Tomec, D.K., Dahle, S., Kuzman, M.K., Šernek, M., Žigon, J.: Effect of sanding and plasma treatment of 3D-printed parts on bonding to wood with PVAc adhesive. Polymers 13, 1211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1308121110.3390/polym13081211 ↗
30. Kasmi, S., Ginoux, G., Allaoui, S., Alix, S.: Investigation of 3D printing strategy on the mechanical performance of coextruded continuous carbon fiber reinforced PETG. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 138, 50955 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5095510.1002/app.50955 ↗
31. Katsivalis, I., Thomsen, O.T., Feih, S., Achintha, M.: Failure prediction and optimal selection of adhesives for glass/steel adhesive joints. Eng. Struct. 201, 109646 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10964610.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109646 ↗
32. Kaur, M., Yun, T.G., Han, S.M., Thomas, E.L., Kim, W.S.: 3D printed stretching-dominated micro-trusses. Mater. des. 134, 272–280 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.06110.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.061 ↗
33. Khosravani, M.R., Anders, D., Weinberg, K.: Influence of strain rate on fracture behavior of sandwich composite T-joints. Eur. J. Mech. a. Solids 78, 103821 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.10382110.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103821 ↗
34. Khosravani, M.R., Soltani, P., Reinicke, T.: Fracture and structural performance of adhesively bonded 3D-printed PETG single lap joints under different printing parameters. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 116, 103087 (2021a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10308710.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103087 ↗
35. Khosravani, M.R., Soltani, P., Weinberg, K., Reinicke, T.: Structural integrity of adhesively bonded 3D-printed joints. Polym. Test. (2021b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10726210.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107262 ↗
36. Khosravani, M.R., Soltani, P., Reinicke, T.: Failure and fracture in adhesively bonded 3D-printed joints: An overview on the current trends. Eng. Fail. Anal. 153, 107574 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10757410.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107574 ↗
37. Khosravani, M.R., Frohn-Sörensen, P., Engel, B., Reinicke, T.: Improvement of strength in single-lap adhesive joints of AlSi10Mg alloys fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Eur. J. Mech. a. Solids 109, 105458 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.10545810.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105458 ↗
38. Kupski, J., de Teixeira Freitas, S., Zarouchas, D., Camanho, P.P., Benedictus, R.: Composite layup effect on the failure mechanism of single lap bonded joints. Compos. Struct. 217, 14–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.093 ↗
39. Metehri, A., Madani, K., Campilho, R.D.S.G.: Numerical analysis of the geometrical modifications effects on the tensile strength of bonded single-lap joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 134, 103814 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.10381410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103814 ↗
40. Moya-Sanz, E.M., Ivañez, I., Garcia-Castillo, S.K.: Effect of the geometry in the strength of single-lap adhesive joints of composite laminates under uniaxial tensile load. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 72, 23–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.009 ↗
41. Mubashar, A., Ashcroft, I.A., Critchlow, G.W., Crocombe, A.D.: Strength prediction of adhesive joints after cyclic moisture conditioning using a cohesive zone model. Eng. Fract. Mech. 78, 2746–2760 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.07.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.07.010 ↗
42. Naat, N., Boutar, Y., Mezlini, S., da Silva, L.F.M., Alrasheedi, N.H., Hajlaoui, K.: Study of the effect of bio-inspired surface texture on the shear strength of bonded 3D-printed materials: Comparison between stainless steel and polycarbonate joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 131, 103658 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.10365810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103658 ↗
43. Naat, N., Boutar, Y., Naïmi, S., Mezlini, S., Akhavan-Safar, A., Carbas, R., da Silva, L.F.M.: Enhanced static and fatigue performance of FDM 3D-printed polycarbonate adhesive joints using bio-inspired surface textures. Eng. Fail. Anal. 176, 109626 (2025a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.10962610.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109626 ↗
44. Naat, N., Hajlaoui, K., Mezlini, S., da Silva, L.F.M.: Combined effect of bio-inspired surface patterning and plasma treatment on the bonding performance of 3D-printed polycarbonate. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2025b). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15969-y10.1007/s00170-025-15969-y ↗
45. Neto, J.A.B.P., Campilho, R.D.S.G., da Silva, L.F.M.: Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 37, 96–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.01910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.019 ↗
46. Öz, Ö., Öztürk, F.H.: An investigation on failure behaviour of bonded polylactic acid adherends produced by 3D printing process: experimental and numerical approach. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 399 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04321-810.1007/s40430-023-04321-8 ↗
47. Öz, Ö., Öztürk, F.H.: A comprehensive experimental study of the potential use of 3D printable thermoplastic polymers as structural adhesives. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 137, 6073–6090 (2025a). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15532-910.1007/s00170-025-15532-9 ↗
48. Öz, Ö., Öztürk, F.H.: The effect of adhesive and adherend compliance on the failure of 3D-printed parts. Weld. World (2025b). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-025-02048-910.1007/s40194-025-02048-9 ↗
49. Özen, A., Ganzosch, G., Barchiesi, E., Auhl, D.W., Müller, W.H.: Investigation of deformation behavior of PETG-FDM-printed metamaterials with pantographic substructures based on different slicing strategies. Compos. Adv. Mater. 30, 26349833211016476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/2634983321101647710.1177/26349833211016477 ↗
50. Öztürk, F.H.: Optimization of adherend thickness and overlap length on failure load of bonded 3D printed PETG parts using response surface method. Rapid Prototyp. J. 30, 1579–1591 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2024-009010.1108/RPJ-02-2024-0090 ↗
51. Öztürk, F.H., Öz, Ö.: Heat-treatment and water immersion effect on the mechanical properties and joint strength of 3D-printed polylactic acid parts. Polym. Adv. Technol. 35, e6624 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.662410.1002/pat.6624 ↗
52. Öztürk, F.H., Marques, Ea.S., Carbas, R.J.C., da Silva, L.F.M.: Experimental and numerical study on mechanical behavior of 3D printed adhesive joints with polycarbonate substrates. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 141, e55657 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5565710.1002/app.55657 ↗
53. Park, S.-J., Lee, J.-S.: Effect of surface treatment on shear bond strength of relining material and 3D-printed denture base. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 14, 262–272 (2022). https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.4.26210.4047/jap.2022.14.4.262 ↗
54. Pinheiro, G.J.C., Araújo, I.R.S., Campilho, R.D.S.G., Valente, J.P.A., Queirós, M.J.R., Madani, K.: Study of different initiation and propagation criteria in the XFEM modelling of scarf adhesive joints. Procedia Struct. Integr. 61, 71–78 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.06.01110.1016/j.prostr.2024.06.011 ↗
55. Pires, V.D., Carbas, R.J., Marques, E.A., da Silva, L.F.: Delamination prevention of composite joints with asymmetric carbon-fiber reinforced plastic adherends. J. Compos. Mater. 58, 1015–1029 (2024a). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998324123106210.1177/00219983241231062 ↗
56. Pires, V.D.C., Ribeiro, F.C.C., Carbas, R.J.C., Marques, E.A.S., da Silva, L.F.M.: The reduction of stress concentrations in adhesive joints with the use of curved aluminum adherends. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 31, 10962–10973 (2024b). https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.229993610.1080/15376494.2023.2299936 ↗
57. Ramalho, L.D.C., Campilho, R.D.S.G., Belinha, J., da Silva, L.F.M.: Static strength prediction of adhesive joints: a review. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 96, 102451 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10245110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102451 ↗
58. S v, L.S., A, K., C, D.: Evaluation of mechanical properties of 3D printed PETG and polyamide (6) polymers. Chem. Phys. Impact 8, 100491 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2024.10049110.1016/j.chphi.2024.100491 ↗
59. Santos, F.A., Rebelo, H., Coutinho, M., Sutherland, L.S., Cismasiu, C., Farina, I., Fraternali, F.: Low velocity impact response of 3D printed structures formed by cellular metamaterials and stiffening plates: PLA vs. PETg. Compos. Struct. 256, 113128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11312810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113128 ↗
60. Shang, X., Marques, E.A.S., Machado, J.J.M., Carbas, R.J.C., Jiang, D., da Silva, L.F.M.: Review on techniques to improve the strength of adhesive joints with composite adherends. Compos. Part B Eng. 177, 107363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10736310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107363 ↗
61. Spaggiari, A., Denti, F.: Mechanical strength of adhesively bonded joints using polymeric additive manufacturing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 235, 1851–1859 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/095440621985022110.1177/0954406219850221 ↗
62. Sun, Q., Rizvi, G.M., Bellehumeur, C.T., Gu, P.: Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp. J. 14, 72–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254081086202810.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
63. Sun, L., Li, C., Tie, Y., Hou, Y., Duan, Y.: Experimental and numerical investigations of adhesively bonded CFRP single-lap joints subjected to tensile loads. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 95, 102402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10240210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102402 ↗
64. Zamani, P., Jaamialahmadi, A., da Silva, L.F.M.: Fatigue life evaluation of Al-GFRP bonded lap joints under four-point bending using strain-life criteria. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 122, 103338 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10333810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103338 ↗
65. Zhou, L., Miller, J., Vezza, J., Mayster, M., Raffay, M., Justice, Q., Al Tamimi, Z., Hansotte, G., Sunkara, L.D., Bernat, J.: Additive manufacturing: a comprehensive review. Sensors 24, 2668 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2409266810.3390/s24092668 ↗