Pay Zone Determination Using Enhanced Workflow and Neural Network
Source abstract
Abstract
Amplitude versus offset (AVO) analysis and attributes are frequently utilized during the early stages of exploration when no well has been drilled. However, there are still some drawbacks to this method, including the fact that it involves a substantial amount of time and experience, as well as the subjectivity of manual analysis. By utilizing unsupervised learning, this process can be done more objectively and faster. Unsupervised learning can detect anomalies and identify patterns to understand more about the datasets since, at this early stage of exploration, there is still a lack of information and labelling. A type of unsupervised learning referred to as self-organizing maps (SOM) is applied in this study to delineate hydrocarbons from given AVO properties that were used to detect hydrocarbons. SOM is also used to eliminate redundancy in the selection of attributes prior to the delineation procedure. The investigation began with well log data and progressed ahead into multiple fluid conditions to evaluate the model’s ability to identify hydrocarbons. The analysis can then be extended to the seismic dataset. By combining SOM, correlation coefficient, and mean–median, a method is devised for filtering features to remove redundancy. On the hydrocarbon delineation process, the model managed to detect hydrocarbons using well log simulations and was confirmed using water saturation logs. Additionally, the model is validated using real seismic data, demonstrating a promising performance in defining probable hydrocarbons. The proposed method enables early detection of hydrocarbon content during the preliminary stage of exploration when no well is accessible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geosciences, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak 32610, Malaysia
Osaimi Engineering Office, Al-Khobar 35717, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Universiti Teknologi Petronas
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanda, N.C. (2016). Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators (DHI). Seismic Data Interpretation and Evaluation for Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-26491-2 ↗
2. Rowi, V., Haris, A., and Riyanto, A. (2020). Direct hydrocarbon indicator (DHI) pitfall assessment in prospecting pliocene globigerina biogenic gas play in “x structure”, Madura Strait, East Java Basin. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing.10.1088/1755-1315/481/1/012046 ↗
3. Unbiased AVO crossplotting?10.1190/tle35040338.1 ↗
4. Lubo-Robles, D., Ha, T., Lakshmivarahan, S., and Marfurt, K.J. (2019, January 15–20). Supervised seismic facies classification using Probabilistic Neural Networks: Which attributes should the interpreter use?. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1190/segam2019-3216841.1 ↗
5. Seismic interpretation in the age of big data
6. Babikir, I., Salim, A., Hermana, M., Latiff, A.H.A., and Almasgari, A. (2020). Multiattribute analysis of a Pleistocene fluvial system using RGB color blending and self-organizing maps. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2020, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/segam2020-3428029.1 ↗
7. Characterizing a turbidite system in Canterbury Basin, New Zealand, using seismic attributes and distance-preserving self-organizing maps10.1190/INT-2015-0094.1 ↗
8. Borgilchuluun, K., Cao, D., and Yin, X. (2018, January 17–19). Unsupervised learning technique reveals hydrocarbon potential zone on the Penobscot. Proceedings of the SEG 2018 Workshop: SEG Maximizing Asset Value Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Beijing, China.10.1190/AIML2018-14.1 ↗
9. Supervised and unsupervised learning: How machines can assist quantitative seismic interpretation
10. Pore pressure prediction based on seismic attributes response to overpressure10.1071/AJ04035 ↗
11. CO2 storage monitoring: Leakage detection and measurement in subsurface volumes from 3D seismic data at Sleipner10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.458 ↗
12. Avo hodograms and polarization attributes10.1190/1.1445843 ↗
13. Discriminating lithology and pore fill in hydrocarbon prediction from seismic elastic inversion using absorption attributes10.1190/tle36110902.1 ↗
14. Hermana, M., Lubis, L.A., Ghosh, D.P., and Sum, C.W. (2016, January 5). New rock physics template for better hydrocarbon prediction. Proceedings of the Offshore technology conference Asia 2016, OTCA 2016, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/26538-MS ↗
15. Ridwan, T.K., Hermana, M., Lubis, L.A., and Riyadi, Z.A. (2020). New avo attributes and their applications for facies and hydrocarbon prediction: A case study from the northern malay basin. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217786 ↗
16. Seismic interpretation below tuning with multiattribute analysis10.1190/tle36040330.1 ↗
17. AVA classification as an unsupervised machine-learning problem
18. The Self-Organizing Map10.1109/5.58325 ↗
19. Essentials of the self-organizing map10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.018 ↗
20. Efficient feature selection filters for high-dimensional data10.1016/j.patrec.2012.05.019 ↗
21. Katsifarakis, N., and Karatzas, K. (2017). A New Feature Selection Methodology for Environmental Modelling Support: The Case of Thessaloniki Air Quality, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-89935-0_6 ↗