A Study on Cyber Target Importance Quantification and Ranking Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Most of the challenges and conflicts facing countries and groups today involve cyberspace. Therefore, military forces around the world are developing methods (doctrines) and weapon systems to conduct cyberspace operations in order to dominate cyberspace. To conduct cyberspace operations, cyber target information must be collected in cyberspace, and cyber targets must be selected to achieve effective operational objectives. In this study, we develop a target importance rank (TIR) algorithm based on the PageRank algorithm that quantitatively calculates the importance of each target in cyberspace for cyber target selection. The proposed algorithm was developed to quantify the degree of connectivity, criticality, and exposure of computer network hosts, and to create a list of target importance priorities based on the quantified values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Information and Cyber Security · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
Department of Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drones, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
Cyber Warfare Institute, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
Cyber/Network Technology Center 3 Team, Agency for Defense Development, Seoul 05661, Korea
Funding
Agency for Defense Development
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Gates, R.M. (2010). Quadrennial Defense Review Report, Department of Defense.
2. Scott, K.D. (2018). Joint Publication (JP) 3-12 Cyberspace Operation, The Joint Staff.
3. Hersey, N.S. (2021). FM 3-12 Cyberspace and Electromagnetic Warfare, Department of the Army.
4. Scaparrotti, C.M. (2013). Joint Publication 3-60 Joint Targeting, Joint Chiefs of Staff.
5. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2016). CJCSI 3370.01B, Target Development Standards, Joint Chiefs of Staff.
6. Meade, F.G.G. (2012). Effective Synchronization and Integration of Effects Through Cyberspace for the Joint Warfighter, United States Cyber Command.
7. The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X ↗
8. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Winograd, T. (1998). The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Tech. Rep. Stanf. Digit. Libr. Technol. Proj.
9. Kim, A., Kang, M.H., Luo, J.Z., and Velasquez, A. (2014). A Framework for Event Prioritization in Cyber Network Defense. Tech. Rep. Nav. Res. Lab.10.21236/ADA608707 ↗
10. Yoon, K., and Hwang, C. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage.10.4135/9781412985161 ↗
11. W32. stuxnet dossier
12. Nguyen, H.H., Palani, K., and Nicol, D.M. (2017, January 4). An approach to incorporating uncertainty in network security analysis. Proceedings of the Hot Topics in Science of Security: Symposium and Bootcamp (HoTSoS), ACM, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3055305.3055308 ↗
13. Scarfone, K., and Mell, P. (2009, January 15). An analysis of CVSS version 2 vulnerability scoring. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA.10.1109/ESEM.2009.5314220 ↗