journal article·2022-01-16Open access

An α-Model Parametrization Algorithm for Optimization with Differential-Algebraic Equations

Paweł Drąg

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 2

Abstract

An optimization task with nonlinear differential-algebraic equations (DAEs) was approached. In special cases in heat and mass transfer engineering, a classical direct shooting approach cannot provide a solution of the DAE system, even in a relatively small range. Moreover, available computational procedures for numerical optimization, as well as differential- algebraic systems solvers are characterized by their limitations, such as the problem scale, for which the algorithms can work efficiently, and requirements for appropriate initial conditions. Therefore, an αDAE model optimization algorithm based on an α-model parametrization approach was designed and implemented. The main steps of the proposed methodology are: (1) task discretization by a multiple-shooting approach, (2) the design of an α-parametrized system of the differential-algebraic model, and (3) the numerical optimization of the α-parametrized system. The computations can be performed by a chosen iterative optimization algorithm, which can cooperate with an outer numerical procedure for solving DAE systems. The implemented algorithm was applied to solve a counter-flow exchanger design task, which was modeled by the highly nonlinear differential-algebraic equations. Finally, the new approach enabled the numerical simulations for the higher values of parameters denoting the rate of changes in the state variables of the system. The new approach can carry out accurate simulation tests for systems operating in a wide range of configurations and created from new materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heat Transfer and Optimization · Numerical methods for differential equations · Advanced Control Systems Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Control Systems and Mechatronics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

Funding

Department of Control Systems and Mechatronics at Wrocław University of Science and Technology

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Integrated process design, scheduling, and model predictive control of batch processes with closed-loop implementation10.1002/aic.16981 ↗
2. Successive Linearization based Stochastic Model Predictive Control for batch processes described by DAEs10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.06.064 ↗
3. Lirkov, I., and Margenov, S. (2018). Influence of Ant Colony Optimization Parameters on the Algorithm Performance. Large-Scale Scientific Computing LSSC 2017, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-319-73441-5 ↗
4. Comparative analysis between traditional and M-Cycle based cooling tower10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120124 ↗
5. Betts, J.T. (2010). Practical Methods for Optimal Control and Estimation Using Nonlinear Programming, SIAM.10.1137/1.9780898718577 ↗
6. Mars entry guidance for mid-lift-to-drag ratio vehicle with control constraints10.1016/j.ast.2020.106361 ↗
7. Computer Simulation of Heat Transfer in Alumina and Cement Rotary Kilns10.1115/1.4051376 ↗
8. A similarity solution for heat transfer analysis during progressive freeze-concentration based desalination10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107328 ↗
9. Effectiveness of actively adjusting vapour-liquid in the evaporator for heat transfer enhancement10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117696 ↗
10. Development of g-functions for large diameter shallow bore helical ground heat exchangers10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117620 ↗
11. Study of the influence of input parameters in an air channel on mass and heat transfer phenomena within a wall saturated with water: Application to the renovation of old wet buildings10.1080/19401493.2021.1994651 ↗
12. Miettinen, K. (1998). Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6 ↗
13. Nocedal, J., and Wright, S. (2006). Numerical Optimization, Springer.
14. Solving mathematical programs with complementarity constraints as nonlinear programs10.1080/10556780410001654241 ↗
15. On linear programs with linear complementarity constraints10.1007/s10898-010-9644-3 ↗
16. Optimality conditions for optimization problems with complementarity constraints10.1137/S1052623497321882 ↗
17. Mixed-integer nonlinear programming10.1007/s11081-019-09438-1 ↗
18. A data-driven optimization algorithm for differential algebraic equations with numerical infeasibilities10.1002/aic.16657 ↗
19. Dynamic optimization with complementarity constraints: Smoothing for direct shooting10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106891 ↗
20. Large-scale DAE-constrained optimization applied to a modified spouted bed reactor for ethylene production from methane10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.03.017 ↗
21. A direct transcription-based multiple-shooting formulation for dynamic optimization10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106846 ↗
22. Real-time feasible multi-objective optimization based nonlinear model predictive control of particle size and shape in a batch crystallization process10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.08.008 ↗
23. Application of the DAE approach to the nonlinear sloshing problem10.1007/s11071-019-05399-3 ↗
24. Transient Stability-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Calculation With Extremely Unstable Conditions Using Energy Sensitivity Method10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3003522 ↗
25. Water desalination through the dewpoint evaporative system10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113757 ↗
26. A chain smoothing Newton method for heat and mass transfer control with discrete variability DAE models10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.105056 ↗
27. Dynamic o optimization using adaptive direct multiple-shooting10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.09.017 ↗
28. Drąg, P. (2021, January 2–5). A shortened time horizon approach for optimization with differential-algebraic constraints. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems, Sofia, Bulgaria.10.15439/2021F47 ↗
29. Fidanova, S. (2019). The new approach for dynamic optimization with variability constraints. Recent Advances in Computational Optimization: Results of the Workshop on Computational Optimization WCO 2017, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-99648-6 ↗
30. A Homotopy-based Nonlinear Interior-Point Method for NMPC10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2175 ↗
31. Brenan, K.E., Campbell, S.L., and Petzold, L.R. (1995). Numerical Solution of Initial-Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations, SIAM. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.10.1137/1.9781611971224 ↗
32. Hairer, E., Lubich, C., and Roche, M. (1989). The Numerical Solution of Differential-Algebraic Systems by Runge–Kutta Methods, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mathematics.10.1007/BFb0093947 ↗
33. Dynamic optimization for grade transition processes using orthogonal collocation on molecular weight distribution10.1002/aic.16524 ↗
34. A modified collocation modeling framework for dynamic evolution of molecular weight distributions in general polymer kinetic systems10.1016/j.ces.2021.116519 ↗
35. Drąg, P. (2020). A direct optimization algorithm for problems with differential-algebraic constraints: Application to heat and mass transfer. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10249027 ↗
36. Performance study of counter-flow indirect evaporative air coolers10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.004 ↗