Finding Targets in Non-Radial FDH Models: A Hybrid Technique Based on STEM and Extended Ratio Based Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Performance evaluation using interactive methods and extended ratio-based approaches can be very important for some organizations. Free disposal hull models can be created if there is no concern for convexity, and using non-radial DEA models can simultaneously create more logical and practical situations for finding DMU targets. In this paper, a new hybrid technique based on the additive slack based method and enhanced Russel measure in variable return to scale technology has been proposed. The proposed technique can find decision making unit targets in non-radial free disposal hull models using the step method. Furthermore, the extended ratio-based approach in the proposed technique has been applied to find DMU targets of related non-radial free disposal hull models without solving any mathematical programming models. Finally, targets of Fars province pharmaceutical distributing companies were found by applying the proposed hybrid technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Efficiency Analysis Using DEA · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Optimization and Mathematical Programming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Department of Mathematics, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Business Analytics and Economics Research Unit, COPPEAD Graduate Business School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Paschoal Lemme, 355, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil
Department of Management and Technology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC H0H H9X, Canada
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. The measurement of productive efficiency10.2307/2343100 ↗
2. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 ↗
3. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078 ↗
4. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empiric functions10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2 ↗
5. A slack-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5 ↗
6. A note on the additive data envelopment analysis model10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600386 ↗
7. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002 ↗
8. Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—Thirty years on10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032 ↗
9. Two-step benchmarking: Setting more realistically achievable targets in DEA10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.044 ↗
10. Supporting Better Practice Benchmarking: A DEA-ANN Approach to Bank Branch Performance Assessment10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113599 ↗
11. Additive slacks-based measure: Computational strategy and extension to network DEA10.1016/j.omega.2018.12.011 ↗
12. Deprins, D., Simar, L., and Tulkens, H. (1984). Measuring labor efficiency in post offices. The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
13. On the estimation of returns-to-scale in FDH models10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.051 ↗
14. A polynomial-time algorithm to estimate returns to scale in FDH models10.1016/j.cor.2005.08.004 ↗
15. Global sub-increasing and global sub-decreasing returns to scale in free disposal hull technologies: Definition, characterization and calculation10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.005 ↗
16. Efficiency measurement with a non-convex free disposal hull technology10.1057/jors.2015.41 ↗
17. Free disposal hull efficiency scores of units with network structures10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.023 ↗
18. Measuring the Efficiency of Hospital’s Cardiology Wards Using the Free Disposal Hull Approach
19. Solution methods for nonconvex free disposal hull models: A review and some critical comments10.1142/S0217595914500109 ↗
20. Identification of the anchor points in FDH models10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.051 ↗
21. A Novel Improved Data Envelopment Analysis Model Based on SBM and FDH Models
22. Joro, T., and Korhonen, P. (2015). Extension of Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Information, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4899-7528-7 ↗
23. Hwang, C.L., and Masud AS, M. (1979). Multiple Objective Decision Making—Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-45511-7_3 ↗
24. Henriques, C., Luque, M., and Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. (2020). Coupling distinct MOLP interactive approaches with a novel DEA hybrid model. Int. Trans. Oper. Res., 1–22.10.1111/itor.12879 ↗
25. Task-based visual analytics for interactive multiobjective optimization10.1080/01605682.2020.1768809 ↗
26. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis10.1057/jors.1988.127 ↗
27. Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (STEM)10.1007/BF01584098 ↗
28. An improvement on STEM method in multi-criteria analysis
29. Comparative analysis of application efficiency of two iterative multi objective linear programming methods (MP method and STEM method)10.1007/s10100-018-0543-x ↗
30. An interactive procedure to improve estimate of value efficiency in DEA10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.061 ↗
31. Borovička, A. (2020). Algorithmic Improvements of the KSU-STEM Method Verified on a Fund Portfolio Selection. Information, 11.10.3390/info11050262 ↗
32. Location Optimization of Wind Plants Using DEA and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Case Study in Vietnam10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3106281 ↗
33. Wang, C.N., Dang, T.T., Tibo, H., and Duong, D.H. (2021). Assessing renewable energy production capabilities using DEA window and fuzzy TOPSIS model. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13020334 ↗
34. A Two-Stage Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Site Selection of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Power Plant: A Case Study in Taiwan10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3081995 ↗
35. Rousseeuw, P.J., and Leroy, A.M. (1987). Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, Wiley.10.1002/0471725382 ↗
36. Han, J., Kamber, M., and Pei, J. (2012). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann.
37. A predictive DEA model for outlier detection
38. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., and Tone, K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA Solver Software, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8 ↗
39. A DEA model for resource allocation10.1016/j.econmod.2008.01.003 ↗
40. Slack, N., and Lewis, M. (2017). Operations Strategy, Pearson Education.