Memory Model for Morphological Semantics of Visual Stimuli Using Sparse Distributed Representation
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent achievements on CNN (convolutional neural networks) and DNN (deep neural networks) researches provide a lot of practical applications on computer vision area. However, these approaches require construction of huge size of training data for learning process. This paper tries to find a way for continual learning which does not require prior high-cost training data construction by imitating a biological memory model. We employ SDR (sparse distributed representation) for information processing and semantic memory model, which is known as a representation model of firing patterns on neurons in neocortex area. This paper proposes a novel memory model to reflect remembrance of morphological semantics of visual input stimuli. The proposed memory model considers both memory process and recall process separately. First, memory process converts input visual stimuli to sparse distributed representation, and in this process, morphological semantic of input visual stimuli can be preserved. Next, recall process can be considered by comparing sparse distributed representation of new input visual stimulus and remembered sparse distributed representations. Superposition of sparse distributed representation is used to measure similarities. Experimental results using 10,000 images in MNIST (Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology) and Fashion-MNIST data sets show that the sparse distributed representation of the proposed model efficiently keeps morphological semantic of the input visual stimuli.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Visual Attention and Saliency Detection · Image Processing Techniques and Applications · CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of IT Information and Control Engineering, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Kunsan 54150, Korea
Department of Information, Communications and Electronics Engineering, Daejeon University, 62 Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34520, Korea
Funding
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
2. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
3. Generative adversarial nets
4. Eliasmith, C. (2013). How to Build a Brain: A Neural Architecture for Biological Cognition, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794546.001.0001 ↗
5. Ahmad, S., George, D., Edwards, J.L., Saphir, W.C., Astier, F., and Marianetti, R. (2014). Hierarchical Temporal Memory (HTM) System Deployed as Web Service. (US20170180515A1), U.S. Patent.
6. Hawkins, J., and Blakeslee, S. (2007). On Intelligence: How a New Understanding of the Brain Will Lead to the Creation of Truly Intelligent Machines, St. Martin’s Griffin, Macmillan.
7. The MNIST Database of Handwritten Digit Images for Machine Learning Research10.1109/MSP.2012.2211477 ↗
8. Xiao, H., Rasul, K., and Vollgraf, R. (2017). Fashion-MNIST: A Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms. arXiv.
9. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408 ↗
10. Bartlett, F.C., and Burt, C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press.
11. Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3 ↗
12. (2021, November 13). Baddeley & Hitch (1974)—Working Memory—Psychology Unlocked. 10 January 2017. Archived from the original on 6 January 2020. Retrieved 11 January 2017. Available online: http://www.psychologyunlocked.com/working-memory.
13. (2021, November 13). Numenta, Hierarchical Temporal Memory Including HTM Cortical Learning Algorithms. Available online: https://numenta.com/assets/pdf/whitepapers/hierarchical-temporal-memory-cortical-learning-algorithm-0.2.1-en.pdf.
14. Why vision is not both hierarchical and feedforward10.3389/fncom.2014.00135 ↗
15. George, D., and Hawkins, J. (2009). Towards a Mathematical Theory of Cortical Micro-circuits. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000532 ↗
16. A Constrained Feature Selection Approach Based on Feature Clustering and Hypothesis Margin Maximization10.1155/2021/5554873 ↗
17. Feature weight estimation based on dynamic representation and neighbor sparse reconstruction10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.014 ↗
18. Self-representation and PCA embedding for unsupervised feature selection10.1007/s11280-017-0497-2 ↗
19. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images10.1038/381607a0 ↗
20. Sun, Z., and Yu, Y. (2021). Fast Approximation for Sparse Coding with Applications to Object Recognition. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041442 ↗
21. Zheng, H., Yong, H., and Zhang, L. (2021, January 19–25). Deep Convolutional Dictionary Learning for Image Denoising. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Virtual.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00069 ↗
22. Webber, F. (2021, November 13). Semantic Folding Theory-White Paper; Cortical.IO. Available online: https://www.cortical.io/static/downloads/semantic-folding-theory-white-paper.pdf.
23. LeCun, Y., Kavukcuoglu, K., and Farabet, C. (June, January 30). Convolutional networks and applications in vision. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Paris, France.10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537907 ↗
24. Autoencoders, unsupervised learning, and deep architectures
25. Boutarfass, S., and Besserer, B. (2019, January 28–31). Convolutional Autoencoder for Discriminating Handwriting Styles. Proceedings of the 2019 8th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP), Roma, Italy.10.1109/EUVIP47703.2019.8946200 ↗
26. (2021, November 13). Numenta. Sparsity Enables 100x Performance Acceleration in Deep Learning Networks; Technical Demonstration. Available online: https://numenta.com/assets/pdf/research-publications/papers/Sparsity-Enables-100x-Performance-Acceleration-Deep-Learning-Networks.pdf.
27. Cui, Y., Surpur, C., Ahmad, S., and Hawkins, J. (2016, January 24–29). A comparative study of HTM and other neural network models for online sequence learning with streaming data. Proceedings of the 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727380 ↗
28. Brain decoding: Reading minds10.1038/502428a ↗
29. Purdy, S. (2021, November 13). Encoding Data for HTM Systems. Available online: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1602/1602.05925.pdf.
30. Mnatzaganian, J., Fokoué, E., and Kudithipudi, D. (2021, November 13). A Mathematical Formalization of Hierarchical Temporal Memory Cortical Learning Algorithm’s Spatial Pooler. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.06116.
31. Consolidation and Reconsolidation: Two Lives of Memories?10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.037 ↗
32. Functionally distinct high and low theta oscillations in the human hippocampus10.1038/s41467-020-15670-6 ↗