journal article·2021-04-23Open access

Monotonic Functions Method and Its Application to Staging of Patients with Prostate Cancer According to Pretreatment Data

Valeri Gitis, Alexander Derendyaev, Konstantin Petrov, Eugene Yurkov, Sergey Pirogov, Natalia Sergeeva, Boris Alekseev, Andrey Kaprin

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 9

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most frequent malignancy (after lung cancer). Preoperative staging of PCa is the basis for the selection of adequate treatment tactics. In particular, an urgent problem is the classification of indolent and aggressive forms of PCa in patients with the initial stages of the tumor process. To solve this problem, we propose to use a new binary classification machine-learning method. The proposed method of monotonic functions uses a model in which the disease’s form is determined by the severity of the patient’s condition. It is assumed that the patient’s condition is the easier, the less the deviation of the indicators from the normal values inherent in healthy people. This assumption means that the severity (form) of the disease can be represented by monotonic functions from the values of the deviation of the patient’s indicators beyond the normal range. The method is used to solve the problem of classifying patients with indolent and aggressive forms of prostate cancer according to pretreatment data. The learning algorithm is nonparametric. At the same time, it allows an explanation of the classification results in the form of a logical function. To do this, you should indicate to the algorithm either the threshold value of the probability of successful classification of patients with an indolent form of PCa, or the threshold value of the probability of misclassification of patients with an aggressive form of PCa disease. The examples of logical rules given in the article show that they are quite simple and can be easily interpreted in terms of preoperative indicators of the form of the disease.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Healthcare Systems and Public Health · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Economic Sanctions and International Relations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Institute for Information Transmission Problems, 127051 Moscow, Russia

P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute—Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Radiological Centre”, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 125284 Moscow, Russia

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms for Disease Diagnostic
2. Machine learning in medicine10.1056/NEJMra1814259 ↗
3. Machine learning methods for prostate cancer diagnosis
4. A [−2] proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases10.1002/pros.20872 ↗
5. Possibilities of determination of quantitative relationship between the evaluation of clinical condition and functional signs of respiratory insufficiency with the aid of mathematical methods
6. Analysis of the relationship between the severity of the patient’s condition and his physiological indicators in Pattern Recognition
7. Epidemiology of prostate cancer10.14740/wjon1191 ↗
8. Complexed prostate specific antigen improves specificity for prostate cancer detection: Results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial10.1097/01.ju.0000092695.55705.dd ↗
9. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.003 ↗
10. A multi-center study of [−2] pro-prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in combination with PSA and free PSA for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/mL PSA range10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.032 ↗
11. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: A straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy10.1097/01.ju.0000158155.33890.e7 ↗
12. The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy10.1002/cncr.26169 ↗
13. Lorent, M., Maalmi, H., Tessier, P., Supiot, S., Dantan, E., and Foucher, Y. (2019). Meta-analysis of predictive models to assess the clinical validity and utility for patient-centered medical decision making: Application to the CAncer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA). BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 19.10.1186/s12911-018-0727-2 ↗
14. Mamidi, Y. (2020). Classification of Prostate Cancer Patients into Indolent and Aggressive Using Machine Learning. [Master’s Thesis, University of New Orleans].
15. APHIG: A new multiparameter index for prostate cancer10.17650/1726-9776-2016-12-4-94-103 ↗
16. The validation of threshold decision rules and calculator for APhiG algoritm for clarification of prostate cancer staging before treatment10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-1-43-53 ↗
17. Prediction of the Aggressive Status of Prostate Cancer on the Basis of Preoperative Data10.1134/S1064226917120129 ↗
18. Diagnostic Model that Takes Medical Preferences into Account. Prediction of the Clinical Status of Prostate Cancer10.1134/S1064226919080266 ↗
19. New algorithm aphigt for prostate cancer staging: MP53-0910.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1680 ↗
20. Zakrevskii, A. (1966). “Optimization of coverings of sets”. Logical Language for Representation of Synthesis Algorithms of Relay Devices, Nauka.
21. Emerging biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer10.1373/clinchem.2008.110668 ↗
22. Screening for prostate cancer10.1016/j.ejca.2004.12.029 ↗
23. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up10.1056/NEJMoa1113135 ↗
24. Correlation of Gleason scores between needle-core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70243-6 ↗
25. Toward metrological traceability in the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA): Calibrating Beckman Coulter Hybritech Access PSA assays to WHO standards compared with the traditional Hybritech standards10.1515/CCLM.2008.129 ↗
26. Sobin, L.H., Gospodarowicz, M.K., and Wittekind, C. (2011). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780471420194.tnmc26 ↗
27. PHI and PCA3 improve the prognostic performance of PRIAS and Epstein criteria in predicting insignificant prostate cancer in men eligible for active surveillance10.1007/s00345-015-1643-z ↗
28. Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.054 ↗
29. Low prostate-specific antigen and no Gleason score upgrade despite more extensive cancer during active surveillance predicts insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.045 ↗
30. Basic principles of ROC analysis10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2 ↗
31. Detecting random responders with infrequency scales using an error-balancing threshold10.3758/s13428-017-0964-9 ↗